Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,488,122 Views | 49269 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by aggiehawg
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:


I'm sure the left is giddy hoping they caught something juicy while completely ignoring the constitutional violations.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Mueller tapped the phone, Rod Rosenstein had to approve that first off. When he got what evidense he had turned it over to Rosenstein and Rosenstein sent it up to SDNY.

Wow.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right on cue

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From a Q perspective:

Trump could put a ton of "info" directly into the justice department and Mueller by having them listen to the call. This whole thing is outrageous.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Avenatti is bragging on MSNBC that he has knowledge that the Feds have texts as well on Cohen.

So likely they did a full Title 3 data mine and got everything

Mueller never leaks..,


Seems like a lot for a suspected FEC violation
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It's not appropriate. I mean, he's a lawyer. You mean, I call up my lawyer and the government is wiretapping him? That's pretty damn I mean, they've already eviscerated the attorney-client privilege. This would make a mockery of it." Rudy to WaPo
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:

Right on cue


Like the left gives a **** as to the rule of law.

This reeks of Mueller trying for a hail mary in order to find something to get Trump on.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The swamp has no bottom.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me guess, because Mueller was looking into a misdemeanor FEC violation he got Rosenstein to go along with a wiretap on a Licensed Attorney, a full blown title 3 warrant, and were able to bypass Sessions because it involved a possible Campaign violation, and Sessions has recused himself from everything except immigration, MS13 and marijuana.

And for a misdemeanor they wire tapped and kicked doors?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This really was an attempt to subvert the duly elected president. Closest thing to treason we may have had outside the civil war itself.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

Right on cue


Like the left gives a **** as to the rule of law.

This reeks of Mueller trying for a hail mary in order to find something to get Trump on.
Exactly. The FISA court has some pretty stringent rules, too. That didn't stop them from submitting unverified opposition research to obtain one.
🤡 🤡 🤡
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh really, Preet? How about a presidential campaign? Do you wiretap those "lightly"?

These people think we're idiots. Unfortunately, they're right.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OIG Report...I want it:
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know what you call this logical fallacy but the idea that wiretaps/no-knock warrants/whatever are hard to get, we got one, therefore Trump must be guilty of something is getting old.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSNBC is now back tracking the wire tap story
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait what?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
backintexas2013 said:

Wait what?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So just checking on who he is calling?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
backintexas2013 said:

So just checking on who he is calling?
Honestly by the morning they will back track the entire thing, this is their slow roll back to maintain their news cycle narrative.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Idiots

The have a DNR on Cohen....whoopie they have one on everyone with a telephone too

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:




Looks like someone realized that admitting potential violations of atty-client privilege and executive privilege might be a bad idea.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they backtrack is because of a legal issue or narrative screwup. It certainly isn't for accuracy.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

RoscoePColtrane said:




Looks like someone realized that admitting potential violations of atty-client privilege and executive privilege might be a bad idea.
Too late. The reporters should be questioned on who their sources are for that report and be put in jail if they refuse to answer. That's a very high level leak. Certainly on par if not beyond the Valerie Plame nonsense.

An "Ooops!" is not acceptable.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This Mueller witch hunt is like watching monkeys ***king footballs.

Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OneNightW said:

This Mueller witch hunt is like watching monkeys ***king footballs.


By the time I wrote this (within 30 seconds), the correction went from "monitoring" phone calls to a "pen-register".

LOL
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's my problem with how this has unfolded. Too many lies from the government.

  • SDNY was acting on a referral from Mueller.
  • Wait, no SDNY was already investigating Cohen, referral was extra
  • But Rosenstein is the one signing off on the raid on an attorney's office instead of Sessions, despite Mueller's story being that the referral was out of his purview on the Russia investigation
  • After the multiple raids and Cohen brings up attorney-client privilege the government justifies their actions by claiming he conducts virtually no legal business because they have been reading his various email accounts. There was already a search warrant granted for that.
  • Cohen was specifically named in the Steele Dossier, just like Carter Page but no Title I FISA warrant for him?
  • Now the story he was wiretapped (meaning a Title I FISA warrant, most likely) and then walked back several hours later. He's just under "regular surveillance."
  • Rosenstein refuses to tell Congress, who has oversight authority, how far he has expanded Mueller's jurisdiction.


Does anyone believe this is on the up-and-up?
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You would be surprised at how many do.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I want to actually believe the hair on my neck is they have been two hopping Cohen off of the Page title 1 and just never stopped. They never would have to justify it unless they were going to use it in a court proceedings. But someone spoke out of turn. I'm betting Whoever told what to whom gay some serious backlash so the crawfished the story and I'm betting they back it up even more before it's done. This smells of Michael Avenatti
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point, Chief Justice Roberts should feel compelled to fire every existing DC area FISC judge and name new ones. They are irretrievably compromised.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

OIG Report...I want it:

Patience. The longer it takes to come out, the worse for the Dems in November.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BINGO

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
First Page Last Page
Page 320 of 1408
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.