coyote68 said:

---

Forgive my stupidity. What is the January 17 letter?

---

The date Horowitz announced his Hillary investigation?

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

But related to this...what ever happened to all of the unmasking requests? At one time a few months ago there was info leaking out about hundreds of these requests from Obamaites and that Samantha Power (or someone using her access) had made a metric crap-ton of these requests. Anyone have any updates? I also thought there is a scandal/crime in that...bigly.

---

That subject would be within the purview of Inspector Generals for the CIA, NSA and DNI. Not Horowitz.

That is not to say those Inspector Generals wouldn't be conducting their own investigations and communicating with Horowitz on their findings, however.

---

I have wondered about this aspect often. How likely is it that these other Inspector Generals are conducting their own investigations at the same time or in conjunction with the Horowitz review/investigation of the FBI/DOJ? So much of this bleeds into other Departments and lines of responsibility and authority.

I hope I am pleasantly surprised and these other IG's have it going on and they have been very very good at keeping it a secret, ie. no leaks!

drcrinum said:

---

fasthorses05 said:

---

Here's the way I look at this, has IRex been accurate in the past?

If so, then he knows his stuff.

Anyone who reads my post, knows about 8-10% of the time, I get get overwhelmed with the cynics disease, but otherwise, I expect many elected officials I'm familiar with to do their job. We'll see, but to my knowledge, Rex is still connected, and hasn't been wrong, so it's full steam ahead.

Not all Republicans are limp-wristed "feckless c****" (call out to S. BEE)!

---

Go to Page 64 and look at the stats. I can't copy & paste it, but the info and footnotes are encouraging regarding number of indictments:
https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1805.pdf

---

Quote:

---

I have wondered about this aspect often. How likely is it that these other Inspector Generals are conducting their own investigations at the same time or in conjunction with the Horowitz review/investigation of the FBI/DOJ? So much of this bleeds into other Departments and lines of responsibility and authority.

I hope I am pleasantly surprised and these other IG's have it going on and they have been very very good at keeping it a secret, ie. no leaks!

---

The name of it escapes me at the moment but there is a committee that oversees and coordinates various intertwined investigations between agencies. But I do know that currently the head of that committee is actually Horowitz, himself.

So that's nice.

Thank you! You always come through.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

What was the story Solomon teased?

---

---

aggiehawg said:

---

coyote68 said:

---

Forgive my stupidity. What is the January 17 letter?

---

The date Horowitz announced his Hillary investigation?

---

Thank you!

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

What was the story Solomon teased?

---

---

---

I hate to say it, but IMO there is nothing new in this article if you have kept up with our thread.

Popcorn gif

Long but; 6 10-15 minute videos recapping the FBI "matter" and the DOJ & FBI Involvement and Testimony behind the OIG upcoming report:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/31/details-behind-upcoming-ig-report-the-fbi-and-doj-handling-of-clinton-investigation-six-part-video-report/

Video 1 of 6


Video 2 of 6:


Video 3 of 6:


Video 4 of 6:


Video 5 of 6:


Video 6 of 6:

I don't know if this has come up in this thread but I wonder how much of all of this Russia Russia Russia business and it's origins is tied into the Brexit Referendum (June 23, 2016), The Globalists, Paris Accord, etc.?

With it becoming more clear than ever that the Brits, Aussies, Obama foreign electioneering (Brexit) ... just seems strongly possible and common sensical that there is a connection.

$.02 cents comment by me.

ccatag said:

---

I don't know if this has come up in this thread but I wonder how much of all of this Russia Russia Russia business and it's origins is tied into the Brexit Referendum (June 23, 2016), The Globalists, Paris Accord, etc.?

With it becoming more clear than ever that the Brits, Aussies, Obama foreign electioneering (Brexit) ... just seems strongly possible and common sensical that there is a connection.

$.02 cents comment by me.

---

Pretty sure it hasn't come up in this thread. It would serve as good motivation for the Brit globalists, for sure. Of course, I'm much more interested in seeing American actors severely punished.

Maybe someone who is a bit better at understanding the whole unmasking process, what happens to that data when the conversation is unmasked?

We know that the NSA is collecting large amounts of data, both knowingly and "not-wittingly". So someone asks for the unmasking of a certain correspondence. Is that piece of data removed, unmasked and sent to the person or is it unmasked and then stored at another destination for tracking?

I don't know why this question struck me as it did when we mentioned Powers recently. If it is the first scenario above, maybe the unmasking process is being used to cover up and "erase" conversations of these actors with their counterparts across the globe.

I have a feeling I am way off base and am probably looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. I just think that with the trouble to document these unmasking that Adm. Rogers put a stop to, this could be a possible reason for someone like Powers to be unmasking in the first place.

Conspiracy done. Thanks for playing.

Quote:

---

Donald J Trump is fixing to lock some muthaf***ers up. He will face these head winds head on, and weather the storm to save the ship. That's what leaders do.

---

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/tgp-exclusive-former-intelligence-officers-find-indisputable-evidence-u-s-intel-leaders-were-linked-to-british-in-spygate-scandal/

Quote:

---

TGP EXCLUSIVE: Former Intelligence Officers Find 'Indisputable Evidence' U.S. Intel Leaders Were Linked to British in Spygate Scandal

The Gateway Pundit investigative journalist Cassandra Fairbanks interviewed three former intelligence officers with knowledge of the corrupt -- criminal activity of the Obama CIA.

The former officers told The Gateway Pundit:

• The U.K.'s Joint Intelligence Committee was the venue used by the CIA and the DNI to share and receive "intelligence" allegedly linking Trump to Russia.
• The sources believe that John Brennan and James Clapper used highly classified intelligence channels to create a trail of fake evidence linking Trump to Russia.
• George Papadopoulos was targeted deliberately by U.K. intel operatives in a plot to trick him.
• It was Joseph Mifsud, not Papadopoulos, who raised the prospect of meeting with the Russians and introduced the claim that Russia had damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
• Joeseph Mifsud was a British operative, not a Russian asset.
• The only entity that could have coordinated the entire operation was the Obama White House.

Multiple former intelligence officers believe there is indisputable evidence that British Intelligence organizations -- GCHQ and MI6 in particular -- collaborated with the U.S. intelligence community to portray Donald Trump and his associates as pawns of the Russians....

---

Interesting article. If you read it, you will learn that Gina Haspel, the new CIA Director, was in the UK during 2016 as CIA Station Chief, & she may have been privileged to some of the intel flow from the UK to Brennan.

The next question: assuming she is involved, why make her chief while all of this is coming out?

OneNightW said:

---

The next question: assuming she is involved, why make her chief while all of this is coming out?

---

I don't think she is complicit. If she was station chief and complicit, Brennan himself would have had no reason to risk exposure by going over there himself. It would have been tasked to the station chief and couriered back and forth through the state department secure attache pouch route. Brennan kept the group down to an absolute minimum. More people involved the more chance of leaks or mistakes.

OneNightW said:

---

The next question: assuming she is involved, why make her chief while all of this is coming out?

---

Not that she was involved, but she would have been exposed to intel discussed by the UK's Joint Intelligence Committee and passed that on to Brennan. She would know what the UK intel services were feeding Brennan except for when Brennan met personally with Hannigan. I would assume that Flynn & his pals cleared her before Pompeo ever became head of the CIA, & Pompeo worked with her until his new assignment. She was appointed Deputy Director on February 2, 2017, and Nunes gave her a big recommendation at that time per her association with the HPSCI.
If you google her name, you will come up with enormous amounts of contemptuous drivel from the Left, supposedly related to waterboarding, but in retrospect, it may be orchestrated 'resistance' because she likely knows some details about Brennan's role in the plot.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-real-reason-why-the-fbi-had-a-spy-in-the-trump-campaign/

Quote:

---

The Real Reason Why the FBI Had a Spy in the Trump Campaign

---

Fairly long & detailed read, but very convincing. Recommended.

This woman is 100% BSC.... She's a disgrace to anyone holding a JD

POTUS tweeted out the jobs numbers 15 minutes ahead of the official announcement

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

This woman is 100% BSC.... She's a disgrace to anyone holding a JD

POTUS tweeted out the jobs numbers 15 minutes ahead of the official announcement

---

"Conservative blogger at @WashingtonPost's Right Turn, MSNBC contributor, recovering lawyer and friend of Israel"
lol.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

This woman is 100% BSC.... She's a disgrace to anyone holding a JD

POTUS tweeted out the jobs numbers 15 minutes ahead of the official announcement

---

Mueller will probably do it too.

Maybe she's been squawking the whole time behind closed doors, that as soon as she realized what information was being passed she threw up red flags. Integrity and loyalty (to the law) like that would warrant promotion.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1002596549346590721.html

If you think it's an accident that the FBI releases 458 pages of the Clinton server investigation today late on Friday, you aren't paying attention. These are likely directly addressed in the OIG report and safe to see the light of day now, the report is finished and in distribution, popcorn ready

Just curious how they address the obvious interface in the email investigation and the FSA abuses because there is definite interface and overlap.

So you think that's a highly redacted preemptive effort by the FBI to counter the OIG report? And that Wray authorized that? I don't like the redactions. That is not productive in transparency.

It is noteworthy it happened but can't help but wonder about the rationale for doing it.

drcrinum said:

---

This is the Left,,,so evil.

---

Need a conservative platform.