Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,728,431 Views | 49402 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by nortex97
rcb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The more the onion is peeled back now, it almost seems we've been wrong all along. It really should be....

"they KNEW she was going to lose."

Plus, just wanted to get a post in on my birthday
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ccaggie05 said:

I remember asking this about 1-2 years ago, but I was curious what the best books, if any, are regarding this whole Spygate/FISA/Flynn etc... situation.

I saw Andrew McCarthy from NR has one, "Ball of Collusion" and Dan Bongino has a couple on the topic. Anybody else? I've already read the related books by Gregg Jarrett.


I believe Hannity has a new that just came out and he's been all over this from the beginning.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?






This is pretty rich.
Baron von Bulsh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do these people really believe that?
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, we are living in two different realities.
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This guy is completely insane.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well he is a Rothschild.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ccaggie05 said:

I remember asking this about 1-2 years ago, but I was curious what the best books, if any, are regarding this whole Spygate/FISA/Flynn etc... situation.

I saw Andrew McCarthy from NR has one, "Ball of Collusion" and Dan Bongino has a couple on the topic. Anybody else? I've already read the related books by Gregg Jarrett.


The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History by Lee Smith

I've seen a number of good comments about this book on Twitter from people I follow.

houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess these old families can only take so much inbreeding and pedophilia.
redsquirrelAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

Well he is a Rothschild.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's trying, and failing, to save the narrative.

Flynn is a bookend to the activities of a President who had Democrats audit Joe The Plumber in Ohio simply because the man dared challenge the Democrat Party in general and Obama's tax policy in particular.

Obama had a Marxist viewpoint in his policy approaches and a Stalinist paradigm towards opposition.

I am fully convinced that the things done to Trump in terms of surveillance were done in a much more subtle form to the Romney Campaign in 2012. With the success of that operation, Obama and company grew more bold and expanded their operation with a goal towards ensuring an extension of his policy approaches through Hillary Clinton.

In their success and arrogance, they grew increasingly convinced that they could never be caught.

Now, exposed for all to see, Obama is left with an echo chamber of sycophants flailing at every excuse they can possibly muster to shield the people from the truth.

But the bold nature of discourse, even from the likes of the usually careful Hugh Hewitt, tells me that more, much more, is coming that will fully expose the corruption and illegality of the Obama Administration.




3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ccaggie05 said:

I remember asking this about 1-2 years ago, but I was curious what the best books, if any, are regarding this whole Spygate/FISA/Flynn etc... situation.

I saw Andrew McCarthy from NR has one, "Ball of Collusion" and Dan Bongino has a couple on the topic. Anybody else? I've already read the related books by Gregg Jarrett.


I would think Flynn would have a book in the near future. He needs the money (lawsuits will take a while) and he has a tremendous story to tell. I hope he comes out with one soon.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wozlaw said:

Yes, we are living in two different realities.
True.

But one side is clearly on the defensive and existing in a constant state of fear over what is going to come next.

The excuses, lame as they are at this point, are running out.

wyoag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Liberals have accused conservatives of blindly following Trump, despite all the unverified "evidence" that linked Trump to Russia. Now there is verified evidence that the intelligence community was corrupt and it points directly to the Obama administration...yet Liberals continue to blindly support their savior...Obama. ****ing hypocrites.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stlkofta said:

He's trying, and failing, to save the narrative.

Flynn is a bookend to the activities of a President who had Democrats audit Joe The Plumber in Ohio simply because the man dared challenge the Democrat Party in general and Obama's tax policy in particular.

Obama had a Marxist viewpoint in his policy approaches and a Stalinist paradigm towards opposition.

I am fully convinced that the things done to Trump in terms of surveillance were done in a much more subtle form to the Romney Campaign in 2012. With the success of that operation, Obama and company grew more bold and expanded their operation with a goal towards ensuring an extension of his policy approaches through Hillary Clinton.

In their success and arrogance, they grew increasingly convinced that they could never be caught.





This could explain why Romney has become a RINO. They probably found dirt on him that he doesn't want exposed.
Kanyes psychiatrist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wyoag93 said:

Liberals have accused conservatives of blindly following Trump, despite all the unverified "evidence" that linked Trump to Russia. Now there is verified evidence that the intelligence community was corrupt and it points directly to the Obama administration...yet Liberals continue to blindly support their savior...Obama. ****ing hypocrites.
Despite all the degrees on the wall, liberals lack common sense, intelligence, and critical thinking. They have been brain washed into supporting a corrupt party rapidly shifting towards communism that is full of truly evil people.
Bonfire1996
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem with all their theories into how dirty Trump and his Assoc. are is..........

They went after the most honorable of them all. 3 star General Flynn. Going after him when he did nothing wrong demands accountability from not just the right, but from moderates who try to do the right thing every day.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's because they think they are better than you.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Baron von Bulsh said:

Do these people really believe that?


They MUST believe it. Their self narrative and their perception of the political world around them is dependent on this being true. They can't accept that they've been on the wrong side of facts and truths for 4 years, because it implies their ideology is deeply flawed, and that can't be tolerated.

Their ideology tells them they are always the good guys. They can't deal with the idea they've been supporting the bad guys and been manipulated and exploited by them.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

Stlkofta said:

He's trying, and failing, to save the narrative.

Flynn is a bookend to the activities of a President who had Democrats audit Joe The Plumber in Ohio simply because the man dared challenge the Democrat Party in general and Obama's tax policy in particular.

Obama had a Marxist viewpoint in his policy approaches and a Stalinist paradigm towards opposition.

I am fully convinced that the things done to Trump in terms of surveillance were done in a much more subtle form to the Romney Campaign in 2012. With the success of that operation, Obama and company grew more bold and expanded their operation with a goal towards ensuring an extension of his policy approaches through Hillary Clinton.

In their success and arrogance, they grew increasingly convinced that they could never be caught.





This could explain why Romney has become a RINO. They probably found dirt on him that he doesn't want exposed.
I've always viewed Romney that way. He was the worst possible candidate to select because of his healthcare actions in Massachusetts.

Could he have been compromised? With a President having a prior history of digging up dirt illegally on political opponents? Most certainly.

Someone broke into his private emails. It would not be a surprise if others did the same thing with regard to database collections referencing his political, business and investment dealings.

benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Very long article about Spygate but gives some details about how 702 queries work that are of interest.

Read the rest There's a lot to unpack.
I wonder how much we'll ever learn about FISA-702 'to-from' query on US persons that Rogers shut down in April 2016. This story has almost disappeared from the news cycle. Still boggles my mind how corrupt this practice likely evolved during the Obama admin. Likely a much bigger scandal than everything we know about Obamagate to date.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kanyes psychiatrist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

That's because they think they are better than you.
Anyone with an IQ under 110 isn't better than me. I don't care what their art history and philosophy degrees say. These mental midgets support traitors and pedophiles for heavens sake!
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

aggiehawg said:

Very long article about Spygate but gives some details about how 702 queries work that are of interest.

Read the rest There's a lot to unpack.
I wonder how much we'll ever learn about FISA-702 'to-from' query on US persons that Rogers shut down in April 2016. This story has almost disappeared from the news cycle. Still boggles my mind how corrupt this practice likely evolved during the Obama admin. Likely a much bigger scandal than everything we know about Obamagate to date.
I've said before and believe 100% that every Supreme Court Justice, every federal judge, and every representative and Senator, every potential future policy maker (including governors, etc) was targeted and unmasked for dirt that could be selectively used to influence their vote or decision on future important issues. This seems like exactly something the obama admin would do.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THIS IS WHY THEY HAD TO TAKE DOWN FLYNN. THEY WERE ALL STEALING BILLIONS OF TAXPAYER MONEY.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's BAAAAAACK!

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Halper was run off book of CIA and FBI but he was being paid handsomely the DOD's Office of Net Assessment, whatever the hell that office is supposed to do.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Halper was funded and tasked outside of the government, there would have been a go-between like Perkins Coie handling the funding.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JJMt said:

captkirk said:

Que Te Gusta Mas said:

Kristol signaling the establishment's next plan?


This guy is a complete moron
What happened to Kristol? Can TDS really explain him today? He used to be a smart, insightful guy. Now, he's just parroting Democratic propaganda and lies (but that is redundant).
Are y'all missing the winky icon at the bottom? I took this as a joke, making fun of the OBVIOUS plan by the Dems that of course will never happen.
SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder what FISA 702 "about" queries were run on Romney campaign officials? Prior history of illegal use of this stuff would put a bow on a conspiracy case.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Non twitter types might miss that detail. It did seem like a troll to me.
Post removed:
by user
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SPF250 said:

Wonder what FISA 702 "about" queries were run on Romney campaign officials? Prior history of illegal use of this stuff would put a bow on a conspiracy case.
This. The FBI contractors need to be named. And the most frequent of their 702 query targets also be identified.

When people see how many and which people were targeted for illegal spying, many more might pay attention to how big this really was.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

So how involved was Biden with all of the (likely) illegal activities of the Obama administration?

Quote:

1 Biden was present at a Russia collusion briefing documented in an "odd" Susan Rice email.
Biden was documented as being present in the Oval Office for a conversation about the controversial Russia probe between President Obama, disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and other senior officials including Obama's national security advisor Susan Rice.

In an action characterized as "odd" in 2018 by then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Rice memorialized the confab in an email to herself describing Obama as starting "the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities 'by the book.'"
Quote:

The email was sent during the period Obama reportedly personally raised purported red flags to then-President-elect Trump about hiring Flynn during an Oval Office meeting two days after the election.

An attorney for Rice responded to Grassley's letter saying Rice wrote the email to herself with the goal of "memorializ[ing] an important national security discussion," since "President Obama and his national security team were justifiably concerned about potential risks to the Nation's security from sharing highly classified information about Russia with certain members of the Trump transition team, particularly Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn."

The attorney's previous admission that the conversation was about Flynn may raise immediate red flags now that Flynn's case was dropped amid reports of possible wrongdoing by the FBI.

Quote:

2 Biden was reportedly involved in the controversial early stages of the Russia collusion probe.
Biden was reportedly one of the few Obama administration officials who participated in secretive meetings during the early stages of the Obama-era intelligence community's initial operations regarding suspected Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.

That tidbit was contained deep inside a 7,700-plus word Washington Post article published June 23, 2017 in which the newspaper also detailed the highly compartmentalized nature of the original Russia interference investigation and the manner in which other U.S. intelligence agencies were deliberately kept in the dark. Part of the efforts eventually involved unsubstantiated and ultimately discredited charges made by the Christopher Steele dossier that Trump campaign officials were colluding with Russia.
Quote:

According to the newspaper, in the summer of 2016, CIA Director John Brennan convened a "secret task force at CIA headquarters composed of several dozen analysts and officers from the CIA, the NSA and the FBI."
The Post described the unit as so secretive it functioned as a "sealed compartment" hidden even from the rest of the U.S. intelligence community; a unit whose workers were all made to sign additional non-disclosure forms.
The unit reported to top officials, the newspaper documented:
Quote:

They worked exclusively for two groups of "customers," officials said. The first was Obama and fewer than 14 senior officials in government. The second was a team of operations specialists at the CIA, NSA and FBI who took direction from the task force on where to aim their subsequent efforts to collect more intelligence on Russia.
The number of Obama administration officials who were allowed access to the Russia intelligence was also highly limited, the Post reported. At first only four senior officials were involved, and not Biden. Those officials were CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and then-FBI Director James Comey. Their aides were all barred from attending the initial meetings, the Post stated.

Quote:

The secrecy extended into the White House.

Rice and White House homeland-security adviser Lisa Monaco convened meetings in the Situation Room to weigh the mounting evidence of Russian interference and generate options for how to respond.

At first, only four senior security officials were allowed to attend: Brennan, Clapper, Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and FBI Director James B. Comey. Aides ordinarily allowed entry as "plus-ones" were barred.

Gradually, the circle widened to include Vice President Biden and others. Agendas sent to Cabinet secretaries including John F. Kerry at the State Department and Ashton B. Carter at the Pentagon arrived in envelopes that subordinates were not supposed to open. Sometimes the agendas were withheld until participants had taken their seats in the Situation Room.
Quote:

Adding another layer of secrecy, the newspaper reported that when the closed cabinet sessions on Russia began in the White House Situation Room in August, the video feed from the main room was cut off during the meetings.

The feed, which allows only for video and not audio, is usually kept on so that senior aides can see when a meeting takes place.
Quote:

3 Biden's national security adviser participated in secretive early Russia probe meetings.
Colin Kahl, who served as then-Vice President Biden's national security adviser, reportedly participated in the secretive and highly compartmentalized early principals' meetings described above in #2.
The detail was contained in the March 2018 book Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump by Michael Isikoff, chief investigative correspondent for Yahoo News, and David Corn, Washington bureau chief of Mother Jones.
Quote:

In discussing how to respond to the information gathered, Isikoff and Corn write, the traditional interagency process of deputy chiefs meeting to formulize options for the heads of agencies also referred to as principals was bypassed for a more secretive route.
They write:
Quote:

Usually, when the White House invited the deputies and principals to such meetings, they informed them of the subject at hand and provided "read ahead" memos outlining what was on the agenda. This time, the agency officials just received instructions to show up at the White House at a certain time. No reason given. No memos supplied. "We were only told that a meeting was scheduled and our principal or deputy was expected to attend," recalled a senior administration official who participated in the sessions.

LINK

If Biden is ever asked about any of this, he'll get the deer in the headlights look.

Biden's sudden drafting last summer has never felt like an accident to me. I don't think it had much of anything to do with the Dem machine thinking they could beat Trump with a dementia riddled creepy old guy.

To me, with everything else we know about this, that decision has been all about protecting Obama and his entire crew of criminals from being taken down. They think they can all hide behind election year interference and spinning this all as Trump using Barr as a political weapon in a campaign year.

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-moving-full-throttle-on-russia-probe-review-with-top-federal-prosecutors-involved-sources

Quote:

...Two sources told Fox News that Jeff Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was tapped by the Justice Department in February to review the case of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, is continuing to help with Durham's investigation even after the DOJ's move last week to drop the case against Flynn.

The sources told Fox News that interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy Shea is also assisting with components of the investigation.

"They farmed the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn't want to be distracted," one of the sources told Fox News....

Yup! Lots of different actors involved...lots of moving parts. That's why it is taking so long.
First Page Last Page
Page 1093 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.