I think Grenell wants to make Schiff do it with the idea that Schiff may endure political backlash from it. I'm really starting to like this man Grenell.
Grenell is being a consummate professional, offering Schiff the chance to commit Repicide, instead of him (Grenell) bearing the guilty verdict from the Court of Public Opinion.Quote:
Why wait?
Pull the trigger.
Not a damn thing, but it looks like Grenell has things under control.Ellis Wyatt said:What are you going to do about it?VegasAg86 said:
They've already had the vote to release them. How can he block their release after the vote?
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/06/adam-schiff-russia-richard-grenell/Quote:
The transcripts are of interviews with several Obama administration officials, including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, and Samantha Power, former Trump White House officials and several Trump associates.
The committee also interviewed the two lawyers at the firm Perkins Coie who financed the infamous Steele dossier. Transcripts for the lawyers, Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann, are included in the yet-to-be-released tranche of documents.
Like Tucker Carlson, Grenell may politely eviscerate so many idiot reporters that may not be enough in DC to cover the news...akm91 said:
Here's the tweet the @**h*t, steve pasquale, posted that Grenell responded to. Of course the jerk deleted it. For some reason these idiots think delete means it is gone. The internet is forever.
What is a Steven Pasquale?akm91 said:
Here's the tweet the @**h*t, steve pasquale, posted that Grenell responded to.
Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
Grenell is correct.SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
LOL....oops...SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
That's from the Politico article, linked in the tweet will posted.Quote:
The unredacted bullet points include four names, beginning with former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page. It tasks Mueller with determining whether Page committed a crime by "colluding with Russian government officials" as they interfered in the 2016 election.
Mueller was also tasked with investigating whether former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort likewise colluded with the Russian government, whether he committed crimes related to his work in Ukraine, and whether he committed a crime by taking loans from a bank CEO who was pursuing a job in the Trump administration.
The memo makes the same collusion allegation regarding former Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopolous, and also asks Mueller to look into whether he was an unregistered agent of the government of Israel.
The memo asks Mueller to probe four questions regarding Michael Flynn, the former Trump national security adviser who was fired less than a month into the job: whether he committed crimes by talking to Russian government officials during the Trump transition, whether he lied to the FBI about contacts he had with the Russian government, whether he failed to report foreign contacts and income on his background investigation application and whether he did not properly register as an agent for the Turkish government.
And explains why it would still be redacted. Only other person that I can think of that would justify the redaction now is Flynn Jr. since he was never charged.VegasAg86 said:
I was half jesting when I said Donald J Trump for the fifth target, but it almost has to be, doesn't it? How else to you get a special counsel for this? None of the other four targets come close to needing a special counsel to investigate. Yes, we know they charges are mostly lies, but even if true, no special counsel was needed.
I am going to answer just you, but the intended audience includes every other poster piling on as well...VegasAg86 said:SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
Your the DNI? Grenell is absolutely correct.
Don't worry brother, this was minimal. I saw our stock trading thread had 40 new posts yesterday and it was almost 2 pages of why a Peloton vs. Zwift for training is better, etc. This one didn't even last half a page.SeMgCo87 said:I am going to answer just you, but the intended audience includes every other poster piling on as well...VegasAg86 said:SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
Your the DNI? Grenell is absolutely correct.
Oops! I never looked at the first word of his very idiotic post, just the last part.
can we at least not pay pensions to them?aggiehawg said:No. But if things like this continue to come out, the best we can hope for is that the worst perpetrators from Team Mueller become wards of the state at a federal penitentiary.akm91 said:
Can we, the taxpayers, get a refund on the $40M the Mueller and his merry band of thieves spent?
SeMgCo87 said:I am going to answer just you, but the intended audience includes every other poster piling on as well...VegasAg86 said:SeMgCo87 said:Based on the usage in Pasquale's tweet, I think Grenell is incorrect, but it still makes for a good caning of an idiot reporter...pagerman @ work said:Quote:
PS: it's "you're"
Your the DNI? Grenell is absolutely correct.
Oops! I never looked at the first word of his very idiotic post, just the last part.
Quote:
Then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein instructed Special Counsel Robert Mueller in August 2017 to investigate allegations against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page that originated with the Steele dossier and had already been discredited by the FBI, a newly declassified memo showed Wednesday night.
The Justice Department's release of the unredacted version of Rosenstein's so-called investigative scoping memo provided the first declarative evidence that Mueller was asked to investigate widely suspect allegations from Christopher Steele's opposition research conducted for the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party back in 2016.
Specifically, Rosenstein's memo instructed Mueller to investigate "allegations that Carter Page committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law."
By the time that instruction was given, the FBI had fired Steele as an informant for leaking, interviewed Steele's sub-source who disputed information attributed to him and had ascertain that allegations Steele had given the FBI specifically about Page were inaccurate and likely came from Russian intelligence sources as disinformation, recently declassified evidence showed....