Uhmm, well we know Carter Page's civil rights were violated. Under a two hop system, no telling how many other American s' civil rights were also violated.Rockdoc said:
Victims? Please.
Rosey probably should be more worried about presenting false evidence to the FISC seriously.VegasAg86 said:
Now that we know for certain Rosenstein signed a FISA application on Carter Page, how is he not conflicted out of supervising the Mueller investigation? Seems far more conflicted than Sessions to me.
Back of the hands hurt a hell of a lot worse, especially with bamboo rod.RoscoePColtrane said:Never had a nun do it but I had a teacher that used a ruler on the back of the hand on a regular basis. bruises be damned. Spent my first 8 grades in a one room school house and Ms Bridges took no guff from anyone.aggiehawg said:BTW, nuns actually slapped palms, not the top of the hands. That would leave bruises. The palm would not but hurt just as much.RoscoePColtrane said:aggiehawg said:
"Aisle" dear, not "isle."
First Jive Dude: Shiiiiit, maaaaan. That honky muf' be messin' mah old lady... got to be runnin' cold upside down his head, you know?titan said:
On a more general note, foresaw next to no perp walks fairly early, at least of very high ranking schemers in this cabal against President Trump. With 80% redacted documents going around, any still think there will be alot of swampers and Democrats yet snared, or will Trump be lucky to avoid some drummed up crime charge no one cares about -- along the lines of Beria's `name the man, find the crime' kind of fake judicial system??
As have said before will settle for the Leftist-MSM clique being pushed even more out of power in the mid-terms, but pretty skeptical of anything else with so much wobblies on the Republican side. Why are stern AGs so hard to find?
That's seriously the talking point they're leading with? "These hyper-partisan hacks have to keep their clearances in case people they viscerally hate want advice on how to do their jobs"?RoscoePColtrane said:
This idiot
Like Obama called Condi Rice every week, sure, whatever. The real reason they are howling about maybe losing their SC is because they can no longer legally receive classified information through leaks from holdover staff. It is not illegal since they still have the highest clearance. Remove that and many of those staffers would reconsider leaking anything to them.blindey said:That's seriously the talking point they're leading with? "These hyper-partisan hacks have to keep their clearances in case people they viscerally hate want advice on how to do their jobs"?RoscoePColtrane said:
This idiot
I've been loathe to use the term "unhinged" but this narrative -- in addition to everything else we've seen -- is making me reconsider.
Not sure why it even matters to the left anyway. Ben Rhodes was Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor for EIGHT years with NO SECURITY CLEARANCE ever. Saw everything that went on in the Oval office. It's the only reason he's not on that list too, because he never had one to revoke.tsuag10 said:
Definitely a pretty weak talking point. If Swallowswell's comment has any substance to it, I would ask why these has-been experts can't just be read-in on a case-by-case basis if their help is needed.....?
That would make too much sense for govt. folk.
If that's true about Rhodes, someone like Hannity should blow the lid off of that. The MSM wet their pants worrying about Kushner's clearance status.RoscoePColtrane said:Not sure why it even matters to the left anyway. Ben Rhodes was Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor for EIGHT years with NO SECURITY CLEARANCE ever. Saw everything that went on in the Oval office. It's the only reason he's not on that list too, because he never had one to revoke.tsuag10 said:
Definitely a pretty weak talking point. If Swallowswell's comment has any substance to it, I would ask why these has-been experts can't just be read-in on a case-by-case basis if their help is needed.....?
That would make too much sense for govt. folk.
Let this soak in as Deputy National Security Advisor, Rhodes had legal authority to unmask U.S. citizens.
I honestly don't know how their "need to know" would be assessed and by whom in regards to access.fasthorses05 said:
Hawg, Roscoe, couldn't they (Clapper, Brennan, etc.) just go to a computer in a government building that allows all top secret information to be reviewed. I understand it's easier to get it from true believers at the NSA, CIA, etc., but I'm also sure there are plenty of computers in DC that allow that information to be seen.
How did we find out about Hillary's complete lack of security on her computers? Does anyone know how incredibly long that had been going on, or does Bill still have top level access? I know Hillary did from her days at State, but I don't know if it was SCIF. IF she didn't, then I'm sure she piggy backed off Bill's clearance.
In a nutshell, no they can't just walk in and log on.fasthorses05 said:
Hawg, Roscoe, couldn't they (Clapper, Brennan, etc.) just go to a computer in a government building that allows all top secret information to be reviewed. I understand it's easier to get it from true believers at the NSA, CIA, etc., but I'm also sure there are plenty of computers in DC that allow that information to be seen.
How did we find out about Hillary's complete lack of security on her computers? Does anyone know how incredibly long that had been going on, or does Bill still have top level access? I know Hillary did from her days at State, but I don't know if it was SCIF. IF she didn't, then I'm sure she piggy backed off Bill's clearance.
Him not having clearance is absolutely true and well known.tsuag10 said:If that's true about Rhodes, someone like Hannity should blow the lid off of that. The MSM wet their pants worrying about Kushner's clearance status.RoscoePColtrane said:Not sure why it even matters to the left anyway. Ben Rhodes was Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor for EIGHT years with NO SECURITY CLEARANCE ever. Saw everything that went on in the Oval office. It's the only reason he's not on that list too, because he never had one to revoke.tsuag10 said:
Definitely a pretty weak talking point. If Swallowswell's comment has any substance to it, I would ask why these has-been experts can't just be read-in on a case-by-case basis if their help is needed.....?
That would make too much sense for govt. folk.
Let this soak in as Deputy National Security Advisor, Rhodes had legal authority to unmask U.S. citizens.
Wasn't Rhodes one of the "masterminds" behind the Iran deal?