https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/945654673649922049.html

http://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/the-obama-administrations-defiance-inspectors-general-faulty-opinion-the

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-email-server-top-secret-217985


As a side note, batches of Hillary's e-mails from the Weiner laptop are now beginning to be released. This is going to really make HRC, Obama, Comey, Strzok & the FBI look bad, not to mention the ongoing dossier & U1 investigations, all awaiting the OIG report to be released in a little over 2 weeks. In this regard, I linked a few interesting historical tidbits to keep in mind:

1) There was no State Department Inspector General covering the period beginning January 11, 2008 for >5 years. Just think what happened over this period that such an IG should have been monitoring:
Hillary's private e-mail server, Hillary's Ghost Stories (Russian spy ring), Uranium One, Benghazi, Libya & Egypt & the Muslim Brotherhood, etc.
2) Obama's decision in July 2015 that DOJ officials could disregard any requests/inquiries from the DOJ Inspector General. And what happened here: Trump-Russia collusion investigation, illegal wiretapping, unmasking, Trump dossier & FISA warrants, late stages of Project Cassandra, etc.
3) Disclosure that Weiner's laptop not only held top secret e-mails, but also 'special action program' (SAP) e-mails. In fact, the IG investigating the laptop didn't even have clearance to examine the SAP e-mails.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

When I graduated (long time ago), I was recruited by the CIA but actually wanted to be a member of the FBI. Had a friend who was and regularly watched the old TV series. Today, my image/opinion of both are not what they used to be and that saddens me.

---

We are about the same age. I too was recruited by the CIA during law school but didn't want to move to DC. The FBI, CIA and JAG Corps were very visible in on-campus recruiting back then.

In fact, a guy who was behind me in law school ended up being the FBI Special Agent on a case in which I was involved. He recognized me immediately when we had our first meeting.

---

Interesting. I'm probably about 10 yrs older (6 yrs active duty, Vietnam). Technically should have been class of '68. I didn't pursue the CIA recruitment due to my thinking they somehow wanted me as a field agent (lol) when it was much more probable they sought me as a logistician to study satellite images of USSR transportation capacities/capabilities. It's how we came to the realization (at the time) that the Soviet army was more paper tiger than real threat to Europe and Reagan called their bluff.

I thought about Law School but decided (rightly so) that I wasn't a 'deep thinker' or 'logical' enough to be successful. Was better suited for my chosen career path...and way too boring for you legal eagles.

Have a happy/prosperous new year!

Nunes being back at full strength after being cleared by the IG has really thrown a wrench in the pushback from the deep state to keep Fusion GPS and those players out of the light. But I believe this letter to Nunes is what really put him in overdrive to go after Simpson and company and their links to the DOJ/FBI.

https://www.scribd.com/document/361744882/361738857-2017-10-16-Letter-to-Chair-D-Nunes

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Nunes being back at full strength after being cleared by the IG has really thrown a wrench in the pushback from the deep state to keep Fusion GPS and those players out of the light. But I believe this letter to Nunes is what really put him in overdrive to go after Simpson and company and their links to the DOJ/FBI.

https://www.scribd.com/document/361744882/361738857-2017-10-16-Letter-to-Chair-D-Nunes

---

I vaguely remember this. A tad of arrogant defiance IMO.

Well that letter is full of enough BS to piss me off. Doubt it would have a different effect on Nunes.

That letter is Torbush worthy.

Still anxious to see the reply to this letter from Nunes


https://www.scribd.com/document/368046067/Devin-Nunes-letter-to-Rod-Rosenstein

aggiehawg said:

---

Well that letter is full of enough BS to piss me off. Doubt it would have a different effect on Nunes.

That letter is Torbush worthy.

---

Congress has been nothing but dickless whiners for the last 3 decades. This letter told Nunes to GFY. Strategically, there is a good reason for Fusion to take this stance. They know Nunes and Company will only take these issues so far, and it Congress will not do anything of consequence.

OneNightW said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Well that letter is full of enough BS to piss me off. Doubt it would have a different effect on Nunes.

That letter is Torbush worthy.

---

Congress has been nothing but dickless whiners for the last 3 decades. This letter told Nunes to GFY. Strategically, there is a good reason for Fusion to take this stance. They know Nunes and Company will only take these issues so far, and it Congress will not do anything of consequence.

---

I guess that's why Nunes issued a stack of subpoenas pretty much calling their bluff

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

OneNightW said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Well that letter is full of enough BS to piss me off. Doubt it would have a different effect on Nunes.

That letter is Torbush worthy.

---

Congress has been nothing but dickless whiners for the last 3 decades. This letter told Nunes to GFY. Strategically, there is a good reason for Fusion to take this stance. They know Nunes and Company will only take these issues so far, and it Congress will not do anything of consequence.

---

I guess that's why Nunes issued a stack of subpoenas pretty much calling their bluff

---

They rejected the initial round of subpoenas, why wouldn't they do it again?

Congress is toothless.

OneNightW said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

OneNightW said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Well that letter is full of enough BS to piss me off. Doubt it would have a different effect on Nunes.

That letter is Torbush worthy.

---

Congress has been nothing but dickless whiners for the last 3 decades. This letter told Nunes to GFY. Strategically, there is a good reason for Fusion to take this stance. They know Nunes and Company will only take these issues so far, and it Congress will not do anything of consequence.

---

I guess that's why Nunes issued a stack of subpoenas pretty much calling their bluff

---

They rejected the initial round of subpoenas, why wouldn't they do it again?

Congress is toothless.

---

Well actually they weren't rejected they fought them under the argument that Nunes was recused while under EC and IG investigations. Nunes has been cleared and is no longer recused. It's a different ballgame now.

Quote:

---

Congress has been nothing but dickless whiners for the last 3 decades. This letter told Nunes to GFY. Strategically, there is a good reason for Fusion to take this stance. They know Nunes and Company will only take these issues so far, and it Congress will not do anything of consequence.

---

Have to have a competent AG and non-corrupt DOJ/FBI to prosecute criminal referrals from Congress. We haven't had that since before Janet "From the Bunny Planet" Reno. Ashcroft was too sick and Gonzales too weak. Holder and Lynch were corrupt and agenda driven.

Jeff Sessions days are numbered in 2018

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Jeff Sessions days are numbered in 2018

---

Fear you are correct. Actually, belay that last transmission. Hope you are correct. Need to make the change before the mid-terms though to get the confirmation through.

Need a firebrand who will take no prisoners and clean out the corruption. Enough of the Chuck Rhodes type toadies at DOJ.

Declaration of Scott L. Glabe, Deputy General Counsel for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for the US House of Representatives.

https://www.scribd.com/document/365208275/Declaration-of-Scott-L-Glabe-Deputy-General-Counsel-for-the-House-Permanent-Select-Committee-on-Intelligence

Interesting.... this from Special Counsel Mueller's office says a Russian professor tried for months to arrange meeting between then candidate Trump & Russia officials during 2016, an "open invitation," but Trump not interested, no meeting.



https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Still anxious to see the reply to this letter from Nunes


https://www.scribd.com/document/368046067/Devin-Nunes-letter-to-Rod-Rosenstein

---

Agree ; the response will be very interesting

SIAP: Even CNN?!

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

74OA said:

---

SIAP: Even CNN?!

---

Frankness from CNN. I never thought anyone there would see the light.....

Quote:

---

The field agents of the FBI should still retain the trust of the American people. Their honor and dignity has not been compromised; but the bureau's leadership ranks require a prompt and thorough house cleaning by the new director, Christopher Wray. The bureau's leadership has forfeited the reputation of a cherished American institution.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

CrazyDayDuck said:

---

stetson said:

---

Who/what is Q?

---

My bet is that it is Michael Rogers of the NSA.

Supposedly he was the one that met with then President-elect Trump in Nov '16 at Trump Tower and spilled the bills on the spying.

---

Tend to agree. If not Rogers, someone in his inner loop.

---

Most definitely.

Regardless, Rogers has played a major role in uncovering the shenanigans at the FBI and DOJ.

And I love how those who are so quick defend the FBI and Mueller are so silent on Rogers.

Cant Think of a Name said:

---

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

---

Happy New Year?

If even CNN is getting on board, then evidence of the politicization of the FBI's senior leadership must be overwhelming.

Cant Think of a Name said:

---

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

---

OIG report??

aggiehawg said:

---

Cant Think of a Name said:

---

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

---

OIG report??

---

Or Nunes' threats of Congressional Censure if FBI/DOJ don't turn over Dossier docs with explanation of their use by Jan. 3rd???

Not sure how that might be taken by those agencies, but the timing is "dead ahead"????

If CNN is distancing itself, some bad stuff is coming down.

Wait, I thought Trump was literally Hitler for criticizing the FBI. Morning Shmoe told me so.

Not sure which thread to put this on, but this is something I just realized from an older story regarding Trump Jr and wikileaks. In the below tweet, Trump Jr shows the communication that Wikileaks sent him. In there is a link to wlsearch.tk. If you go to that link, it is a page about Seth Rich. Has this been debunked already? The site could have easily changed ownership and been updated with this content, but interesting nonetheless.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/01/the-russian-collusion-narrative-was-as-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-explained-an-insurance-policy/#more-144082

Quote:

---

In October 2016, immediately after the DOJ lawyers formatted the FBI information (Steele Dossier etc.) for the FISA application, the head of the NSD, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, left his job. During his exit John Carlin informed the FISA court the DOJ-NSD frequently provided false information to the court to gain FISA warrants Read Here.....

Responding to a 2015 request by the DOJ Office of Inspector General, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates told the internal watchdog they cannot investigate the National Security Division. That's right, there was essentially no oversight on any activity happening inside the NSD.

In 2015 the OIG requested oversight and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58 page legal explanation saying, essentially, 'nope not allowed.' (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD......

The former head of the NSD, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, admitting their intentional misuse of the FISA court process is actual evidence of why Sally Yates kept the NSD operating without oversight.

Post election, the legal aides, career bureaucrats, investigators and agents within the entire ideological operation of the FBI and DOJ-NSD then transferred to the Robert Mueller investigation so they could keep a lid on any of their risk exposure and simultaneously maintain the entire false premise behind the Russian Collusion Narrative.
How did they get in the Mueller investigation? Through the assignment, advice and assistance of FBI Chief Legal Counsel, James Baker who would be the point person assigning people to assist his long-time friend, Robert Mueller.

See? That's where James Baker becomes exposed....

Mueller's entire Russia Conspiracy investigation was really just another way the players within the original scheme could keep a lid on the events in 2016 and still retain the insurance policy. That's why many of the FBI/DOJ "small group", the crew who cleared Hillary in the email investigation, were part of the Trump Operation, and later also assigned to the Mueller investigation. Controls were/are needed.....

However, the back-story to the FISA warrant is the FBI and NSD collaboration. The back-story to the FISA warrant is the cornerstone to expose this entire charade. The back-story to the FISA warrant contains action by the FBI and the DOJ upper-management and leadership. The back-story to the FISA warrant outlines the conspiracy and the nature of the relationships amid all the conspirators.

---

Very interesting read. I've pulled out relevant details, but it is better to read the entire article for overall perspective. Operating without oversight...the most transparent Administration in history.

Wonder when Mueller's ties to Larry Summers and the hedge funds, and all the money in the Cayman's comes into play? OCCO Jap European Fund, OCCO Eastern European Fund amongst others lurk in the shadows.

aggiehawg said:

---

Cant Think of a Name said:

---

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

---

OIG report??

---

Hawg/Coltrane, I understand the various "punishments/penalties" Congress can impose, but is contempt really any kind of a concern for someone at the DOJ/FBI? Holder suggested he didn't like it, but it never seemed to bother him publicly, and would it be serious enough for Priestap, McCabe, Rosenstein, etc. to be worried.

IF those docs are turned over by tomorrow, I'll guarantee you it won't be all of them. Honestly, why wouldn't they "bleach bit" them, as there appears to be no punishment for doing so?

Just a question.

Edited to make the sentence make sense. Thanks Coltrane.

fasthorses05 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Cant Think of a Name said:

---

I wonder what smoking gun is fixing to drop?

Must be pretty damning.

---

OIG report??

---

Hawg/Coltrane, I understand the various "punishments/penalties" Congress can impose, but is contempt really any kind of a concern for someone at the DOJ/FBI? Holder suggested he didn't like it, but it never seemed to bother him publicly, and would it be serious enough for Priestap, McCabe, Rosenstein, etc. to be worried.

IF those docs are turned over by tomorrow, I'll guarantee you it won't be all of them. Honestly, why would they "bleach bit" them, as there appears to be no punishment for doing so?

Just a question.

---

That's actually the textbook example of obstruction, a crime, the DOJ at the time just chose not to prosecute HRC and company. Destroying subpoenaed evidense it serious as hell, however you have to have an agency willing to prosecute.

Well, I kind of thought so, but the left tells me that as long as I didn't mean to "bleach bit" the information, or make all of our classified security information available for the entire world to see, then it's okie-dokie, and cool with any US code of law.