Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,737,555 Views | 49411 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by nortex97
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:


Well, maybe this day won't be a total bust. Not that we'll hear anything but at least he's talking.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe Adam Schiff can commit hari kari there on the floor.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Maybe Adam Schiff can commit hari kari there on the floor.
If he hasn't leaked anything yet, it's bad news for the dems.
🤡 🤡 🤡
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope they try to whitewash Imran Awan and try to redact the OIG report which everyone has been anticipating for MONTHS...

The blue trickle will become a red tsunami, IMO.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:

backintexas2013 said:

So is he rolling on people
Nope they are hiding the truth of all he actually did, they are trying to make this gigantic breach of national security that Debbie Wassermann Schultz tried to cover up, and threatened LEO's and covered the tracks of the perps for a year maybe more. This is an absolute white wash to get this case off the docket and under the rug. It's being avoided by the MSM like radioactive sludge
To me, this is the most confusing case, investigation, situation, that's currently out there. I have NO doubt you're absoluetly correct. I guess it's because I didn't follow it as closely as the other "15" political investigations! However, it sounds like we're going to have a trial involving highly classified material, and the public can't EVER see it, hear about the results, or who was involved.

Roscoe, blindey, Hawg, I understand there's a need for the type of legal tarp being thrown on a case like this. There's got to be a way to follow, or get information, as to the uncovered facts, etc..

Oh, one additional edit, based on recent history, it's certain a Dem would leak sealed information to the public, and of course, it would be okay with everyone.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Maybe Adam Schiff can commit hari kari there on the floor.
If he hasn't leaked anything yet, it's bad news for the dems.
Yep. They've had plenty of potty breaks. That's when he does it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Roscoe, blindey, Hawg, I understand there's a need for the type of legal tarp being thrown on a case like this. There's got to be a way to follow, or get information, as to the uncovered facts, etc..
FOIA after the case is over, if the House or Senate don't investigate it. Horowitz could also take a looksee to find out what is truly going on.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gracias.

I was afraid that might be the best alternative.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Initially wasn't the prosecutor DWS brother or something along those lines?
Staff - take out the trash.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Adam Ag 98 said:

Initially wasn't the prosecutor DWS brother or something along those lines?
He works there but wasn't assigned the case. Doesn't mean he hasn't been able to infiltrate it and affect it, however.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So now Felix Sater is reemerging as a figure in the Mueller investigation? (Just heard on Brett Bair.)

THIS guy? (from Wiki)

Quote:

Felix Sater has been described as a career criminal due to his links to organized crime.

In 1991, Sater got into an argument with a commodities broker at the El Rio Grande restaurant and bar in Midtown Manhattan. He stabbed the man's cheek and neck with the stem of a margarita glass, breaking his jaw, lacerating his face, and severing nerves, creating a wound that would require 110 stitches to treat. Sater was convicted of first degree assault and spent 15 months in Edgecombe Correctional Facility before being paroled.

In 1998, Sater was convicted of fraud in connection to a $40 million penny stock pump and dump scheme conducted by the Russian Mafia involving his company White Rock Partners. In return for a guilty plea, Sater agreed to assist the FBI and federal prosecutors as an informant in organized crime. In 2009, he was sentenced to pay a $25,000 fine and served no prison time.

As a result of his assistance, Sater's court records were sealed for 10 years by Loretta Lynch, then the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Lynch's decision to seal his records was discussed at her 2015 Congressional confirmation hearings to become attorney general; she stated that Sater provided "information crucial to national security and the conviction of over 20 individuals, including those responsible for committing massive financial fraud and members of La Cosa Nostra."

Articles about Russia's potential interference with the 2016 election of Donald Trump report that Felix Sater played a role in trying to assist Russia. According to the New York Times and other sources, Felix Sater wrote and sent to his Russian contact(s) (probably Dmitry Peskov, Putin's personal assistant) an email stating, "I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected" and "If he says it we own this election."

In July 2017, The Financial Times, citing five sources with knowledge of the matter, reported that Sater had agreed to cooperate with investigators looking into an international money laundering scheme involving Viktor Khrapunov, a former government minister in Kazakhstan. Khrapunov, who now lives in Switzerland, has been accused by the Kazakhstani government of embezzling millions of dollars and is wanted by Interpol.

Sater received multiple subpoenas to produce documents and be deposed in the case against Mukhtar Ablyazov who is alleged to have defrauded BTA Bank of up to $5 billion as chairman. Ablyazov's alleged fraud is the biggest case of financial fraud in history.
Nice witness you have there, Bobby. No credibility issues with that guy, nosirree.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:




Now the pain begins!
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would he want immunity? We have heard he did nothing wrong
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Immunity for testifying before a committee that can't do anything with respect to criminal action for your treason against America?

F that.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:


Uhmm, that's an, "Oh crap!" But for the people who would like to see McCabe pay for his crimes.

Oliver North problem. He was granted limited immunity for his testimony before Congress but then his convictions were later thrown out on appeal for using his immunized testimony.

This is a tread lightly moment when crafting that immunity, if prosecution for his crimes is an ultimate goal here. Chances are his crimes have been already thoroughly documented without his immunized testimony but still treacherous waters......

RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

RoscoePColtrane said:


Uhmm, that's an, "Oh crap!" But for the people who would like to see McCabe pay for his crimes.

Oliver North problem. He was granted limited immunity for his testimony before Congress but then his convictions were later thrown out on appeal for using his immunized testimony.

This is a tread lightly moment when crafting that immunity, if prosecution for his crimes is an ultimate goal here. Chances are his crimes have been already thoroughly documented without his immunized testimony but still treacherous waters......


NO IMMUNITY. Military tribunals now.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am shocked that some of our resident thread starters who are leftists haven't started one on this yet. Wonder why.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

I am shocked that some of our resident thread starters who are leftists haven't started one on this yet. Wonder why.
Too busy making fun of Trump for not knowing the words to God Bless America.
Whens lunch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I could see telling him...

Hey we've got people talking left and right. We already have you completely covered.

I can't imagine you can give us anything we don't already know, but maybe we can make a deal if you have something good enough to take a few years off.

Hell, you might get out and see your kids again before you die.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

I am shocked that some of our resident thread starters who are leftists haven't started one on this yet. Wonder why.

They're waiting for the mother ship to transmit the spin instructions.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No deals

Q
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:




Go on...
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSN and Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Schiff, Swallowswell etc etc told us for a month that the POTUS has put us in a constitutional crisis when he fired this POS, and what a dedicated public servant he's been for 20 years, now this same POS want immunity in return for his testimony.

Screw you McCabe, plead the 5th all you want and rot in prison for about 10-20 years. Jim Comey will likely be your cellmate.


Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

I am shocked that some of our resident thread starters who are leftists haven't started one on this yet.
They go underground just like blowhard sips on college football Sundays.
Paradise Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

backintexas2013 said:

I am shocked that some of our resident thread starters who are leftists haven't started one on this yet. Wonder why.
Too busy making fun of Trump for not knowing the words to God Bless America.

Actually for not singing the words. It's a pretty solid bet Trump knows them and just isn't enamored with his own voice.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't libs tell us if you invoke the fifth, you're guilty?

Well, anyone still want to defend McCabe?
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:


wudt?
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Outside counsel, OK
White house staff, OK

The President? Who the **** do these people think they are?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.scribd.com/document/381103669/Bromwich-Letter-to-Chuck-Grassley-RE-McCabe

Quote:

...The May 30 Letter invited Mr. McCabe to testify at a hearing entitled, Examining the Inspector General's First Report on Justice Department Decisions Regarding the 2016 Presidential Election. In an exchange of emails with your staff on May 31, I pointed out that Mr. McCabe was not one of the key decision makers during the events described in the forthcoming Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report that will be the focus of the hearing, as reflected in the draft OIG report we recently reviewed....


Hmmm... This must have something to do with McCabe's immunity request. (Roscoe can print the entire letter; it's beyond my capabilities.)
First Page Last Page
Page 441 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.