LOL! So Mueller! Has he produced a critical witness close to Trump that isn't a liar, a pedophile, an embezzler, a porn star, a madam, or BSC yet?
I doubt Mueller cares. He's go to hell to interview Satan if he thought it would get Trump.aggiehawg said:
LOL! So Mueller! Has he produced a critical witness close to Trump that isn't a liar, a pedophile, an embezzler, a porn star, a madam, or BSC yet?
The Democrats need her, and she won't go away. They're baiting Trump to arrest her because the media will turn her into a martyr and say it is proof that Trump is racist. They need to tank Trump's approval rating among blacks.RoscoePColtrane said:
I'm sorry anyone trying to claim Omarosa was an FBI CHS sounds like Alex Jones level BS.
And who is it that says Mueller is seriously considering her recordings has based on this?
Omarosa's 15 minutes will be up soon enough. Especially if the DOJ decides pursue the issues with her recording in a SCIF and possibly privileged conversations.
Rapier108 said:The Democrats need her, and she won't go away. They're baiting Trump to arrest her because the media will turn her into a martyr and say it is proof that Trump is racist. They need to tank Trump's approval rating among blacks.RoscoePColtrane said:
I'm sorry anyone trying to claim Omarosa was an FBI CHS sounds like Alex Jones level BS.
And who is it that says Mueller is seriously considering her recordings has based on this?
Omarosa's 15 minutes will be up soon enough. Especially if the DOJ decides pursue the issues with her recording in a SCIF and possibly privileged conversations.
Well they won't tank the AA approval with Omarosa. She has zero credibility with the conservative AA voters.Rapier108 said:The Democrats need her, and she won't go away. They're baiting Trump to arrest her because the media will turn her into a martyr and say it is proof that Trump is racist. They need to tank Trump's approval rating among blacks.RoscoePColtrane said:
I'm sorry anyone trying to claim Omarosa was an FBI CHS sounds like Alex Jones level BS.
And who is it that says Mueller is seriously considering her recordings has based on this?
Omarosa's 15 minutes will be up soon enough. Especially if the DOJ decides pursue the issues with her recording in a SCIF and possibly privileged conversations.
Cepe said:
Does this mean the next IC report is about to come out?
Cepe said:
Does this mean the next IC report is about to come out?
Reporting has been that it is in the review process as the first on, and has been for two weeks. The last one stayed in review for 39 days. Being this is a FISA abuse investigation as a focus point, these redactions and people tying it up could be more involved than the last one granted the level of classification around FISC and FISA.Cepe said:
Does this mean the next IC report is about to come out?
Without a doubtAgInTheColony said:
More evidence that the left loves to throw their money at criminals.
EKUAg said:
And this is part of why none of them thought what Hillary was doing was a big deal. Because the leadership at the FBI all seemed to be pulling down classified info into unclassified networks.
RoscoePColtrane said:
Judge Ellis is sealing today's proceedings. Media blackout
RoscoePColtrane said:
Judge Ellis is sealing today's proceedings. Media blackout
I've been wondering about this. Good judges usually have solid intuitions about how a jury is going to break. Perhaps he's going to tell them which verdicts will "likely" (wink this will happen) be directed and which counts he thinks the jury will tag Manafort for and then to work out a deal.BMX Bandit said:
My complete guess is he's going to browbeat both sides about a plea
Catherine Herridge indicated that the court official responsible for handling the jury was being specifically called to the courtroom before it was sealed today. Also note the same court official was summoned to one of the multiple bench conferences that happened on Friday. Might be coincidence, might not.blindey said:I've been wondering about this. Good judges usually have solid intuitions about how a jury is going to break. Perhaps he's going to tell them which verdicts will "likely" (wink this will happen) be directed and which counts he thinks the jury will tag Manafort for and then to work out a deal.BMX Bandit said:
My complete guess is he's going to browbeat both sides about a plea
But I don't do criminal work, so I have no idea.
I personally could GAF what Horowitz has to say, but I'm curious, but once it's out the indictments will be unsealed and then let the games begin.FbgTxAg said:
You guys actually think the IG report is gonna amount to anything? I'll save you some time and give you the headline in advance.
"While we found numerous instances of protocol being breached and policies and procedures not being followed, we have determined that neither political ideology nor personal animosity were involved. We have referred a few individuals who broke protocol to the OPM, and we believe it is appropriate to let that process play out."
FbgTxAg said:
You guys actually think the IG report is gonna amount to anything? I'll save you some time and give you the headline in advance.
"While we found numerous instances of protocol being breached and policies and procedures not being followed, we have determined that neither political ideology nor personal animosity were involved. We have referred a few individuals who broke protocol to the OPM, and we believe it is appropriate to let that process play out."