fasthorses05 said:

---

reb, said:

---

whatt and who is he supposed to be observing or hearing about there?

---

reb, NO one knows about it, yet! Around the office, etc., it's not discussed for a variety of reasons, but mainly political discussions are more along the lines of "****hole" etc.

IF the facts are what I believe them to be, based on the actions of the Dems for the last 12 years, it will eventually make it's way to the great unwashed. It's highly likely that won't be until Sept-Dec of '18, if not July-Sept of '19. The reason the Dems are stalling everything is the '18 election. The give exactly 2 ****s about a potential coup, and coalescence of power, They'll ****can the results!

If not, the American public will find out, but it won't "crush" the Dem party like a previous message said. Like t-sips, they'll be back. They'll have a fabulous spin campaign on the OIG report, and try to crush Horowitz and his family, along with every conservative PR OFFICIAL alive. Look at the leftys on this thread, most are certain none of their minions did ANYTING wrong, we're evil (as usual), and they wear the white hat. Whatever Media Matters says, they believe, facts be damned.

So, it will take a while, and the Spring won't be soon enough. Expect Summer, at the earliest, for any kind of American citizen "enlightenment".

---

Arrests and charges do get people's attention. And Public open testimony. Once Rodgers is retired put him on the stand and let him sing.

GCP12 said:

---

When is Trump scheduled to sign the FISA extension?

What if he plans on vetoing it while simultaneously releasing this memo to show the abuse?

Ok, maybe this should be posted in the Q thread...

---

No, it shouldn't. Hope he doesn't sign as it is now. The roll out is helping that.

GCP12 said:

---

When is Trump scheduled to sign the FISA extension?

What if he plans on vetoing it while simultaneously releasing this memo to show the abuse?

Ok, maybe this should be posted in the Q thread...

---

I could be mistaken, but I thought he signed it already after claiming he has fixed the abuses

GCP12 said:

---

Larry S Ross said:

---

Anyone noticed Drudge is hardly if at all a player in any of this info? Where is he and his sources anymore?

---

Drudge has been really weird for a while now. Pretty much since the election.

---

Since the Alabama Special Election Drudge has been basically indifferent on politics.

I guess his being gay and Trump's support for Moore (who takes a biblical view of homosexuality) cheesed him off.

Gays always seem to put their sexual practices first in their lives.

aggiehawg said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

When is Trump scheduled to sign the FISA extension?

What if he plans on vetoing it while simultaneously releasing this memo to show the abuse?

Ok, maybe this should be posted in the Q thread...

---

No, it shouldn't. Hope he doesn't sign as it is now. The roll out is helping that.

---

I was more saying because of the theater of the theory, it belongs in q thread. Don't get me wrong, I would LOVE Trump to veto it. It would be his best move yet, by far.

txwxman said:

---

blindey said:

---

leftcoastaggie said:

---

blindey said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Guess the local lefties have finally decided to try and disrupt/hijack this thread.

---

just flag their bull**** and move on.

---

Rather stay in your echo chamber, I see.

---

you contribute nothing to this thread besides deflections and general trolling. Flagged this post too.

---

LeftCoastAggie simply can't keep himself from laughing at the gullibility of the majority of the posters on threads like this and the Q Anon thread. He reacts the way any well-informed person would; he points and laughs.

---

Ah, yes. Continue supporting criminals. The ends justify the means.

Will the networks dare cut to commercial, counting on America being as dumb as texags liberals?

aggiehawg said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Makes total sense that Mueller's investigation is tainted if what Gaetz alleges about Rosenstein is true.

---

Tainted? Always has been from the start.

BUT get Rosenstein out because of wrongdoing, name Rachel Brand as Deputy AG in charge of Mueller's investigation and Mueller has to answer to her on continuing justification for his inquiry...or she can terminate it.

I wouldn't recommend she terminate it immediately, unless Mueller himself or more of his staff are directly implicated. Let the House report go public, resonate with the American people to delegitimize the investigation from the get-go. Disapprove the budget request Mueller makes (every 90 days he submits that) and let it slip quietly into the night.

Mueller will have his own demons to face on Uranium One.

---

Replacing Rosenstein (who a DC establishment hack and personal friend of both Mueller and Comey) with Brand (who, unlike that worthless do-nothing hayseed Sessions, is a conservative firebrand), would be The Swamp's worse nightmare.

Speaker Ryan, make the memo available to the public and DRAIN THE SWAMP!

Adam Ag 98 said:

---

Will the networks dare cut to commercial, counting on America being as dumb as texags liberals?

---

That would bring more attention to it. There is a better chance half the country hears it and just shrugs. They can spin it after the fact.

Laura Ingraham just had two members of the committee on that went to the SCIF for the viewing, and said that not one democratic member of the committee showed up to actually view the documents, instead they held a 10-0 vote to not release them without ever seeing them.

They know what's in them and they know it kills the Mueller investigation dead in its tracks. Because if Rosenstein is fired and the next in line is moved up, she will likely end it, and Rosenstein has been complicit and covering to keep the Mueller deal going.

This is just stupid.

CrazyDayDuck said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Makes total sense that Mueller's investigation is tainted if what Gaetz alleges about Rosenstein is true.

---

Tainted? Always has been from the start.

BUT get Rosenstein out because of wrongdoing, name Rachel Brand as Deputy AG in charge of Mueller's investigation and Mueller has to answer to her on continuing justification for his inquiry...or she can terminate it.

I wouldn't recommend she terminate it immediately, unless Mueller himself or more of his staff are directly implicated. Let the House report go public, resonate with the American people to delegitimize the investigation from the get-go. Disapprove the budget request Mueller makes (every 90 days he submits that) and let it slip quietly into the night.

Mueller will have his own demons to face on Uranium One.

---

Replacing Rosenstein (who a DC establishment hack and personal friend of both Mueller and Comey) with Brand (who, unlike that worthless do-nothing hayseed Sessions, is a conservative firebrand), would be The Swamp's worse nightmare.

Speaker Ryan, make the memo available to the public and DRAIN THE SWAMP!

---

Please, please please bring in Gulliani.

stetson said:

---

CrazyDayDuck said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Makes total sense that Mueller's investigation is tainted if what Gaetz alleges about Rosenstein is true.

---

Tainted? Always has been from the start.

BUT get Rosenstein out because of wrongdoing, name Rachel Brand as Deputy AG in charge of Mueller's investigation and Mueller has to answer to her on continuing justification for his inquiry...or she can terminate it.

I wouldn't recommend she terminate it immediately, unless Mueller himself or more of his staff are directly implicated. Let the House report go public, resonate with the American people to delegitimize the investigation from the get-go. Disapprove the budget request Mueller makes (every 90 days he submits that) and let it slip quietly into the night.

Mueller will have his own demons to face on Uranium One.

---

Replacing Rosenstein (who a DC establishment hack and personal friend of both Mueller and Comey) with Brand (who, unlike that worthless do-nothing hayseed Sessions, is a conservative firebrand), would be The Swamp's worse nightmare.

Speaker Ryan, make the memo available to the public and DRAIN THE SWAMP!

---

Please, please please bring in Gulliani.

---

Wanna see the Libs lose it completely, just bring in Rudy.

Brand would be awesome. And bonus as if they trashed her too much it'd piss off women voters.

stetson said:

---

CrazyDayDuck said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Makes total sense that Mueller's investigation is tainted if what Gaetz alleges about Rosenstein is true.

---

Tainted? Always has been from the start.

BUT get Rosenstein out because of wrongdoing, name Rachel Brand as Deputy AG in charge of Mueller's investigation and Mueller has to answer to her on continuing justification for his inquiry...or she can terminate it.

I wouldn't recommend she terminate it immediately, unless Mueller himself or more of his staff are directly implicated. Let the House report go public, resonate with the American people to delegitimize the investigation from the get-go. Disapprove the budget request Mueller makes (every 90 days he submits that) and let it slip quietly into the night.

Mueller will have his own demons to face on Uranium One.

---

Replacing Rosenstein (who a DC establishment hack and personal friend of both Mueller and Comey) with Brand (who, unlike that worthless do-nothing hayseed Sessions, is a conservative firebrand), would be The Swamp's worse nightmare.

Speaker Ryan, make the memo available to the public and DRAIN THE SWAMP!

---

Please, please please bring in Gulliani.

---

Rudy 20 years ago would have been awesome. However, his time has passed.

Brand is the real deal.

Mueller does not want to deal with her. She will shut down his political witch hunt.

AG 2000' said:

---

Brand would be awesome. And bonus as if they trashed her too much it'd piss off women voters.

---

She could put up a #MeToo FaceBook post.

"I tried to drain the swamp but the men in DC would not respect a woman as acting Attorney General."

stetson said:

---

reb, said:

---

NSIAmfP

---

David Horowitz wrote a book, "Radical Son", in which he describes how the Communist Party in America grew from the 1920s through the 1950s despite the claims of Soviet gulags, torture and execution. It was all dismissed as anti-communist propaganda until the Mossad got an agent with a recording device into a politburo meeting in which they discussed the gulags. It was effectively the end of the Communist Party in America.

---

It did not end it...just forced it into the shadows. If you go back and read CPA literature and conference minutes from the 1920's, it pretty much lays out what the left is doing right now. Use race as a wedge to divide the nation (they viewed the race riots that occurred during the summer of 1919 as a major opportunity). Work to destabilize communities by delegitimizing law enforcement. Set the stage for revolution. Still using the same playbook.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Laura Ingraham just had two members of the committee on that went to the SCIF for the viewing, and said that not one democratic member of the committee showed up to actually view the documents, instead they held a 10-0 vote to not release them without ever seeing them.

They know what's in them and they know it kills the Mueller investigation dead in its tracks. Because if Rosenstein is fired and the next in line is moved up, she will likely end it, and Rosenstein has been complicit and covering to keep the Mueller deal going.

---

Told you all.

Can't claim ignorance if they never made the effort to read them. This is designed play to self-protect the Dem members on their home districts who are up for re-election and haven't quit yet.

I can see the ads now. Dem Rep "(fill in the blank) can't even vote to keep the government running, much less read an intelligence report about the largest abuse of our American intelligence agencies, ever. What is he/she being paid to do for you?"

In

Lock THEM up

It effectively ended the party, not the movement. The movement took over academia and exists today. Likewise, this will not end the liberalism/socialism that makes up the democrat party, but it could effectively end the party itself.

If you read pp. 111-117 of Simpson's testimony, he sounds like a crazed conspiracy theorist. It's deep stuff.

On my phone right now, but I'll check it out tomorrow

drcrinum said:

---

If you read pp. 111-117 of Simpson's testimony, he sounds like a crazed conspiracy theorist. It's deep stuff.

---

Oh, there's a conspiracy alright.

I'm liking where this is going.

The guys that I like are respect in the house are getting vocal about this and wanting to expose the trash.