Does any of this today have a direct bearing on the Flynn case?

Who's next? I'm guessing it'll be either Baker or Page.

Quote:

---

2. On July 31, 2016, the FBI opened a Foreign Agents Registration Act ("FARA")
investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane into whether individual(s) associated with the Donald
J. Trump for President Campaign were witting of and/or coordinating activities with the Russian
government. By August 16, 2016, the FBI had opened individual cases under the Crossfire
Hurricane umbrella on four United States persons including a United States person referred to
herein as "Individual #1."

---

We know Flynn was one of the four. Who were the two others? Manafort? Cohen?

drcrinum said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Actual Information linked HERE

In the process of reviewing it now.

---

From reading the document, it is very clear that there was deliberate intent on the part of Clinesmith.

From the NYTSlimes article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share

Quote:

---

"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."

---

ROTFLMAO!

---

.....bull-f*****g-s**t! That is EXACTLY what his intent was. Any plea without accepting that fact is crap.

drcrinum said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Actual Information linked HERE

In the process of reviewing it now.

---

From reading the document, it is very clear that there was deliberate intent on the part of Clinesmith.

From the NYTSlimes article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share

Quote:

---

"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."

---

ROTFLMAO!

---

x eleventy billion

The SoB changed is to is not. There is no way he believed he was relaying accurate information.

Lots of statements can have wiggle room. Changing "is" to "is not" has no wiggle room. Says a lot that this is their position.

VegasAg86 said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Actual Information linked HERE

In the process of reviewing it now.

---

From reading the document, it is very clear that there was deliberate intent on the part of Clinesmith.

From the NYTSlimes article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share

Quote:

---

"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."

---

ROTFLMAO!

---

x eleventy billion

The SoB changed is to is not. There is no way he believed he was relaying accurate information.

Lots of statements can have wiggle room. Changing "is" to "is not" has no wiggle room. Says a lot that this is their position.

---

I guess when the alternative is admitting to treason, you go with something like that, as laughable and bull**** as it is.

Rockdoc said:

---

Does any of this today have a direct bearing on the Flynn case?

---

Clinesmith had his fingers in the Counterintelligence Investigation of Flynn that was opened in August 2016. He approved the briefing notes that Pientka used during the Trump briefing in August 2016 where Pientka was tasked with observing Flynn for future interrogation purposes.

VegasAg86 said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Actual Information linked HERE

In the process of reviewing it now.

---

From reading the document, it is very clear that there was deliberate intent on the part of Clinesmith.

From the NYTSlimes article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share

Quote:

---

"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."

---

ROTFLMAO!

---

x eleventy billion

The SoB changed is to is not. There is no way he believed he was relaying accurate information.

Lots of statements can have wiggle room. Changing "is" to "is not" has no wiggle room. Says a lot that this is their position.

---

It depends on what your definition of "is" is.

Does this plea deal impact Flynn's case at all since Flynn was one of the four under surveillance

NYT is FOS has a good bumper sticker ring to it.

akm91 said:

---

Does this plea deal impact Flynn's case at all since Flynn was one of the four under surveillance

---

His charges aren't related to the FISA warrants.

It does help show it was a set-up, as part of the overall scheme, rather than a legitimate interview.

I was surprised to see both CNN and MSNBC had this near the top of their websites.

I think it is important for Durham/Barr to go after smaller people like this first.

If they took down a Comey/Clapper/Brennan first, people would just say it is a partisan attack.

Taking down lower level people first will hopefully show this is not partisan. It will be tough to deny the facts, even for our concerned moderates here.

I got a call from nortex97 and he laughed at this plea, which isn't predicated on any kind of cooperation etc. a la mccabe/weissman etc. This is a stand alone farce. Enjoy your weekend everyone, because Durham isn't putting some sort of great RICO etc. case together against the coup plotters.

drcrinum said:

---

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share

Quote:

---

"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."

---

ROTFLMAO!

---

K188Ag said:

---

So, on Hannity, Barr said:

it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."

This sounds like great news. Barr seems to be indicating that this is small stuff compared to what will be coming. I think the Barr comment was a deliberate shot across the bow to the higher ups.

It will be interesting to see how the Sunday shows handle this.

---

I agree with your post but on the last item, I'm pretty sure none of the Sunday shows will even mention it except Maria Bartoromo. It will be all about biden's VP pick and the usual madeup BS about Trump.

Bartoromo will likely have a couple of guests that have been heavily involved in exposing this corruption, such as Devin Nunes or Doug Collins. They have been regulars on there.

Durham over target. The right pigs are squealing, and squealing loud! Weissmann is having a twitter meltdown.

Amid all the Clinesmith excitement, let's not lose sight of CTH's looming 5:00 P.M. deadline today.

Color me skeptical that it'll amount to much of anything, but I'm curious nonetheless.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/08/10/status-update-meet-at-the-old-mill-we-ride-at-midnight/#more-197763

I haven't read the information yet (about to). How badly is he twisting the facts here?

VegasAg86 said:

---

I haven't read the information yet (about to). How badly is he twisting the facts here?

---

LOL. He really isn't twisting facts as much as a full misunderstanding of what the information does and does not say. He's filling in blanks that aren't there with speculation. That's why I said he was having a meltdown. No sober legal analysis happening at all.

For being such a smart lawyer, he sure takes to twitter quickly to lament decisions that don't involve him/his clients directly. Weird.

dreyOO said:

---

Hey dip**** Weissman, he wouldn't have pled guilty if he wasn't, right? Isn't that the same ****ing logic you guys are using with Flynn?

---

Weismann is such a despicable weasel.

aggiehawg said:

---

You betcha Weissmann gave the order for the Code Red. That's why he's in melt mode.

---

CyclingAg82 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

You betcha Weissmann gave the order for the Code Red. That's why he's in melt mode.

---

---

Of course he looks a lot more like Weinberg:

True.

If you have 80 minutes, this is worth watching -- worth it's own thread -- just released about 4 hours ago & will likely soon be scrubbed. The Shadow Government.

Remember the private contractors & the unauthorized 702 queries? Peanuts. These 2 'whistleblowers' claim there are patches to the NSA data collection base where real-time data is continuously being downloaded to servers outside the US. There it is analyzed by private security-intelligence companies who compile data at the personal-individual level & have at their disposal, military-grade PSYOP algorithms, the latter which then can be used for a wide variety of nefarious operations such as blackmailing public figures & politicians, influencing elections & controlling public sentiment via social media & the MSM, etc. It's too much information to even summarize, but for our purposes, this is where Steele Dossier material originated. It's also how the Trump impeachment attempt over Ukraine was orchestrated. It explains the Cambridge Analytica involvement.

well...damn, sidney.