Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,553,216 Views |
49302 Replies |
Last: 2 days ago by policywonk98
Just coming to post that. Simpson is losing all credibility.
Mueller has Simpson by the short ones. There's no way he leaves this whole without landing some huge fish.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
If Mueller hasn't got anything on trump, he needs to just shut the trump part of it down and make a public announcement stating same. If he's gonna be world prosecutor that goes on forever, it needs to be stated.
I honestly think that Trump's part in this has been done for some time, and Muller has let Ty Cobb know it, but has told them just to sit tight and let the real targets thinks that Mueller is still after Trump. The minute Mueller clears Trump publicly, they left is going to go berserk, and any left targets are going to lawyer up tight and start pleading the 5th. As long as they think Trump is still the target and the focus, they will keep relaxed and talking to their insiders in the DOJ and digging their own graves. Trump knows how to play the part, and it builds up his solid base a bit more. The next 30 days are going to change american political history and the swamp with be draining just as Trump said he would do. If mueller had anything on Trump they would already been closed in on him.Rockdoc said:
If Mueller hasn't got anything on trump, he needs to just shut the trump part of it down and make a public announcement stating same. If he's gonna be world prosecutor that goes on forever, it needs to be stated.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Has anybody come up with tangible evidence that Hillary funded the dossier? I'm sure she did, but what is the evidence?
Bank records showed that 10 days ago. The records also showed Barry''s Obama for America (Now called Organizing for Action) paid $900k to the same firm at the same time. According to their FEC filing they paid Perkins Coie, LLP $700,000.00 on 9/29/16. OFA in 2016, paid nearly $800,000 to Perkins Coie in 2016 alone, according to FEC records. The first 2016 payments to Perkins Coie, classified only as "Legal Services," were made April 25-26, 2016, and totaled $98,047. A second batch of payments, also classified as "Legal Services," were disbursed to the law firm on September 29, 2016, and totaled exactly $700,000. Payments from OFA to Perkins Coie in 2017 totaled $174,725 through August 22, 2017.Rockdoc said:
Has anybody come up with tangible evidence that Hillary funded the dossier? I'm sure she did, but what is the evidence?
https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2016&data_type=processed&committee_id=C00431445&recipient_name=PERKINS+COIE%2C+LLP&min_date=01%2F01%2F2015&max_date=12%2F31%2F2016
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Thanks
Absolutely. If you remember the Comey Testimony, when he was asked by Gowdy and Chafetz why the FBI never pressured the DNC or the DNCC to hand over their servers, Comey exclaimed that they had been examined my a trusted contractor that the FBI works with regularly. We all know now that this trusted firms was CrowdStrike, and CrowdStrike was the real author of that IC report claiming Russia hacked them and three agencies concurred (FBI, CIA, DIC) yet the media and dems went with the "17 IC agencies agree" narrative for months until it was proven to be false and that narrative died a slow death.drcrinum said:
The Last Refuge/TCTH also suspected CrowdStrike was one of the contractors in addition to Fusion GPS.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/952412091616514048.html
A new thread from The Last Refuge about HRC & the MSM spin now that the Trump dossier is a fake...only it has a humorous ending.
Ok, the dossier conspirators admit the aren't very good at their job and were royally duped ($12 million dollars by the clients goes down the drain) and everybody at the FBI admits they themselves are gullible idiots. Does that excuse the illegal activities that followed? The coalition of conspirators will not hold together under the finger pointing. It still ends badly for many people.
She is connected this way: She is the leader of her campaign. Her campaign completely coopted the DNC. Thats what allowed the money-laundering on the previous page to occur...Hillary's campaign effectively ran the DNC and had final say on everything. So Hillary == Hillary's Campaign == DNC. Anything the DNC did can be taken to mean it was a Hillary action. So Hillary/DNC paid Fusion GPS through a middleman, a law firm named Perkins Coie. They wanted to disguise it and claim attorney/client privilege if any attempt were made to reveal their clients actions. It didn't work, and the House Intel Committee has the bank records now.Rockdoc said:
Has anybody come up with tangible evidence that Hillary funded the dossier? I'm sure she did, but what is the evidence?
That's the 2nd tweet of this thread.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/951349053572317185.html
Can someone define
TCTH
CTH
I must've lost this somehwere
TCTH
CTH
I must've lost this somehwere
The Conservative Tree House
Conservative Tree House
You're not alone. This thread has so much information that is constantly evolving that it makes one's head spin trying to keep up.
Conservative Tree House
You're not alone. This thread has so much information that is constantly evolving that it makes one's head spin trying to keep up.
Perkins Coie is also the law firm that represents Obama for America. I started a thread some time back about this law firm being at the center of a large web.Quote:
So Hillary/DNC paid Fusion GPS through a middleman, a law firm named Perkins Coie. They wanted to disguise it and claim attorney/client privilege if any attempt were made to reveal their clients actions. It didn't work, and the House Intel Committee has the bank records now.
Did Ken Starr do the same when he couldn't find any Whitewater dirt on Bill Clinton? Just say'n.Rockdoc said:
If Mueller hasn't got anything on trump, he needs to just shut the trump part of it down and make a public announcement stating same. If he's gonna be world prosecutor that goes on forever, it needs to be stated.
There was so much dirt there that Starr got distracted.benchmark said:Did Ken Starr do the same when he couldn't find any Whitewater dirt on Bill Clinton? Just say'n.Rockdoc said:
If Mueller hasn't got anything on trump, he needs to just shut the trump part of it down and make a public announcement stating same. If he's gonna be world prosecutor that goes on forever, it needs to be stated.
stetson said:GCP12 said:Trump just retweeted this.GCP12 said:
This is an old article, but Paul Sperry just tweeted it out this morning. Not really sure what it means and may just be some self promotion on his part, but seems a little weird.
Trump reads TexAgs!
Not sure if everyone is reading the Q Anon thread but Q implies there is a link between Trump tweets and Q posts. /tinfoilhatengaged
https://qcode***.github.io
The stars are f a g
Also, CrowdStrike lines up perfectly with the April 2016 timeline.RoscoePColtrane said:
Absolutely. If you remember the Comey Testimony, when he was asked by Gowdy and Chafetz why the FBI never pressured the DNC or the DNCC to hand over their servers, Comey exclaimed that they had been examined my a trusted contractor that the FBI works with regularly. We all know now that this trusted firms was CrowdStrike, and CrowdStrike was the real author of that IC report claiming Russia hacked them and three agencies concurred (FBI, CIA, DIC) yet the media and dems went with the "17 IC agencies agree" narrative for months until it was proven to be false and that narrative died a slow death.
Records now show that DOJ/FBI suspended access of a <redacted> sub-contractor to raw FISA information in April 2016 ....and coincidentally, the following month CrowdStrike officially claims the DNC servers were hacked by Russians.
Mueller's closing in on the issue. Film and emails at 10...
I would expect the civil suit to which you refer will be dismissed and Manafort's lawyers will then try to attack Mueller's appointment and jurisdiction within the confines of the criminal indictment. IOW, expect multiple appeals before it is all said and done.drcrinum said:
Hmmm...Pretending he is doing something? Maybe this is just a distraction since Manafort is suing Mueller.
Now, if Rosenstein acts by creating a superceding order better defining Mueller's jurisdiction that includes Manafort's past actions unrelated to Trump? Then that order is subject to challenge under ex post facto principles. If Mueller didn't have the authority at the time of the indictment, a subsequent authorization wouldn't cure the original problem, IMO.
What happened to the scuttlebutt that Mueller was going to make additional charges on Manafort?? Never materialized?
I predict wall-to-wall Manafort news coverage, just keep in mind these crimes predate any Russian Collusion. But still, wall-to-wall coverage. Crime of the Century type of coverage?
I predict wall-to-wall Manafort news coverage, just keep in mind these crimes predate any Russian Collusion. But still, wall-to-wall coverage. Crime of the Century type of coverage?
Depends on whether the judge allows the cameras in. My guess is the cameras are barred.Just an Ag said:
What happened to the scuttlebutt that Mueller was going to make additional charges on Manafort?? Never materialized?
I predict wall-to-wall Manafort news coverage, just keep in mind these crimes predate any Russian Collusion. But still, wall-to-wall coverage. Crime of the Century type of coverage?
The Clinton Whitewater investigation lasted 4 yrs and ended without sufficient evidence.techno-ag said:
There was so much dirt there that Starr got distracted.
It first started with a special prosecutor in Jan 1994 ... and lasted 6 months without sufficient evidence. Then Congress reauthorized the independent counsel and a 3-judge panel appointed Ken Starr in Aug 1994 to resume the investigation ... and 3.5 years later, Ken Starr shut down the Whitewater investigation without sufficient evidence (Dec 1997).
Then a month later the phone rang with dirt on Clinton/Lewinsky and the rest is history.
Illegal surveillance since 2012? Just think of the potential ramifications? For instance...government contracts...permitting your donor buddy to secretly learn about a competitor's plans. Or in the political world...blackmail...dig up some hidden dirt...why did Judge Roberts suddenly flip his opinion on Obamacare. Remember this woman's statements:
Assuming this was limited to 702 abuse of NSA surveillance of Americans conv with non-citizens?drcrinum said:
Illegal surveillance since 2012? Just think of the potential ramifications? For instance...government contracts...permitting your donor buddy to secretly learn about a competitor's plans. Or in the political world...blackmail...dig up some hidden dirt...why did Judge Roberts suddenly flip his opinion on Obamacare. Remember this woman's statements:
Yup. Everybody knew they were crooked.benchmark said:The Clinton Whitewater investigation lasted 4 yrs and ended without sufficient evidence.techno-ag said:
There was so much dirt there that Starr got distracted.
It first started with a special prosecutor in Jan 1994 ... and lasted 6 months without sufficient evidence. Then Congress reauthorized the independent counsel and a 3-judge panel appointed Ken Starr in Aug 1994 to resume the investigation ... and 3.5 years later, Ken Starr shut down the Whitewater investigation without sufficient evidence (Dec 1997).
Then a month later the phone rang with dirt on Clinton/Lewinsky and the rest is history.
Except that when you enter the search parameters, all sorts of links appear, and those that don't apply are 'supposed' to be deleted. I believe it can be a broad net when manipulated appropriately (disguised), and if one doesn't sequester the info, who would know. Sort of like a fishing expedition...you never know what you will catch...but if you throw everything back into the ocean that you do catch, no one knows that you ever caught anything.benchmark said:Assuming this was limited to 702 abuse of NSA surveillance of Americans conv with non-citizens?drcrinum said:
Illegal surveillance since 2012? Just think of the potential ramifications? For instance...government contracts...permitting your donor buddy to secretly learn about a competitor's plans. Or in the political world...blackmail...dig up some hidden dirt...why did Judge Roberts suddenly flip his opinion on Obamacare. Remember this woman's statements:
How Valerie Jarrett was ever given security clearance and oval access is mind boggling, based on the massive amount of evidense to her years of her and her family being on various FBI watch lists, Jarrett appeared on the FBI's Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the USSR during the cold war era. Parents were radical registered communists, as was her late husband and his parents. Vernon Jarrett was held in a federal facility during the Bay of Pigs because he was on a watch list as well. Just a ton of red flags.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
I mentioned this very thing the other day and a couple of policy wonkers pooh poohed it. It's called a soft query. It's not official, and nothing can be used in legal proceeding without going back to the court and getting a warrant. It's taking a peak and just looking at information. It's done all the time.drcrinum said:Except that when you enter the search parameters, all sorts of links appear, and those that don't apply are 'supposed' to be deleted. I believe it can be a broad net when manipulated appropriately (disguised), and if one doesn't sequester the info, who would know. Sort of like a fishing expedition...you never know what you will catch...but if you throw everything back into the ocean that you do catch, no one knows that you ever caught anything.benchmark said:Assuming this was limited to 702 abuse of NSA surveillance of Americans conv with non-citizens?drcrinum said:
Illegal surveillance since 2012? Just think of the potential ramifications? For instance...government contracts...permitting your donor buddy to secretly learn about a competitor's plans. Or in the political world...blackmail...dig up some hidden dirt...why did Judge Roberts suddenly flip his opinion on Obamacare. Remember this woman's statements:
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
somewhere back in this thread is a link to a guy who prepared a timeline (each with a media link to an article for verification). I dumped it all into an Excel spreadsheet and printed it to read. It's the only way I've been able to keep track of all the players.stetson said:
The Conservative Tree House
Conservative Tree House
You're not alone. This thread has so much information that is constantly evolving that it makes one's head spin trying to keep up.
Featured Stories
See All
55:45
1h ago
1.4k
21:36
2d ago
3.3k
No. 13 Aggies dispatch East Texas A&M in Friday's home opener, 87-55
by Olin Buchanan
Keys to the Game: No. 23 Texas A&M vs. Lamar
by Luke Evangelist
TexAgs' TXHSFB Recap: Reviewing our coverage from Week 11
by TexAgs Recruiting
Scouting Report: Texas A&M vs. Lamar
by Tom Schuberth
sultanofshreveport
Longshot - Moronic request for tickets Aggies vs tsips
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
81