Thank you for the information & link.aggiehawg said:
Fingers crossed this goes somewhere.Quote:
....Quote:
....LINKQuote:
....
Obligatory:
Aaaannnd Schiff is still a POS.
Gray mail. But the solution to that is a CIPA trial.nortex97 said:
The Senate Intel. committee is the epicenter of the swamp. Look how they got their boy Wolfe off even though he sent 82 classified pages to his lover/reporter and it was all documented.
His ace in the hole? Threatening to talk or compel testimony from Burr/Warner/Graham/Feinstein etc. I give the Senate Intel reports/words all of the credibility I do Paul Krugman's economic ideas.
What happens if someone from the ODNI (or even the HPSCI) leaks the unclassified transcripts anyway? (I mean, aside from Don Lemon lecturing us to not look at the transcripts, since they weren't supposed to be released.) Are there any consequences for the leaker once the horse is out of the barn?nortex97 said:
And...Schiff is still sleaze. Been sitting on declassified russiagate testimony of McCabe etc. for around a year likely, refuses to share publicly or with White House.Quote:
In late September 2018 with a mid-year election approaching, the often bitterly divided House Intelligence Committee forged a rare bipartisan moment: Its Republican and Democratic members voted to make public the transcripts of 53 witnesses in the Russia collusion investigation.
But what was hailed as an act of transparency has not been fulfilled 19 months later, even though U.S intelligence has declassified and cleared the transcripts for release.
The answer why lies in the backroom dealings of Adam Schiff, the committee's top Democrat and its current chairman, according to interviews and memos obtained by Just the News.
Shortly after Schiff took over from Republican Rep. Devin Nunes as chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in 2019, he sent a letter to the office of then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats.
The letter obtained by Just the News specifically ordered that the witness transcripts some of which contained exculpatory evidence for President Trump's team not be shared with Trump or White House lawyers even if the declassification process required such sharing.
"Under no circumstances shall ODNI, or any other element of the Intelligence Community (IC), share any HPSCI transcripts with the White House, President Trump or any persons associated with the White House or the President," Schiff wrote in a March 26, 2019 letter to then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats.
"Such transcripts remain the sole property of HPSCI, and were transmitted to ODNI for the limited purpose of enabling a classification review by IC elements and the Department of Justice," Schiff added.
Not if they use Wikileaks! They also get a paid for sex change operation, if they desire.Quote:
What happens if someone from the ODNI (or even the HPSCI) leaks the unclassified transcripts anyway? (I mean, aside from Don Lemon lecturing us to not look at the transcripts, since they weren't supposed to be released.) Are there any consequences for the leaker once the horse is out of the barn?
WTF is Herridge doing at CBS? An actual journalist over there is rarer than hen's teethdrcrinum said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/declassified-footnotes-shed-new-light-on-fbis-surveillance-of-trump-campaign/
Ten minute video. I can see the defense for the SpyGate plotters already. "We were misled by Russian disinformation."
drcrinum said:
When you watch the video, you can sense that the 2 talking heads are outside the box -- they don't know what to say in response to Herridge's commentary/reporting...sort of like Herridge was speaking in a foreign language. I suspect that someone in the background was feeding talking points to the 2 talking heads.
Sterling82 said:drcrinum said:
When you watch the video, you can sense that the 2 talking heads are outside the box -- they don't know what to say in response to Herridge's commentary/reporting...sort of like Herridge was speaking in a foreign language. I suspect that someone in the background was feeding talking points to the 2 talking heads.
It was almost amusing to watch them grapple with the facts. No doubt they really hadn't considered the possibility that it was in fact a "witch hunt". Herridge did a pretty good job of slowly pulling them into reality. Her being at CBS might end up helping to get their viewers out of the echo chamber.
Well mueller has never heard of fusion gps. Or joseph mifsud.MouthBQ98 said:
WTF? Anyone actually paying attention to politics knew that by 2017.
If a person "learned about it on the news" like Obama, he would have no idea that the FBI never examined the server. The press never actually reported that. (And yes, I think it's absurd that he "didn't know.")MouthBQ98 said:
WTF? Anyone actually paying attention to politics knew that by 2017.
who?mikejones said:
Schiff doing things:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/how-adam-schiff-secretly-thwarted-efforts-bring
The faces of true evil.Secolobo said:
This popped up on my timeline. Forgot about this and implications for the 2016 election.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/marc-turi-libyan-rebels-hillary-clinton-229115