Good.TxAgLaw03RW said:
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a couple indictments soon and they include Republicans. Barr's final statement in the interview was geared towards the same standard regardless of politics.
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,773,943 Views |
49456 Replies |
Last: 3 hrs ago by nortex97
X 2aggiehawg said:Good.TxAgLaw03RW said:
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a couple indictments soon and they include Republicans. Barr's final statement in the interview was geared towards the same standard regardless of politics.
I am cautiously optimistic and would gladly have all the facts come out regardless of political affiliations. Hope the guilty are finally held accountable for all their nefarious activities.TxAgLaw03RW said:
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a couple indictments soon and they include Republicans. Barr's final statement in the interview was geared towards the same standard regardless of politics.
Nvm, it loaded
drcrinum said:
Barr just said on Hannity that there will be a 'development' announced tomorrow...it will not be earth-shattering.
Quote:
Barr, who made the announcement Thursday evening during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, stressed it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."
Anyone on pins and needles? I for one has been waiting for some official sign that Durham's investigation is making progress.
One pattern I have noticed over the last 3 1/2 years is the Friday announcement of indictments after a Thursday grand jury session.
CNN reports yesterday (Thursday) that Durham's DC grand jury had been reconvened recently. Barr says there are developments that are announced today but not earth shattering. An indictment of someone low on the totem pole is what I expect.
ETA: Barring emergencies, most federal grand juries sit in session Monday-Thursday.
CNN reports yesterday (Thursday) that Durham's DC grand jury had been reconvened recently. Barr says there are developments that are announced today but not earth shattering. An indictment of someone low on the totem pole is what I expect.
ETA: Barring emergencies, most federal grand juries sit in session Monday-Thursday.
I hope by "not earth shattering" he means he will confirm what most logical people already know. And Durhams announcement will sound something like this:
"Russian collusion was entirely made up,
Obama's admin orchestrated the whole thing,
Mueller's team was a giant fraud,
And indictments are next. Sleep well traitors! There will be no questions"
"Russian collusion was entirely made up,
Obama's admin orchestrated the whole thing,
Mueller's team was a giant fraud,
And indictments are next. Sleep well traitors! There will be no questions"
Makes sense. I find it extremely interesting that Durham's convened a GJ in DC and there's not a whiff of it until yesterday. There were lots of educated guesses but no one had actually reported on it until CNN of all sources.
I'd wager most of the subjects or targets of the grand jury have connections to DC making it jurisdictional. Couldn't be indicted in Connecticut without any ties to Connecticut, for example.akm91 said:
Makes sense. I find it extremely interesting that Durham's convened a GJ in DC and there's not a whiff of it until yesterday. There were lots of educated guesses but no one had actually reported on it until CNN of all sources.
The rules on jurisdiction put DC as the best location to apply to the widest number of current or former swamp dwellers.
Don't doubt that but given the amount of leaking that happens in DC, just find it very curious that this was kept under lid.
This is a good example of how the DOJ should operate.
This is a good example of how the DOJ should operate.
So something that is strikingly clear recently is the lack of leaks from President Trumps administration. FINALLY it seems like they have gotten the leaks under control.
John Durham... NO LEAKS
John Bash... NO LEAKS
Peace deal facilitated by President Trumps administration... NO LEAK. We didn't even have a whiff of anything coming on that front. And Biden just before the announcement was saying that President Trumps actions in Israel were detrimental to the ME and peace. So it looks like the Democrats had no leaks on that either.
Really excited for what could be in the next four years when President Trump is re-elected and draining the swamp.
John Durham... NO LEAKS
John Bash... NO LEAKS
Peace deal facilitated by President Trumps administration... NO LEAK. We didn't even have a whiff of anything coming on that front. And Biden just before the announcement was saying that President Trumps actions in Israel were detrimental to the ME and peace. So it looks like the Democrats had no leaks on that either.
Really excited for what could be in the next four years when President Trump is re-elected and draining the swamp.
Which again goes back to the original intent to pack the DC Circuit with Obama hyper-partisans by nuking the filibuster, and based on the inane oral arguments before/made by them with Flynn's case I think it is probably working for the communists.aggiehawg said:I'd wager most of the subjects or targets of the grand jury have connections to DC making it jurisdictional. Couldn't be indicted in Connecticut without any ties to Connecticut, for example.akm91 said:
Makes sense. I find it extremely interesting that Durham's convened a GJ in DC and there's not a whiff of it until yesterday. There were lots of educated guesses but no one had actually reported on it until CNN of all sources.
The rules on jurisdiction put DC as the best location to apply to the widest number of current or former swamp dwellers.
Getting a decent grand jury of citizens in DC is hard enough (and unlikely), but then any trial has to go thru the likes of 'judges' (9 of which are Obama judges) like Sullivan, then on any appeal win votes from folks like Pillard, Wilkins and Millet etc.
Picture two benches full of Tomeka Harts, with Sullivan in charge of it all. It's quite deliberately very, very difficult to indict, and convict, then sentence/imprison any Democrat in DC.
Thought it might be Clinesmith since they had him dead to rights. But if it is a plea deal, then he's squealing on who else knew Page was a CIA asset.
Pucker factor just went up significantly for some of the swamp denizens.aggiehawg said:
Thought it might be Clinesmith since they had him dead to rights. But if it is a plea deal, then he's squealing on who else knew Page was a CIA asset.
drcrinum said:
The NYTSlimes appears to know what is coming from Durham today.
LOLQuote:
Mr. Clinesmith's lawyers said he made a mistake while trying to clarify facts for a colleague.
He changed Page is a CIA asset to Page is NOT a CIA asset. That is intentional, not "a mistake while trying to clarify facts".
Also doesn't matter that he changed an email, they intentionally did this and were part of the bigger plan, one email doesn't mean squat In the big picture ..VegasAg86 said:drcrinum said:
The NYTSlimes appears to know what is coming from Durham today.LOLQuote:
Mr. Clinesmith's lawyers said he made a mistake while trying to clarify facts for a colleague.
He changed Page is a CIA asset to Page is NOT a CIA asset. That is intentional, not "a mistake while trying to clarify facts".
They are putting pressure on Brennan is my guess, they will be talking to him here shortly
So, on Hannity, Barr said:
it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."
This sounds like great news. Barr seems to be indicating that this is small stuff compared to what will be coming. I think the Barr comment was a deliberate shot across the bow to the higher ups.
It will be interesting to see how the Sunday shows handle this.
it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."
This sounds like great news. Barr seems to be indicating that this is small stuff compared to what will be coming. I think the Barr comment was a deliberate shot across the bow to the higher ups.
It will be interesting to see how the Sunday shows handle this.
Yep... Barr indicating this is just the small potatoes right now... the BIG Hammer will be out soon!K188Ag said:
So, on Hannity, Barr said:
it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."
This sounds like great news. Barr seems to be indicating that this is small stuff compared to what will be coming. I think the Barr comment was a deliberate shot across the bow to the higher ups.
It will be interesting to see how the Sunday shows handle this.
Qs roadmap all coming to fruition!
Does this thread and The Q thread finally merge at the Y in the road?
Interesting strategy here. Conviction of a low level person to get cooperation to go after higher ups. I thought the DoJ liked to give blanket immunity to not get any convictions. It's almost like Barr believes in the rule of law, rather than protecting political comrades.aggiehawg said:And if McCabe is in legal jeopardy, so is his assistant ,Lisa Page, Strzok, James Baker, counsel to Comey and Comey himself, at a minimum.TacosaurusRex said:
After 2-1/2 years of Qanon, as paired with this thread, I believe there is very little that I would consider as "earth-shattering", be it news or development.K188Ag said:
So, on Hannity, Barr said:
it won't be an "earth-shattering development," but an "indication that things are moving along at the proper pace, as dictated by the facts in this investigation."
This sounds like great news. Barr seems to be indicating that this is small stuff compared to what will be coming. I think the Barr comment was a deliberate shot across the bow to the higher ups.
It will be interesting to see how the Sunday shows handle this.
Just my perspective...
Under 18 U.S.C. Section1001, the penalty for making false statements is a maximum sentence of up to five years in prison. However, if the false statement is related to an act of terror, human trafficking, or certain sex offenses, the maximum sentence increases to eight years.
question for the lawyers
FISA ****** clinesmith goes down, anyone convicted from evidence stemming from that FISA warrant is now fruit of the poisonous tree?
FISA ****** clinesmith goes down, anyone convicted from evidence stemming from that FISA warrant is now fruit of the poisonous tree?
Reading closely, yes nearly everyone associated with the first Carter Page warrant is in jeopardy as they knew Page was a CIA asset in August 2016 before the first application was even filed. Clinesmith wasn't the only one on the team of "members" who received that information.
We were already there when the last two FISA warrants were withdrawn. Attorneys for defendants are certainly reviewing the situations.pacecar02 said:
question for the lawyers
FISA ****** clinesmith goes down, anyone convicted from evidence stemming from that FISA warrant is now fruit of the poisonous tree?
From reading the document, it is very clear that there was deliberate intent on the part of Clinesmith.aggiehawg said:
Actual Information linked HERE
In the process of reviewing it now.
From the NYTSlimes article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html?smid=tw-share
Quote:
"Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email," Mr. Clinesmith's lawyer, Justin Shur, said in a statement. "It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues as he believed the information he relayed was accurate. But Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility."
ROTFLMAO!
Featured Stories
See All
23:50
7m ago
278
Keys to the Game: No. 12 Texas A&M vs. Vanderbilt
by Luke Evangelist
9:18
1h ago
536
22:52
1d ago
3.3k
Habanero Guero
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
51
Nonregdrummer09
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
31