https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1211822630619078657.html

Short thread. I would think this gal is legitimate & knows what she is talking about. She is a former CIA spy. You may have heard about her as she recently has been in the 'Italian' news. I suspect that she may have had her hand in Italian SpyGate dealings. Read the following article describing the details of her recent activities & see if you agree:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/sabrina-de-sousa-cia-spy-italy-milan-hassan-mustafa-osama-nasr-a9173296.html

Two articles in the above tweets that provide many clues that Eric Ciaramella has been a major figure in SpyGate & the Ukraine:
1)
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/30/judicial-watch-sues-doj-and-cia-for-documents-on-eric-ciaramella/

This isn't a typical Breibart article -- the author is Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch. Did you know Ciaramella is even mentioned in Horowitz's Report.

Quote:

---

...Thanks to the Obama Spygate scandal and the related abusive impeachment of President Trump, there is significant public interest in Ciaramella's activities. We know he was involved in the Russia collusion investigation, and he was a key CIA operative on Ukraine in the both the Obama and Trump White Houses. Our lawsuits are designed to break through the unprecedented cover-up of his activities.

---

2)
https://archive.is/JLK0t

Explains how Ciaramella made it into Trump's NSC, thanks to the snake General McMaster.

goodag90 said:

---

drcrinum,
Found the time last night to read your 'long, long post'. You do a better job researching than any journalist out there any provide analysis as well! An a former INTEL guy I appreciate your thorough approach. Thanks, GIG'EM and HOOAH!!!

---

I certainly couldn't have said it any better. Well done.

I do have a comment on A ND Magazine tweet. It states that "Durham's report will show..............". We know that Durham is prohibited by law to reveal his report, so I assume my quote above will only be for the elected officials, staff, and those with clearance? I ask because the quote makes it sound like everyone will get to see the results of Durham's work, which won't be the case, only the indictments.

Happy New Year!

BTW, #7---"The plot will be found to be ongoing" doesn't surprise me, and I'm very pleased to see others recognize this.

I've been continually astounded and bamboozled (talk about a word I never use) by revelations over the last two years that could only be the result of the coup operation still being conducted. As I read her tweet about Faddis' article, I had a very bad feeling about Trump's security in 2020.

Quote:

---

We know that Durham is prohibited by law to reveal his report, so I assume my quote above will only be for the elected officials, staff, and those with clearance? I ask because the quote makes it sound like everyone will get to see the results of Durham's work, which won't be the case, only the indictments.

---

It really is weird that people who should know better, parrot the same line about Durham writing a report for anyone other than Barr and his team. Sure, Durham is writing briefing memos to keep Barr abreast of the progress in his investigation but those are internal reports.

Quote:

---

Sure, Durham is writing briefing memos to keep Barr abreast of the progress in his investigation but those are internal reports.

---

You mean we should not look forward to a 4,000 page report, complete with 1,100 glossy colored photographs with circles and arrows, and explanations on the back???? What will happen to the Twitter-verse, especially drcrinum, not having all that source material to wrangle through for the next 11 months????

What is the world coming to...we are DOOMED!!

Quote:

---

You mean we should not look forward to a 4,000 page report, complete with 1,100 glossy colored photographs with circles and arrows, and explanations on the back????

---

Nice Officer Obie reference.

First thing I thought of.

You're too quick on the Enter button.

Yep, good movie and Album.

I also liked "The Motorcycle Song", and "City of New Orleans"

Judicial Watch has been extremely busy filing law suits against the Deep State this past year and being successful in prying out some valuable information about the Coup plotters. I would think some wealthy Pro-Trump Republican Donors have been helping to fund Judicial Watch, including some good security for Tom Fitton.

oysterbayAG said:

---

Judicial Watch has been extremely busy filing law suits against the Deep State this past year and being successful in prying out some valuable information about the Coup plotters. I would think some wealthy Pro-Trump Republican Donors have been helping to fund Judicial Watch, including some good security for Tom Fitton.

---

What I am amazed by is the amount of PUBLIC information that is out there. AND the amount a crowd sourced information that is gleaned from the public information.

To think of what Durham knows and will know...

I just hope all of this will lead to our country being purged of some corruption, and that some in the future can continue it after Trump is gone in 5 years.

oysterbayAG said:

---

Judicial Watch has been extremely busy filing law suits against the Deep State this past year and being successful in prying out some valuable information about the Coup plotters. I would think some wealthy Pro-Trump Republican Donors have been helping to fund Judicial Watch, including some good security for Tom Fitton.

---

Good point. I got my donation in to them just now. Need to keep them on my radar more often. We need to pool our money together to match what the dems do.

Quote:

---

We need to pool our money together to match what the dems do Soros does.

---

Let's personify the focus...you know Alinsky's Rules for Radicals #13...

Quote:

---

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions."

---

Soros is spending $/bribing local municipal officials like mad; in order to influence local voting processes...like mail-in voting. Mail-in votes are "provisional ballots", counted after the fact. And we never know what collection / archiving / retrieving / counting / certifying / reporting procedures are used (think of poor, innocent, overworked Dr. Brenda Snipes, Broward Cty, FL).

Am I saying Soros played a role in Broward results? Don't know, but one should be suspicious.

Because, until we as a society become overwhelmingly stupid and sanction an amendment to rescind the Electoral College requirement from Article 2 of the US Constitution, the way to offset its' effect on our national elections is to influence or rig the local elections...and in just a few States, too...like Texas and Florida.

And with Austin already radioactive blue, and Dallas, Houston and San Antonio glowing a deep bluish purple...

Take down Soros, shut down his Open Society efforts. This is why I think Barr & Durham will go after him, too.

SeMgCo87 said:

---

Quote:

---

We need to pool our money together to match what the dems do Soros does.

---

Let's personify the focus...you know Alinsky's Rules for Radicals #13...

Quote:

---

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions."

---

Soros is spending $/bribing local municipal officials like mad; in order to influence local voting processes...like mail-in voting. Mail-in votes are "provisional ballots", counted after the fact. And we never know what collection / archiving / retrieving / counting / certifying / reporting procedures are used (think of poor, innocent, overworked Dr. Brenda Snipes, Broward Cty, FL).

Am I saying Soros played a role in Broward results? Don't know, but one should be suspicious.

Because, until we as a society become overwhelmingly stupid and sanction an amendment to rescind the Electoral College requirement from Article 2 of the US Constitution, the way to offset its' effect on our national elections is to influence or rig the local elections...and in just a few States, too...like Texas and Florida.

And with Austin already radioactive blue, and Dallas, Houston and San Antonio glowing a deep bluish purple...

Take down Soros, shut down his Open Society efforts. This is why I think Barr & Durham will go after him, too.

---

Exactly. They have a very localized targeted approach. Great strategy actually and with the media turning a blind eye to it, the masses will never know

stetson said:

---

Quote:

---

Either your nations premiere law enforcement agency was breathtakingly incompetent when the stakes were the highest, or select officials in that organization made deliberate decisions to break the law, undermine the Constitution, and illegally spy on a fellow American.

---

Exactly. This is the elephant in the room that the MSM ignores.

---

And it's still the most difficult thing for me to wrap my head around. I get that power corrupts and the elected officials will always be selfish, always break laws, etc. But the whole idea of an independent, free press is to scrutinize and challenge all of this.

While I also understand that journos are largely liberal, I just can't believe they are all "victims of groupthink".

There has to be some mechanism pulling their collective strings to actively participate in this charade. And I also can't believe there aren't more independent-minded journos protesting this crap, breaking from the MSM, whistleblowing how corrupted the media has become. That baffles me.

In fairness to the journos, when so many of the groupthinkers are still getting prestigious news awards for reporting information from "their sources", I kind of have to admit I wouldn't stray too far from the accolades and money train.

Some of them are completely unaware of their lack of critical thinking, and then some are just lazy *******s happy to take a paycheck while waiting for the next DNC/Share Blue point to come out.

https://bongino.com/ep-1147-explosive-new-details-emerge-about-the-spying-operation-on-trump/

Listen from circa 7:30 to 32:00 minutes.
Interesting take on the origin of SpyGate: They were really after Flynn -- he was their first priority to surveil -- & they were using the Dossier info long before they claimed. Curious timing regarding the date of Steele's Dossier Report #101 dated August 10, 2016, where Flynn is mentioned the only time.

SeMgCo87 said:

---

Quote:

---

Sure, Durham is writing briefing memos to keep Barr abreast of the progress in his investigation but those are internal reports.

---

You mean we should not look forward to a 4,000 page report, complete with 1,100 glossy colored photographs with circles and arrows, and explanations on the back???? What will happen to the Twitter-verse, especially drcrinum, not having all that source material to wrangle through for the next 11 months????

What is the world coming to...we are DOOMED!!

---

Here's hoping these perpetrators get more than;

Quote:

---

fined $50 and had to pick up the garbage in the snow,

---

Quote:

---

Curious timing regarding the date of Steele's Dossier Report #101 dated August 10, 2016, where Flynn is mentioned the only time.

---

Right when the Inovo deal was being completed. The Turkish deal with Flynn's company. FARA set up.

I will post this point again because it will show the extent of the collusion by schiff and the dems to get Trump by any means necessary and what a sham impeachment it. The day after Trump's Ukraine phone call, schiff hired a NSC staffer, sean misko, who is very close friends and worked with ciaramella at the NSC.

Coincidence, right?

Evelyn Farkas & Burisma? Yes, she attended a forum in Ukraine where Burisma was a participant in April 2018; she was attending as a representative of the Atlantic Council, the latter sponsoring the event. You can read about it here:

https://kharkivobserver.com/us-atlantic-council-discusses-energy-security-in-kharkiv/

Farkas also stepped into the Ukrainian foray in support of Schiff & his Kangaroo Court several months ago; she wrote an opinion piece in the WaPo in support of the impeachment inquiry:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/26/we-aid-ukraine-help-it-fight-russia-by-holding-back-support-trump-helped-putin/

drcrinum said:

---

Evelyn Farkas & Burisma? Yes, she attended a forum in Ukraine where Burisma was a participant in April 2018; she was attending as a representative of the Atlantic Council, the latter sponsoring the event. You can read about it here:

https://kharkivobserver.com/us-atlantic-council-discusses-energy-security-in-kharkiv/

Farkas also stepped into the Ukrainian foray in support of Schiff & his Kangaroo Court several months ago; she wrote an opinion piece in the WaPo in support of the impeachment inquiry:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/26/we-aid-ukraine-help-it-fight-russia-by-holding-back-support-trump-helped-putin/

---

Farkas danged near blew the lid off FISA in early 2017...then went silent. Her mouth had engaged independently of any cerebral response (she does have that "clueless" look in her eyes).

Now, almost 3 years later, it appears it is happening again...except this time in pictures.

I am convinced that Bar & Durham are somehow dribbling some of this stuff out. I seem to remember that there were overlaps of evidence, and Durham had some kind of "taint" team/process going on, so that they could separate the "conflicted" evidence from evidence that was "clean".

Perhaps these are tidbits of "conflicted" evidence that will not be used, and is not only good to know, but can be disseminated to trusted journalists/bloggers/etc., who can blast it out to us commoners. All the while educating us about who are some of the "Persons of Interest" in their continuing investigations...

Kinda like what has been slung around in another thread for awhile...

https://monsieuramerica.com/2019/12/31/a-gentleman-never-tells/

Interesting point made in this article: There is no evidence that the Crossfire Hurricane Team ever ran a name-tracing query outside the FBI as to whether or not Mifsud had an affiliation with any other US government agency (CIA in particular), & they did not even run a name-tracing within the FBI for Person-1 (met with Papadoupolous = Sergei Millian, who was also suspected of being a source for Steele) whom Horowitz discovered was under a FISA during the period of interest.

One could even add General Flynn to the above: Per Page 60 of Horowitz, the EC for Flynn cited his trip to Moscow/Russia in December 2015. Had they run a name-tracing outside the FBI, they would have discovered his association/briefings with the DIA regarding his Moscow trip where he met Putin.

Sloppy work or faulty thinking or intentional disregard.

This Evelyn Farikas character must be the dumbest Deputy Assistant Secretary Of Defense in US history. The Deep State seems to be full of lightweight dummies. Durham & Barr must be overwhelmingly astounded at what they are finding out about The Spygate Coup Conspiracy !

oysterbayAG said:

---

This Evelyn Farikas character must be the dumbest Deputy Assistant Secretary Of Defense in US history. The Deep State seems to be full of lightweight dummies. Durham & Barr must be overwhelmingly astounded at what they are finding out about The Spygate Coup Conspiracy !

---

As usual, you never know, but I suspect Ole Evelyn is probably quite book smart and VERY long on wisdom, which is likely to change in the next two years.

Like so many Leftys, she's probably a benighted follower who just doesn't commiserate with anyone outside of her Dem cogniscenti. All of the talking points are more than that, they're gospel.

fasthorse05 said:

---

oysterbayAG said:

---

This Evelyn Farikas character must be the dumbest Deputy Assistant Secretary Of Defense in US history. The Deep State seems to be full of lightweight dummies. Durham & Barr must be overwhelmingly astounded at what they are finding out about The Spygate Coup Conspiracy !

---

As usual, you never know, but I suspect Ole Evelyn is probably quite book smart and VERY long on wisdom, which is likely to change in the next two years.

Like so many Leftys, she's probably a benighted follower who just doesn't commiserate with anyone outside of her Dem cogniscenti. All of the talking points are more than that, they're gospel.

---

I hope Durham makes some of these kind of people wet themselves during interrogations.

3 Toed Pete said:

---

I will post this point again because it will show the extent of the collusion by schiff and the dems to get Trump by any means necessary and what a sham impeachment it. The day after Trump's Ukraine phone call, schiff hired a NSC staffer, sean misko, who is very close friends and worked with ciaramella at the NSC.

Coincidence, right?

---

If witnesses are called somehow in the Senate, Misko and Ciaramella absolutely have to be two of them. Also, I'd love to see their phone/email (including personal) records subpoenaed as well.

Quote:

---

Despite Schiff's claim that neither he nor any member of his staff had any contact with the whistleblower prior to the date he filed his complaint, we later learned that the whistleblower had reached out to a member or members of Schiff's staff before submitting his document. He did not inform Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson that he had done so.

I'll give you three guesses who he contacted.

I'll refine the theory I wrote about in an earlier post now that we know Ciaramella and Misko were "bros." Lt. Col. Vindman leaked the readout to Ciaramella, who then reached out to his "bro" Sean Misko, Adam Schiff's new hire. Once Adam Schiff heard about it, he saw the opportunity it presented. And the rest is history.

---

Quote:

---

If he was he would charge it as a racketeering case.

---

I have no problem with Giulianni saying that, but you know he talks to Barr at least once a week. I'm SURE he's conveyed his own professional ideas as to how he would proceed.