Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,730,242 Views | 49406 Replies | Last: 20 hrs ago by Garrelli 5000
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to redsquirrelAG • 9:40a, 5/3/20
You are free to say why you like. And staff is free to get rid of it. They should delete this entire Q derail. (I'm sorry I participated in this and will stop now)

You are trying to give fantasty credibility by acting like the threads align. They align as much as Ben Affleck's movie aligns with the actual events at Pearl Harbor
Reply Quote
11
2 edits
redsquirrelAG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 9:57a, 5/3/20
AG
To each his own. I'll stop. I'm excited for the next few months. I believe this is the tip of the spear in bringing back an era of justice and accountability in the rule of law among our politicians. Long overdue. Enjoy your Sunday.
Reply Quote
12
SeMgCo87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 11:09a, 5/3/20
AG
BMX Bandit said:
redsquirrelAG said:
Rapier108 said:
Can we please keep the "Q" junk on its thread.


Very troubled mindset to be that threatened. What will happen to your world when it becomes even more clear? Holier than...arrogance. time to be humbled.


No one is threatened.

The Q nerds cried and got a safe space for themselves. Go over there if you want to keep up the fantasy.

The hard work done by the people often linked on this thread (and some posters here also) is why all of this is exposed.

Not a picture of a donut from 2018 with the words "red October"
I started the Qanon thread, dimwit, and there was no crying about it.

The thread "the safe space to critique the q worshippers" was created by "SquirrellyDan", because a lot of trolls (possibly him?) and other ad hominem attacks by drive-by shooters on the Qanon thread posters got them a 3 day vacation. And that was from crying about getting booted off.

So quit mixing it up...are obfuscation and diversion two of your specialties? Apparently so.

By the way, I understand that Vitamin E helps lessen the effects of memory loss. It might help you to remember the content in other threads, and their titles.



Reply Quote
10
TripleSec
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:13a, 5/3/20
AG
I do like having the thread separate with the q stuff together and the investigation stuff together. You have to admit though, the stuff q said or the analysis of that is all becoming true on this thread. What we are just finding out through facts, q has been saying for a while.

These threads, while separate, are actually pretty much saying the same thing.

I still do like the separate thread though to keep the information organized.

Reply Quote
15
SeMgCo87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TripleSec • 11:20a, 5/3/20
AG
TripleSec said:
What we are just finding out through facts, q has been saying for a while.
Reply Quote
8
MooreTrucker
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TripleSec • 11:28a, 5/3/20
AG
TripleSec said:
I do like having the thread separate with the q stuff together and the investigation stuff together. You have to admit though, the stuff q said or the analysis of that is all becoming true on this thread. What we are just finding out through facts, q has been saying for a while.

These threads, while separate, are actually pretty much saying the same thing.

I still do like the separate thread though to keep the information organized.

Agreed, but I don't think it hurts to occasionally point out where the two intersect. And other than this complaining derail, it's not cluttering up this thread at all.

And if it offends you, BMX, just keep scrolling. Same with any other thread in TexAgs.
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Tailgate88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MooreTrucker • 11:38a, 5/3/20
AG
Agree. There have been several times over the past couple years where it has been correctly pointed out that the two threads were converging. No harm in mentioning it when it happens.
Reply Quote
3
TripleSec
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:42a, 5/3/20
AG
No offense taken here. What's more offensive is the bickering about it more than the cross thread postings themselves.
Reply Quote
3
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:46a, 5/3/20
AG
What about pointing it out over there where it is on topic vs here where it doesn't add new information to the topic
Reply Quote
6
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:06p, 5/3/20


I love Maria and she took Lindsay to the woodshed.
Reply Quote
8
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ProgN • 12:23p, 5/3/20
AG
Prognightmare said:


I love Maria and she took Lindsay to the woodshed.
Maria was good but she should have gone further.

Graham says he's not going to interrupt an ongoing investigation. Durham's investigation is a criminal investigation. It's not to determine whether people should be fired or not or determine if and how the FBI is to be restructured. Graham can hold hearings now to hold Wray's feet to the fire based on the Horowitz report and demand to know why Wray said things are hunky dory when they're obviously not. Every one of the FISA requests were bull ***** Congress has oversight on that and they have oversight of the FBI. Do your job Lindsay Graham!
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Reply Quote
4
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:34p, 5/3/20


(Short video)

Well, well...it seems the CIA had good evidence that the Russians wanted Hillary to win, but Brennan squelched it. The report is hung up in the CIA. Will Grenell release it? This would blow Obama's Intelligence Community Assessment out of the water.
Reply Quote
12
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 5/3/20


As you can see, this email is authentic & from Sidney Powell's court memo. So, Pientka went to the IG over the altering of Flynn's original 302...if the NYTs is to be believed. Hmmm.... Remember back in January Sidney stated that she had a witness to Flynn's original 302. You don't suppose that Pientka is that witness?
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 4:29p, 5/3/20
AG
Quote:
As you can see, this email is authentic & from Sidney Powell's court memo. So, Pientka went to the IG over the altering of Flynn's original 302...if the NYTs is to be believed. Hmmm.... Remember back in January Sidney stated that she had a witness to Flynn's original 302. You don't suppose that Pientka is that witness?
And the freaking NYT knew that in January 2018?
Reply Quote
8
SeMgCo87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:35p, 5/3/20
AG
aggiehawg said:
Quote:
As you can see, this email is authentic & from Sidney Powell's court memo. So, Pientka went to the IG over the altering of Flynn's original 302...if the NYTs is to be believed. Hmmm.... Remember back in January Sidney stated that she had a witness to Flynn's original 302. You don't suppose that Pientka is that witness?
And the freaking NYT knew that in January 2018?
Well, they were being very careful about confirming the source.

As is their policy, of course...
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:52p, 5/3/20
YUGE if true....



Reply Quote
5
1 edit
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:00p, 5/3/20
"Seem to point" and "may have been" will have to do until I can see the documents. I suspect it's an indirect indication Obama was in the middle of Spygate, even though he's in it up to his eyeballs.

Don't misunderstand me, I'm thrilled there's something that points in his direction, I just want to see the docs.
Reply Quote
8
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:03p, 5/3/20
AG
Documents released? Where?
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TexAgs91 • 5:08p, 5/3/20
AG
TexAgs91 said:
Documents released? Where?
Good question. From previously released docs? Docs that people are now drilling down on? Or a new batch?
Reply Quote
3
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:10p, 5/3/20
AG
This may take more than the 48 hour rule. Maybe the 48 day rule. Can't get this wrong.
Trump can't afford to touch this until it's locked down tight. It would end his re-election if he was wrong.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
FbgTxAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:17p, 5/3/20
AG
Oh please.

Jim Comey, John Brennan, Susan Rice, Joe Biden and Hilliary Clinton could ALL flip and finger Obama and not one single media outlet would publish it, not one judge would hear the case, not one prosecutor would try prosecute it.

Dude is playing golf, chooming, and giving all of us the middle finger while on our dime for 40 more years.
The greatest argument ever made against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter.
Reply Quote
14
Eagle2020
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 6:24p, 5/3/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
This may take more than the 48 hour rule. Maybe the 48 day rule. Can't get this wrong.
Trump can't afford to touch this until it's locked down tight. It would end his re-election if he was wrong.

Trump has known since January, 2017 that Obama was behind it. He told Michelle a long time ago that he would never forgive Hussein for what her husband did and tried to do. Trump knows everything and he is using that info in ways we will never know. I think that is the main reason this has drug out for so long. Trump is getting as much mileage out of it as possible.
Reply Quote
10
MooreTrucker
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FbgTxAg • 6:58p, 5/3/20
AG

nm
Reply Quote
1 edit
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:23p, 5/3/20
will25u said:
YUGE if true....



Maybe referring to a post by Secolobo;
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/2912732/replies/56475832

https://twitter.com/bhweingarten/status/1255916279325700097/photo/1

Quote:
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 7:27p, 5/3/20
AG
To think the WH was NOT involved defies all logic
Reply Quote
14
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 7:35p, 5/3/20
captkirk said:
To think the WH was NOT involved defies all logic
Agreed: I was just pondering if those new documents they are referring to were the ones Secolobo provided a link to.?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
3
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 7:50p, 5/3/20
captkirk said:
To think the WH was NOT involved defies all logic
And that's the reason every Dem doesn't believe it, no logic.

Or, it's just malice aforethought, and they know, but as usual, it's a means to an end.
Reply Quote
2
whatthehey78
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:10p, 5/3/20
AG
Soooooo many facts, so much detail, reams of data proving Deep State corruption and SOOOOOOOO little action!

Will the Dam ever break?
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:10a, 5/4/20
ImperatorRexx putting more pieces together?

Reply Quote
3
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:39a, 5/4/20


https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/495718-michael-flynn-case-places-both-fbi-integrity-and-civil-liberty-on-the-line

Quote:
...Lying to the FBI is not a federal crime unless the lie is actually material to an investigation. Thus, if the FBI is investigating terrorism, and the subject falsely denies an extramarital affair, his lie would not be material. So is a lie material when the FBI already knows the truth because it has it on tape? Is it material if the only reason the FBI asked the question was not to get the subject to provide truthful information but to get him to lie?...

Alan Dershowitz on Flynn.
Reply Quote
4
benchmark
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:43a, 5/4/20
AG
Good John Solomon read ...

Pressure Mounts On Wray As FBI behavior in Russia Case Comes Into Clearer Focus
Quote:
Back in early 2018, the FBI under newly minted Director Chris Wray issued an extraordinarily rare public rebuke of a sitting House committee chairman.

Then-House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes had just issued a memo concluding that the FBI under Wray's predecessor, James Comey, abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act process to improperly spy on President Trump's campaign.

Wray fired back, even though the issues didn't happen on his watch, suggesting Nunes had given an inaccurate picture to the American public.

"We have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy," the bureau said in a statement that reverberated across America, especially with mainstream media that had pushed the faulty Russia collusion narrative for months.

Now two years later, Nunes' memo has been vindicated by the belated release of classified information and a Justice Department inspector general's report that confirmed systematic FISA abuses and much wider problems inside the FBI.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:50a, 5/4/20
Something for a while has been nagging at me in regards to Wray....

President Trump is not shy about firing someone. And there is nothing(that I see) holding President Trump back from firing Wray. I think the reason it took so long to fire Comey was because of how it would look. But unless I am missing something, there shouldn't be anything holding President Trump back from firing Wray.

So why has he not done it? If he is undermining things in the background, why not get rid of him?

It is a little perplexing to me.
Reply Quote
4
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:51a, 5/4/20
AG
Very good question
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:03a, 5/4/20
AG
It's a great question. Trump and Barr have actually lavished a lot of praise on Wray. Only explanations I can figure that make any likely sense are (a) keep him employed so he can't pull a Comey and refuse to have his security clearance reinstated for interviews, and (b) wanting to manage the timing of his dismissal.

My concern is that Trump doesn't realize how feckless and duplicitous Wray really has been with the investigation, FISA-gate, etc.
Reply Quote
5
BillYeoman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:08a, 5/4/20
will25u said:
Something for a while has been nagging at me in regards to Wray....

President Trump is not shy about firing someone. And there is nothing(that I see) holding President Trump back from firing Wray. I think the reason it took so long to fire Comey was because of how it would look. But unless I am missing something, there shouldn't be anything holding President Trump back from firing Wray.

So why has he not done it? If he is undermining things in the background, why not get rid of him?

It is a little perplexing to me.


I personally believe Trump is getting out of the way and let justice/facts speak for themselves. A couple of months ago after a Trump comment/tweet Barr said Trump was making it difficult for him to do his job.

Justice is now slowly but surely being delivered. Trump is playing this smart with Flynn. He is playing this smart with Wray. He is letting Barr/Durham do their work which should be finalized this summer.

Last thing anyone wants is the appearance of Trump leaning on the scales of Justice on this one. This is a massive scandal that only law can rectify.
Reply Quote
16
First Page Last Page
Page 1070 of 1412 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.