Me too!!!MooreTrucker said:
I love this!!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1044384355391430656.html
Me too!!!MooreTrucker said:
I love this!!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1044384355391430656.html
Were you also trolled by 4chan?RoscoePColtrane said:
Nm
Bobcat06 said:
Why would you give a two day notice that you're gonna subpoena something? That just gives dems time to shred evidence. Just go ahead an subpoena it.
Archaic Senate RulesBobcat06 said:
Why would you give a two day notice that you're gonna subpoena something? That just gives dems time to shred evidence. Just go ahead an subpoena it.
Because the fat f*** Nadler is the ranking Dem who can kibosh it, IIRC.Bobcat06 said:
Why would you give a two day notice that you're gonna subpoena something? That just gives dems time to shred evidence. Just go ahead an subpoena it.
aggiehawg said:Because the fat f*** Nadler is the ranking Dem who can kibosh it, IIRC.Bobcat06 said:
Why would you give a two day notice that you're gonna subpoena something? That just gives dems time to shred evidence. Just go ahead an subpoena it.
Interesting email. I kept expecting to see a request for bank account information to transfer the 15 million US dollars.drcrinum said:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1044089864663101441.html
Scott Stedman is an investigative journalist. Sara Carter follows him on Twitter...he appears legit. This thread is about a 'cease & desist' email with very interesting details concerning Mifsud. Here is the email:
As you can read, Mifsud per the email was a admitted Western intelligence operative who reputedly was tasked with setting up a meeting (connecting) between Papadopoulos and a Russian person, and now this Western Intelligence Agency is keeping him quiet. Well, well.
The Russian person we know is obviously Ivan Timofeev. But who is the Western Intelligence Agency???
People are speculating with good reason that it is MI6. Wow! If this is true, are you now seeing how deeply involved the Brits were in the scheme? We're talking March 2016! No wonder the Brits don't want any details about Carter Page's FISA or the FBI original investigative directive released.
Quote:George Soros has indirectly funded Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm behind the infamous Steele dossier, a spokesman for the billionaire financier has acknowledged.
- A spokesman for left-wing billionaire financier George Soros is acknowledging that he indirectly funded Fusion GPS, the firm behind the Steele dossier
- Sources have told The Daily Caller News Foundation in the past that Soros helped fund Fusion's post-election work on Russian interference in the election process
- Soros' spokesman told The Washington Post that Soros donated to the Democracy Integrity Project, a group founded by a former staffer to Sen. Dianne Feinstein
Michael Vachon, the Soros aide, told Washington Post columnist David Ignatius that Soros provided a grant to a nonprofit group called the Democracy Integrity Project.
That organization, which was formed in 2017 by Daniel Jones, a former Senate Intelligence Committee staffer for Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, paid Fusion GPS as a contractor to continue an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The Post column confirms what a Washington, D.C., lawyer named Adam Waldman told The Daily Caller News Foundation about a conversation he had with Jones in March 2017.
Waldman was an attorney for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. He also worked in some capacity for Christopher Steele, according to text messages he exchanged with Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence panel.
In what the Post's Ignatius noted was an "incestuous" relationship, Steele, a former MI6 officer, has done work for the Kremlin-linked Deripaska in the past.
Waldman told TheDCNF that Jones approached him on March 15, 2017 through text message asking to meet....
Yeah that was wishful thinking, because that C&D letter pretty much kills the Russia claims and the claims of emails and dirt.aggiehawg said:
Mifsud is still alive? I thought lawyers for the DNC said he was believed to be dead?
aggiehawg said:
Mifsud is still alive? I thought lawyers for the DNC said he was believed to be dead?
Quote:
The response came from her boss, Michael Gottlieb. Here's our email exchange that evening:
Gottlieb: You have sent two emails today (one copied below) purporting to ask us questions regarding the lawsuit our client Aaron Rich filed against the Washington Times, Mr. Butowsky, Mr. Couch, and America First Media in the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:18-cv-00681-RJL. Do you currently represent any party in that action? If so, which party do you represent? Do you contend that you are authorized to continue acting on behalf of a party in this litigation notwithstanding that you are not admitted to practice in D.C. and you withdrew your motion to appear pro hac vice? Or perhaps you are now authorized to practice law in D.C. If that is the case, please let us know.
Clevenger: I still serve as Mr. Butowsky's personal attorney, and I am involved directly or indirectly in all of his cases. I'm not sure why any of that matters. The first question pertained to a case in NY, not DC. The other question, frankly, was for purposes of my blog. If you and your client were serious about getting answers, you wouldn't be dragging your feet and making excuses. Your bluff has been called, and I think you know it.
Gottlieb: Thank you for confirming in writing that you continue to practice law in D.C. without authorization to do so.
Clevenger: Yeah, go ahead and file that complaint against me. We've already established that you like to talk tough and then do nothing. By the way, coordinating my client's representation in multiple jurisdictions is not "practicing law" in DC. And when your client's case craters (like the related cases in NY did), I'll probably be handling the malicious prosecution claims against you and your firm.
Quote:
A U.S. House of Representatives committee voted on Friday to release dozens of transcripts of interviews from its investigation of Russia and the 2016 U.S. election, including conversations with senior associates of President Donald Trump.
The House Intelligence Committee voted unanimously to agree to send transcripts of the 53 interviews to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for review before they are made public, committee members said.
That would pave the way for the public to see thousands of pages of conversations with people including the president's eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and son-in-law and close adviser Jared Kushner, as well as Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon.
Interviews with officials from former President Barack Obama's administration, including former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power are also among the transcripts.