Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,730,861 Views | 49406 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Garrelli 5000
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

will25u said:


Not me.

My first reaction was: "holy sh_t" those dumb-asses actually left a paper trail and no one shredded it. My second reaction was; who sandbagged the evidence?
lol, no doubt. This was well after "they never thought she'd lose".
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texaggierm said:

Are those initials at the top of pg 4? EP? Any idea who that is?

https://www.scribd.com/document/459057200/doc-188




Bill Priestap's notes.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VegasAg86 said:

How can their "goal" be anything other than "to find out the facts"? I know, that's naive, but this is a pretty disgusting abuse of power.
Because nothing the Obama regime or any of his acolytes did was about what was right. Everything he did was for nefarious purposes.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

If Trump wants people to see what actually happened to Flynn, he needs to pardon him immediately. Force the media to cover it.
Better to wait until all the evidence is public and the case is dismissed ... then pardon him a week later to get 2+ weeks in the news cycle.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
benchmark said:

will25u said:


Not me.

My first reaction was: "holy sh_t" those dumb-asses actually left a paper trail and no one shredded it. My second reaction was; who sandbagged the evidence?
They were arrogant enough to believe their ability to overturn the results of the election would render the need to destroy any evidence moot.

They also underestimated Trump's intelligence, both his own and those few individuals he could actually trust in those early days.

These folks were sheltered in their unethical activities by Holder and Lynch for 8 years. They grew comfortable in that regard and as a consequence evolved into a very undisciplined and erratic group of conspirators.

That is where I'm at.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

VegasAg86 said:

How can their "goal" be anything other than "to find out the facts"? I know, that's naive, but this is a pretty disgusting abuse of power.
Because nothing the Obama regime or any of his acolytes did was about what was right. Everything he did was for nefarious purposes.
Nothing worse than a progressive Ivory Tower academic put in control of the White House.





They believe Constitutional restraints are antiquated and that attitude filters down to everyone in their operation.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1254191727818297344.html

Now that you are worked up over Flynn, here's a very interesting thread that will tie up a number of things, like the Logan Act mentioned in the handwritten notes. If you remember, July 31, 2016 was when Crossfire Hurricane became operational with CI investigations opened up on 4 people. Almost immediately Halper was activated as a CHS. There was a chap named Adam Lovinger who began to blow the whistle on Halper's contracts with ONA (Col James Baker) in the fall of 2016. Lovinger was then mysteriously set up for a potential criminal act. Turns out Lovinger was programmed to go to work with Flynn as a senior director when Flynn became NSA. The Logan Act business ties in Baker, Clapper, Yates & David Ignatius of the WaPo & you can see it in play in Priestap's handwritten notes. The point being, Lovinger eventually would expose Halper to Flynn which would lead to uncovering the dossier & the SpyGate plot. A rather convincing hypothesis with plenty of smoke.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That picture of Clapper and Yates!

I've always thought Clapper and Yates are culpable, but every Clapper pic looks like an old man who chose to go along for the ride, in lieu of his better judgment. Yates just looks arrogant, manipulative, and what I suspect she probably is, a highly partisan government executive willing to sacrifice her country for how she views the world.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorse05 said:

That picture of Clapper and Yates!

I've always thought Clapper and Yates are culpable, but every Clapper pic looks like an old man who chose to go along for the ride, in lieu of his better judgment. Yates just looks arrogant, manipulative, and what I suspect she probably is, a highly partisan government executive willing to sacrifice her country for how she views the world.
But mostly, willing to sacrifice her country to get her cut. These people were committing these crimes for something far bigger than political ideology.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prognightmare said:




That is a pretty long a damning article in this day and age.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:

The point being, Lovinger eventually would expose Halper to Flynn which would lead to uncovering the dossier & the SpyGate plot. A rather convincing hypothesis with plenty of smoke.
Wow! Your detective bulletin board must be like 3 walls of suspects and witnesses.

Good read on Lovinger (link): The Strange Case of Adam Lovinger: How Security Clearances of Trump Officials Are Politicized
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good point!

I forgot about the monetary aspect. Except for Sanders, who was a genuine socialist before he got his 2nd house, the only reason Dems go into government is to get rich.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
benchmark said:

drcrinum said:

The point being, Lovinger eventually would expose Halper to Flynn which would lead to uncovering the dossier & the SpyGate plot. A rather convincing hypothesis with plenty of smoke.
Wow! Your detective bulletin board must be like 3 walls of suspects and witnesses.

Good read on Lovinger (link): The Strange Case of Adam Lovinger: How Security Clearances of Trump Officials Are Politicized
Jeff Carlson does excellent investigative work -- good read.
There's a lot more to the saga of Lovinger -- it has to do with the government hiding evidence at a trial. Sound familiar?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/14/investigation-clears-analyst-accused-of-leaking-da/
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Yup!
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Prior to my education through this thread, I would have felt the same way. I trust my local cops to an extent because I know most of them. Get past that and I am not talking to anyone voluntarily or without a lawyer. Lesson learned. Feel really bad for Flynn and everything that this patriot has gone through. Just a shame and there should be some sort of retribution.
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Breaking news - hannity has family in law enforcement!

Every freakin night.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't watch then.
DamnGood86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3 Toed Pete said:


......mostly, willing to sacrifice her country to get her cut. These people were committing these crimes for something far bigger than political ideology.

Bingo. The whole GD thing is corrupt to high heaven; do not be so naive you doubt that.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This isn't the ***** about Hannity thread.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
lcraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3 Toed Pete said:

Breaking news - hannity has family in law enforcement!

Every freakin night.
If Hannity would allow his guests to talk, it might be nice to hear them complete a sentence.
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


Eagle2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish Gen Flynn could get 5 mins in a room with any of these F'ers, no questions asked.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1254191727818297344.html

Now that you are worked up over Flynn, here's a very interesting thread that will tie up a number of things, like the Logan Act mentioned in the handwritten notes. If you remember, July 31, 2016 was when Crossfire Hurricane became operational with CI investigations opened up on 4 people. Almost immediately Halper was activated as a CHS. There was a chap named Adam Lovinger who began to blow the whistle on Halper's contracts with ONA (Col James Baker) in the fall of 2016. Lovinger was then mysteriously set up for a potential criminal act. Turns out Lovinger was programmed to go to work with Flynn as a senior director when Flynn became NSA. The Logan Act business ties in Baker, Clapper, Yates & David Ignatius of the WaPo & you can see it in play in Priestap's handwritten notes. The point being, Lovinger eventually would expose Halper to Flynn which would lead to uncovering the dossier & the SpyGate plot. A rather convincing hypothesis with plenty of smoke.

The extent of the corruption in his organization, and the willingness of Baker to set him up for the fall instead of fixing the problem, makes one wonder just who was making money off the presence of substandard contractors providing mediocre product at exorbitant cost?

We have an epic fail in our bureaucracy across multiple departments and at multiple levels of administration.

Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stlkofta said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

VegasAg86 said:

How can their "goal" be anything other than "to find out the facts"? I know, that's naive, but this is a pretty disgusting abuse of power.
Because nothing the Obama regime or any of his acolytes did was about what was right. Everything he did was for nefarious purposes.
Nothing worse than a progressive Ivory Tower academic put in control of the White House.





They believe Constitutional restraints are antiquated and that attitude filters down to everyone in their operation.


And the jackass was a constitutional law professor.
Can I go to sleep Looch?
Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems like 'fail' is too genteel a word. This was a conspiracy across multiple departments at multiple levels.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Senor Cardgage said:

It seems like 'fail' is too genteel a word. This was a conspiracy across multiple departments at multiple levels.
Thing is they couldn't even handle a conspiracy with anything approaching competence.

Heaven help when the next gutless Democrat takes the White House.

We are screwed beyond comprehension when that happens.

Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To me, a failure is when something unintentional happens. Like when weapons from the US end up in the hands of drug cartels, for example.

Oh, wait...

But I get your point and I agree.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Senor Cardgage said:

To me, a failure is when something unintentional happens. Like when weapons from the US end up in the hands of drug cartels, for example.

Oh, wait...

But I get your point and I agree.
They have left an evidence trail wider than Texas and deeper than the Grand Canyon.

I have complete confidence in Durham. After the events of the last few days, I'm pretty sure my frustration with Barr was misplaced. He was thinking tactically on a Nimitz-level while I was wanting to go Bull Halsey on these idiots.

Have a feeling we're at that part of a Chuck Norris movie where bad things get done to bad people.

I can't wait.



fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't we have both.

Bull Halsey would leave a lot of beat up and bruised souls!!
who?mikejones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tslking points starting to trickle:

This is standard operating procedure to any criminal investigation. Get them to lie or admit.
kag00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
who?mikejones said:

Tslking points starting to trickle:

This is standard operating procedure to any criminal investigation. Get them to lie or admit.


Well that a bunch of BS if it is supposed to be a defense. How about getting the truth!
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
who?mikejones said:

Tslking points starting to trickle:

This is standard operating procedure to any criminal investigation. Get them to lie or admit.

But Clapper told us they were trying to protect the Trump team. It's way past time for a national divorce.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
anyone familiar with this guy?

First Page Last Page
Page 1061 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.