They probably won't.SpreadsheetAg said:
So what excuse will these fools give for unmasking Flynn BEFORE the Kislyak call?
They'll just gaslight everyone into believing it was because of the Kislyak call and move on
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,604,921 Views |
49329 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by JFABNRGR
They'll just gaslight everyone into believing it was because of the Kislyak call and move on
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
Just so I'm cleAr on what was released, those are the names of the people and dates for which unmasking requests were done on Flynn?
Watergate is child play compared to systematic spying Obama administration conducted. If I'm not mistaken, this list only relates to Flynn.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
Yes4stringAg said:
Just so I'm cleAr on what was released, those are the names of the people and dates for which unmasking requests were done on Flynn?
Correct. This list only relates to Flynn AND ONLY FOR A SPECIFIC, SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.
THERE WILL BE MORE.
THERE WILL BE MORE.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
So how do these people figure out they want to unmask someone? Do the intel agents pour over intercepted phone calls and bring it to someones attention? How would these people know to ask for this specific person to be unmasked? And are they able to show anyone else the information?
I'm guessing FBI CIA insiders. Several names in each org you can choose from.
Good Day.
When you combine that with their other acts, and the reasons for it all, it is the biggest scandal in history. Period, and that includes calling things like the american revolution 'scandals'.Pinche Abogado said:
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Yep also hearing/seeing that there is MUCH more to this that will come out.
Note: they never, ever retreat. They are still trying to sentence him.Pinche Abogado said:
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Pinche Abogado said:
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Quoting again because it can't be explained any better or often enough.
nortex97 said:Note: they never, ever retreat. They are still trying to sentence him.Pinche Abogado said:
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Exactly. You'd think they'd be telling the judge to get this thing over with and done as soon as possible. They are doubling down on keeping it in the news and creating more and more reasons for Trump, Barr, Durham, Grenell etc to continue hitting back.
They are literally letting the Dems hang themselves with their own rope. It's beautiful.4stringAg said:nortex97 said:Note: they never, ever retreat. They are still trying to sentence him.Pinche Abogado said:
It cannot be stated enough: UNMASKING OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PHONE CALL.
Dems caught CLEARLY spying on American citizens for political gain.
BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Exactly. You'd think they'd be telling the judge to get this thing over with and done as soon as possible. They are doubling down on keeping it in the news and creating more and more reasons for Trump, Barr, Durham, Grenell etc to continue hitting back.
Quote:
This response does not include any requests outside of the specified time-frame.
Does this mean there are more requests prior?
Hunting the Hunters. Unmasking the Unmaskers.
So do we still think there was also a FISA or Title 3 warrant on Flynn, in addition to these unmaskings? I was thinking the unmasking refers to incidental contact, whereas FISA is direct, if that makes sense. Or are they one in the same?
It's back:Senor Cardgage said:Link is gone.drcrinum said:
https://sidneypowell.com/media/open-memorandum-to-barack-obama/
Sidney Powell: Open Memorandum to Barack Obama.
https://sidneypowell.com/media/open-memorandum-to-barack-obama/
Before and after. It is now speculated that this activity occurred as early as 2009 and continuing through Trump administration.TurkeyBaconLeg said:Quote:
This response does not include any requests outside of the specified time-frame.
Does this mean there are more requests prior?
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
Powers was a busy bee in December
Quote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
HOLY CRAP!
I know we are not supposed to mix in the Q thread stuff, but Q just dropped something amazing.
I know we are not supposed to mix in the Q thread stuff, but Q just dropped something amazing.
Quote:
Go back further.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-report-says-about-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-donald-n995866[url=https://archive.today/newest/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-report-says-about-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-donald-n995866][/url]
The 'Hook'.
Nov 30 'unmask' needed justification?
WHO SET UP THE MEETING?
WHO WAS DIRECTING AMB. KISLYAK TO MAKE CONTACT [MEETING + PHONE]?
Q
She has denied having any recollection of making those requests. But since she was in the White House, I'd wager Valerie Jarrett was using Power's lap top and password.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
39 different persons made 49 requests, only 8 of which were after the Kislyak call.
I'm not much of a mathelete, but that doesn't sound like his call had anything to do with it.
I'm not much of a mathelete, but that doesn't sound like his call had anything to do with it.
Staff - take out the trash.
I believe she actually said someone must have hacked her account. I'm sure there's a significant investigation to find the hacker. Probably the same person that hacked Joy Reid's archived blog posts.aggiehawg said:She has denied having any recollection of making those requests. But since she was in the White House, I'd wager Valerie Jarrett was using Power's lap top and password.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
Staff - take out the trash.
You reckon that all of those Treasury folks requesting unmaskings were really someone else too?
aggiehawg said:She has denied having any recollection of making those requests. But since she was in the White House, I'd wager Valerie Jarrett was using Power's lap top and password.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
I'd wager Powers is simply lying.
That never flies as an excuse anywhere people are required to have log ins. She needs to be charged and prosecuted.aggiehawg said:She has denied having any recollection of making those requests. But since she was in the White House, I'd wager Valerie Jarrett was using Power's lap top and password.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
At this point it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the next name released that was unmasked by these corrupt thugs would be Emmet G. Sullivan.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Holy frickin' cow, I had now idea her husband is Cass Sunstein.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
That speaks volumes. I also saw where she received a Pulitzer. Damned if they aren't just handing those things out like Chiclets these days.
I'm guessing the answer to the Q (ha, get it?) is Samantha Power. Ambassador to the UN...TurkeyBaconLeg said:
HOLY CRAP!
I know we are not supposed to mix in the Q thread stuff, but Q just dropped something amazing.Quote:
Go back further.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-report-says-about-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-donald-n995866[url=https://archive.today/newest/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-report-says-about-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-donald-n995866][/url]
The 'Hook'.
Nov 30 'unmask' needed justification?
WHO SET UP THE MEETING?
WHO WAS DIRECTING AMB. KISLYAK TO MAKE CONTACT [MEETING + PHONE]?
Q
Na, Valerie just had to ask O, Biden, or O's Chief of Staff. Why borrow someone else's login?aggiehawg said:She has denied having any recollection of making those requests. But since she was in the White House, I'd wager Valerie Jarrett was using Power's lap top and password.akm91 said:
Powers was a busy bee in DecemberQuote:
-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power - Seven requests: November 30, 2016 -December 2, 7, 14, 23, 2016, January 11, 2017
Power's just lying her ass off because she knows she's toast.
No.rcb said:
You reckon that all of those Treasury folks requesting unmaskings were really someone else too?
The reason I remarked that Power denied it was because that was tantamount to admitting she allowed someone else to use her information. She's lying about the hack because she knows who did use her information but telling a version of the truth that it wasn't her. Left herself some wiggle room for an immunity deal down the road somewhere.