Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,728,663 Views | 49402 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by nortex97
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/05/10/lawfareblog-doubles-down-with-an-actual-legal-author-but-gets-same-results/

More throwing mud at Lawfare.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houag80 said:

Hillary's post election night meltdown comments are proving to be quite prophetic. IIRC the words were, "if I lose we will all swing from nooses". Cue the boy praying with dog meme....

To be fair she supposedly said it after the awful Matt Lauer interview to her staffers but since she doesn't allow anyone to carry electronic devices there's no recording of it. To me the most interesting part was what happened to Matt and if Hillary orchestrated it (not saying Matt was innocent but wouldn't surprise me if they have files on everyone for just such a purpose).
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lol, no way will Biden be able to stay on script for those questions.
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hadn't read that Wapo article but what a revelation. All of that high level meeting and coordinating in "the cone of silence" while at the same time having NO EVIDENCE. So what was it all about then? Surely all these high level people wouldn't get so secretively involved in something when they all knew, and confessed, there was nothing to indicate collusion.
It strongly suggests the deliberate planning of a coup.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sterling82 said:

I hadn't read that Wapo article but what a revelation. All of that high level meeting and coordinating in "the cone of silence" while at the same time having NO EVIDENCE. So what was it all about then? Surely all these high level people wouldn't get so secretively involved in something when they all knew, and confessed, there was nothing to indicate collusion.
It strongly suggests the deliberate planning of a coup.
Or they just really enjoy smelling each other's farts. Because was the only useful thing they were doing during those meetings.

Even turning off the audio and video so aides were kept in the dark again reinforces that they were well aware they were engaging in a conspiracy.
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:


aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We need to keep an eye on what the Senate does with FISA reform.

Quote:

The Senate is set to revive a fight over a shadowy surveillance court, bringing to a head a months-long stalemate that resulted in the lapse of three intelligence programs.

The looming debate, which will pit some of President Trump's biggest allies against one another, comes on the heels of growing questions about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court after the Justice Department inspector general found widespread errors as part of an interim report on warrant applications.

Leadership wants to pass a House-passed bill that pairs a reauthorization of the intelligence programs with some changes to the FISA process.
Quote:

The House bill, which cleared that chamber in March in a 278-136 vote, will "increase transparency in the FISA process and respond to the shameful abuses of 2016 while preserving the toolbox that professionals use to defend us," McConnell said from the Senate floor late last week.

The House bill reauthorizes one program dealing with "roving" wiretaps, which track individuals across multiple devices, and a second on surveilling "lone wolf" suspects not connected to a known terrorist group.

It would also reauthorize Section 215, which allows the government to request "tangible things" such as documents relevant to a national security investigation but makes changes including ending a controversial call records program. The three programs expired in mid-March; the Senate passed a short-term extension, but it was not taken up by the House.
LINK
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or they just really enjoy smelling each other's farts. Because was the only useful thing they were doing during those meetings.

No...that would be illegal!
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Indictments and prosecutions of key players, not underlings is the only thing that is going to perhaps make a dent. The job the media and Dems have done convincing many in the public that Trump and Russia colluded has been thorough. This story is not an easy one to unwind and the Dems are counting on that convoluted mess + now a timely (for them) pandemic to having this all be still played out as some Trump conspiracy.

Barr, Durham must bring high level indictments and Senate and House Republicans are going to have to keep their backbone in any hearings.

Otherwise aside from Trimp supporters this will end up going nowhere and will truly be lost to history if Dems win in Nov.
CT75
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

When is the public going to finally understand that these arent 'incidents' or 'scandals'.

When are people going to cease being surprised at the 'incompetence' 'hypocisy' etc.,

There actually is a swamp
It actually is filled with compromised people pursuing foreign, anti american agendas

They actually do control most media/entertainment/education/dc elected positions and political appointments.

Projection/key words triggering classic liberal american emotions are part of thier tool kit.

'Danger to rule of law'
'Worst since watergate'
Etc., all that is key word triggering their classic american democrat ideals.
It is triggered to maintain their sucker vote, and keep those suckers from inderstanding that the modern dnc amd many republicans as well are active, corrupt, compromised anti american actors, and the control of america by such scumbags is the worst thing in all of american history.

These 'scandals' and 'incidents' are not isolated. They are all just pieces of the puzzle.


When the MSM starts saying such...until then they won't unfortunately. The MSM controls the sheeple narrative.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honestly we should amend the constitution. No one should be able to hold any office if they have any relationship to foreign money or interests of any kind. And the oath needs to be specified to preclude diminishing privaxy or any of the bill of rights.

And violation or abuse of government power should be given reduced burden of proof and severe punishment including death penalty.
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1259582006784032770.html
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Quote:

CNN's "Reliable Sources" anchor Brian Stelter criticized conservative news outlets for their "obsession" over the new revelations regarding the Russia election interference investigations and the Department of Justice dropping its case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Stelter said the outlets should be more focused on the death toll from the ongoing Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah sure okay. He spends 3 years breathlessly reporting (and I use the term loosely) on collusion and now has the gall to lecture conservative media on what they cover. Do these people have no shame? It would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:




Quote:

CNN's "Reliable Sources" anchor Brian Stelter criticized conservative news outlets for their "obsession" over the new revelations regarding the Russia election interference investigations and the Department of Justice dropping its case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Stelter said the outlets should be more focused on the death toll from the ongoing Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.

hawk1689
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sterling82 said:

Do these people have no shame? It would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.


No, they don't.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hawk1689 said:

Sterling82 said:

Do these people have no shame? It would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.


No, they don't.
But they do have an apparent access to an exclusive guts' store. Else how do you explain having the guts it takes to beclown yourself on national TV night after night?
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

CNN's "Reliable Sources" anchor Brian Stelter criticized conservative news outlets for their "obsession" over the new revelations regarding the Russia election interference investigations and the Department of Justice dropping its case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Stelter said the outlets should be more focused on the death toll from the ongoing Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
The gov has flattened the curve, pumped mega-$'s into economy, built up PPE supplies, improved testing, and prevented hospitals from being overrun.

Mission accomplished.

Life goes on ... except for those in Durham's cross-hairs.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Life goes on ... except for those in Durham's cross-hairs.
Yeah they will have a new normal-normal.

ETA: Or is that more of a new-new normal?
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1259601939937087490.html
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trash

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Missed"

Pffft....
AW 1880
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Journalism is dead. The amount of half-truths and misleading videos/pictures/headlines in the last three months is astounding. It's been going on a while, but traditional media heavy weights (CBS, NBC, and CNN) have lost whatever journalistic integrity they had.
wyoag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the sake of America, the media needs to be held accountable. None of this **** could have happened without a corrupt media.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sure hope someone is compiling copious amounts of misdeeds by the media.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AW 1880 said:

Journalism is dead. The amount of half-truths and misleading videos/pictures/headlines in the last three months is astounding. It's been going on a while, but traditional media heavy weights (CBS, NBC, and CNN) have lost whatever journalistic integrity they had.
They are just responding to the call of their master.

redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You should change that to say "clownbell"
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was inadvertent I tell ya! Never mind that the following question targeted the "inadvertent" omission. Again, it was "inadvertent"! Coulda happened to anybody.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Throwback Thursday, but on a Sunday.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ccaggie05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember asking this about 1-2 years ago, but I was curious what the best books, if any, are regarding this whole Spygate/FISA/Flynn etc... situation.

I saw Andrew McCarthy from NR has one, "Ball of Collusion" and Dan Bongino has a couple on the topic. Anybody else? I've already read the related books by Gregg Jarrett.

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GreyhoundDad said:

That long article about Spygate makes it easy to see how they got Roberts to uphold Obamacare. Every one of those illegal queries, 10's of 1,000's, was for a nefarious purpose.
Makes you wonder what they have on Romney.
First Page Last Page
Page 1092 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.