Close. It was Strozk that reopened the Hillary investigation days before election.backintexas2013 said:
Guessing the news will be Pete the Cheat is being set up.
"familiar" like, biblically familiar?reb, said:
CNN claiming that Strzok had a major role in re-opening the Clinton Email campaign 10 days before the election. Strzok wrote first draft of letter that Comey sent to congress re-opening it.
Source familiar says Strzok was "supportive" of re-opening it.
Think he is more along the lines of LastRefuge/Thomas Paine. He has "sources"aggiehawg said:
Who is NavyJack?? Is he like a Q or Mega type person?? (Without the stupid code crap?)
Question? Why was the number 2 in Co-Intel Comey's stenographer??reb, said:
CNN claiming that Strzok had a major role in re-opening the Clinton Email campaign 10 days before the election. Strzok wrote first draft of letter that Comey sent to congress re-opening it.
Source familiar says Strzok was "supportive" of re-opening it.
Thanks, That is kind of what I thought when I would see his posts put up on the huge thread on tigerdroppings.GCP12 said:Think he is more along the lines of LastRefuge/Thomas Paine. He has "sources"aggiehawg said:
Who is NavyJack?? Is he like a Q or Mega type person?? (Without the stupid code crap?)
FWIW, both the two I named believe NavyJack is a Black hat just putting out disinformation.
BTW, the two CNN reporters reporting this were Manu Raju and Valerie Jarrett's daughter...reb, said:
CNN claiming that Strzok had a major role in re-opening the Clinton Email campaign 10 days before the election. Strzok wrote first draft of letter that Comey sent to congress re-opening it.
Source familiar says Strzok was "supportive" of re-opening it.
Here's my theory. Wyden (and Rand Paul) have done MORE than anyone else to try and rein in FISA abuse. The two of them have been excellent at trying to protect our 4th amendment rights. Their efforts go all the way back to the Snowden revelations.aggiehawg said:Sounds like FISA abuse was not the best hill to choose to die on??GCP12 said:WTF is going onreb, said:
Senator Wyden sees Graham, raises. Who the HELL saw that coming.
Makes some sense, I guess. I don't want FISA killed completely. Really need to tighten up the procedure, though.Quote:
Here's my theory. Wyden (and Rand Paul) have done MORE than anyone else to try and rein in FISA abuse. The two of them have been excellent at trying to protect our 4th amendment rights. Their efforts go all the way back to the Snowden revelations.
Perhaps Wyden senses now is the moment to try and kill FISA for good.
Thomas Paine said that very same thing that NJ is a source of disinformation, he will post along with things that are already out that are virtually irrelevant but when something hot comes along he goes the other direction every time. Gritz thinks he's Clinton rapid response teamGCP12 said:Think he is more along the lines of LastRefuge/Thomas Paine. He has "sources"aggiehawg said:
Who is NavyJack?? Is he like a Q or Mega type person?? (Without the stupid code crap?)
FWIW, both the two I named believe NavyJack is a Black hat just putting out disinformation.
<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/23ps68"><img src="" title="made at imgflip.com"/></a>GCP12 said:WTF is going onreb, said:
Senator Wyden sees Graham, raises. Who the HELL saw that coming.
Yup, Wyden is a Dem, but I like what he says on civil liberties. I'm open to some Dems joining the burn it down partyreb, said:Here's my theory. Wyden (and Rand Paul) have done MORE than anyone else to try and rein in FISA abuse. The two of them have been excellent at trying to protect our 4th amendment rights. Their efforts go all the way back to the Snowden revelations.aggiehawg said:Sounds like FISA abuse was not the best hill to choose to die on??GCP12 said:WTF is going onreb, said:
Senator Wyden sees Graham, raises. Who the HELL saw that coming.
Perhaps Wyden senses now is the moment to try and kill FISA for good.
Nothing, but the media is determined to take out all who oppose the Deep State, with Trump being the #1 target.4stringAg said:
So what's the problem with Trump asking his appointments and other bureaucrats under him if they have his back?
And didn't 3 of those people testify under oath that never happened (except Comey, he waffled)???Ag with kids said:GCP12 said:
Should he ask them if they plan on going behind his back and undermining his policies?
aggiehawg said:You mean when he puts his hands palms down on the table?Quote:
Comey also has a tell with his hands. At first I thought it was a tick but it's not fully involuntary. I look at it as he's steadying himself when he stumbles.