drcrinum said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I take a lot of what this guy puts out with a grain of salt, but in 10 years he's never published phony documents that anyone can prove otherwise, but he made this thread two months ago.


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/976943588394323973.html

---

You scooped me again. There are some interesting details in Assange's tweetthread. He makes it sound like the UK government might have had a direct hand in the scheming....and perhaps they did. If Hannigan was communicating directly with & visiting with Brennan, you know the UK government heads had to be appraised of what was going on. And it's very interesting that it wasn't long after this tweetthread that Assange was isolated electronically. Coincidence? Hah! The UK restricts certain civil liberties that we enjoy in the US.

If you think about it, there were high ranking UK officials who despised Trump because of Brexit and his relationship with Nigel Farage, the latter endorsing Trump in May 2016 and attending the Republican Convention. We now know there were a host of Brits involved in the scheme, including influential intel people like Richard Dearlove & Robert Hannigan, not to mention Ambassador Downer, and there was that sudden, unexpected resignation of Hannigan several days after Trump's inauguration. And since Trump's inauguration, Theresa May has always been very 'cool' regarding her relationship with Trump. I'm suspicious there is more to the story.

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Good work by Mueller

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Fido04 said:

---

Quote:

---

Mueller's perp walk

---

You are getting a bit carried away.

---

Judge Sullivan's Brady Orders carry a criminal contempt warning. That means arrest. And the fact that Mueller never signed any of the official letters, pleadings, nor anything else coming out of his office does not give him a get-out-jail-free card. All pleadings were filed under his name, even if he didn't sign them.

So if the second FBI Special Agent says the 302s were altered, Mueller knew that. Peter Strzok, the guy who altered them was on his team. Then Mueller removed him in August, 2017. The Flynn plea deal on an information, not a grand jury indictment occurred months later.

Mueller knew he didn't have enough to get a grand jury to indict Flynn. So he by-passed that by charging Flynn himself. Just to try to get Flynn to turn on Trump.

And you know what? Those Machiavellian tactics might have worked, except he chose the wrong guys to exert pressure on...Flynn who was completely innocent and Manafort, who fights fire with fire.

---

OneNightW said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Good work by Mueller

---

---

AMF 2 AMC said:

---

Sally Yates cut herself off at the knees in paragraph 2?

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Was the poster trying to hijack again?

---

Quote:

---

October 20 2016, Rogers was briefed by the NSA compliance officer on findings from the 702 NSA compliance audit. The audit had uncovered numerous query violations. October 21, 2016, Rogers shut down all 704/705b query activity, not just contractors but everybody, and reported his findings to the DOJ head, Loretta Lynch.

Is it just a coincidence that on October 21 2016, the DOJ/FBI seek and receive a title 1 FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court? Hell no it wasn't because the FISA Court wasn't aware of the 702 query violations going on because Rogers didn't brief them until October 24 2016. So that morning on the 21st Rogers informs Lynch that he knows they are violating the 702 protocols and that afternoon they push through the title 1 warrant on Page. So the warrant on Page was already in place, when Rogers verbally briefed the FISC of the issues with the DOJ and their 702 abuses on October 24 2016. On October 26, 2016, Rogers appeared formally before the FISA Court and presented the findings of his audit.

on October 28 2016 Clapper submitted a recommendation that Director Rogers be removed as NSA Head, which failed because the last thing they want to do is fire a guy that has access to every dirty secret in the government, so Clapper was told to piss off. But like everything in the government the audit results that Rogers submitted to the FISC were not signed off on the 2016 Section 702 Certification non compliances until April 26, 2017, and it wasn't much more than a slap on the wrist, with the new administration in place of the actual violators.

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

Quote:

---

As I noted in An American Hero & the Death of a FISA Narrative:
It's unclear if [NSA Head] Rogers discovered the 702 violations and reported them in 2015, or if it was the Inspector General who found them. Either way, Rogers became aware of Section 702 violations sometime in 2015. Following the IG's report, Rogers implemented a tightening of internal rules at the NSA.
The IG's report and Roger's tightening of internal rules did not halt the Query Compliance Problems.

---

Quote:

---

Is it just a coincidence that on October 21 2016, the DOJ/FBI seek and receive a title 1 FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court? Hell no it wasn't because the FISA Court wasn't aware of the 702 query violations going on because Rogers didn't brief them until October 24 2016. So that morning on the 21st Rogers informs Lynch that he knows they are violating the 702 protocols and that afternoon they push through the title 1 warrant on Page. So the warrant on Page was already in place, when Rogers verbally briefed the FISC of the issues with the DOJ and their 702 abuses on October 24 2016. On October 26, 2016, Rogers appeared formally before the FISA Court and presented the findings of his audit.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Is it just a coincidence that on October 21 2016, the DOJ/FBI seek and receive a title 1 FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court? Hell no it wasn't because the FISA Court wasn't aware of the 702 query violations going on because Rogers didn't brief them until October 24 2016. So that morning on the 21st Rogers informs Lynch that he knows they are violating the 702 protocols and that afternoon they push through the title 1 warrant on Page. So the warrant on Page was already in place, when Rogers verbally briefed the FISC of the issues with the DOJ and their 702 abuses on October 24 2016. On October 26, 2016, Rogers appeared formally before the FISA Court and presented the findings of his audit.

---

FISA warrant applications are very long 50+ pages. Those cannot be drafted in a short time frame. So it was already prepared and ready to go by October 21, 2016. When was the Strzok/Page text about the "insurance policy"? August 2016?

Could preparing Title I FISA warrant applications have been discussed as a part of the "insurance policy"?? If so, how many others were prepared?

---

Quote:

---

Not to forget they had already been turned down on the title 1 on Page a couple of times before, so I'm sure they were already working on it. the October 21st try they added the dossier and it went through. But when Rogers let Lynch know that he knew what was happening, she knew he would be addressing the FISC soon. The 21st was a Friday and he Addressed the Court about his findings Monday the 24th. Their backs were against the wall and had to react then.

---

MEENAGGIE09 said:

---

Geez...

Just catching up from being away over the weekend.

The further this goes, the more anger and disgust builds.

It is astounding the level of corruption. There needs to be a long and very painful reckoning for everyone involved so that we can make sure it never happens again.

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Looks like a globalist cabal of various interests with American allies in the Obama administration and Clinton campaign was invested in ensuring a Clinton victory, then furious that Trump improbably defeated her anyhow and became desperate to cover their tracks once they realized the full implications of a potentially rightfully vengeful Trump with the powers of president.

---