Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,548,184 Views | 49291 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by fullback44
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Prognightmare said:


Just more proof can never allow a Democrat control of all three branches again. Even two years from Jan 2009 to Jan 2011 was enough to inflict very serious damage.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SpreadsheetAg said:

drcrinum said:



http://archive.is/KoEtg

Perhaps Turkey & Erdogan per the above article is where Flynn has been cooperating with Mueller.
Whats that got to do with Russia Russia Russia?
I think the name of the game is: Find an unrelated potential or perceived crime on a pertinent witness, and then pursue the latter in order to coerce the witness into revealing information relevant to the Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Flynn (Turkey lobbying & Logan Act)...Manafort (Ukraine)...Cohen (Taxi medallions)...Papadopoulos ($10k Israeli bribe). Plus expand the game to a second level by crafting a scheme to ensnare the witness in a lie while investigating the potential or perceived crime, thereby bringing a definite chargeable offense to bear on the situation, providing more leverage to extract information...or even to coerce the witness into fabricating info (Corsi). Analogous to squeezing a lemon in order to end up with lemonade.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
drcrinum said:

SpreadsheetAg said:

drcrinum said:



http://archive.is/KoEtg

Perhaps Turkey & Erdogan per the above article is where Flynn has been cooperating with Mueller.
Whats that got to do with Russia Russia Russia?
I think the name of the game is: Find an unrelated potential or perceived crime on a pertinent witness, and then pursue the latter in order to coerce the witness into revealing information relevant to the Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Flynn (Turkey lobbying & Logan Act)...Manafort (Ukraine)...Cohen (Taxi medallions)...Papadopoulos ($10k Israeli bribe). Plus expand the game to a second level by crafting a scheme to ensnare the witness in a lie while investigating the potential or perceived crime, thereby bringing a definite chargeable offense to bear on the situation, providing more leverage to extract information...or even to coerce the witness into fabricating info (Corsi). Analogous to squeezing a lemon in order to end up with lemonade.
But what if -- just humor this for a second. There genuinely was NO collusion, no plotting, no scheme, nothing? In other words, nothing to discover related to the collusion charge. Are they also maneuvering to manufacture a case with false testimony like the Democrats did with Kavanaugh?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prognightmare said:


Jabba the Hutt, and every other House Democrat, just seems to think that anything they pass will automatically become law.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:


SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And another convergence with [17] thread... coincidence?
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Prognightmare said:


Jabba the Hutt, and every other House Democrat, just seems to think that anything they pass will automatically become law.
/The 53-47 GOP Senate and Trump VETO say hello...
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

drcrinum said:

SpreadsheetAg said:

drcrinum said:



http://archive.is/KoEtg

Perhaps Turkey & Erdogan per the above article is where Flynn has been cooperating with Mueller.
Whats that got to do with Russia Russia Russia?
I think the name of the game is: Find an unrelated potential or perceived crime on a pertinent witness, and then pursue the latter in order to coerce the witness into revealing information relevant to the Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Flynn (Turkey lobbying & Logan Act)...Manafort (Ukraine)...Cohen (Taxi medallions)...Papadopoulos ($10k Israeli bribe). Plus expand the game to a second level by crafting a scheme to ensnare the witness in a lie while investigating the potential or perceived crime, thereby bringing a definite chargeable offense to bear on the situation, providing more leverage to extract information...or even to coerce the witness into fabricating info (Corsi). Analogous to squeezing a lemon in order to end up with lemonade.
But what if -- just humor this for a second. There genuinely was NO collusion, no plotting, no scheme, nothing? In other words, nothing to discover related to the collusion charge. Are they also maneuvering to manufacture a case with false testimony like the Democrats did with Kavanaugh?

That's what Corsi is claiming they tried to do with him.
Do you believe the Russian's actually hacked the DNC server?
Is the Dossier factual?
Did Papadopoulos tell Downer the Russians had dirt on Hillary?
Did Flynn lie to Strzok in January 2017?
Etc.

It's all just a scheme to protect Obama & his Team from the illegal spying they were doing.

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Towns03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the opposition has told us why: #resist

This hoax has done a marvelous job of distracting everyone in government and caused untold chaos in the whitehouse. It has also drained a significant amount of political capital from the pres and the GOP in general.

RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:


Yep both sets. Original and the not so originals.. scrubbed
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fun times are over for K street. Register or be toast.

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not to mention Ex Post Facto.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Not to mention Ex Post Facto.
The Manafort case has set the precedent that SoL means nothing
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Not to mention Ex Post Facto.
The Manafort case has set the precedent that SoL means nothing


Very fake news.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Not to mention Ex Post Facto.
The Manafort case has set the precedent that SoL means nothing


Very fake news.
Well let's hope they continue to apply 18 U.S.C. 3292(a)(1) with as much gusto on Hillary and Obama as they did with Manafort then.



Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Sources tell me the targeted documents may provide the most damning evidence to date of potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), evidence that has been kept from the majority of members of Congress for more than two years.

The email exchanges included then-FBI Director James Comey, key FBI investigators in the Russia probe and lawyers in the DOJ's National Security Division, and they occurred in early to mid-October, before the FBI successfully secured a FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

The email exchanges show the FBI was aware - before it secured the now-infamous warrant - that there were intelligence community concerns about the reliability of the main evidence used to support it: the Christopher Steele dossier.

The exchanges also indicate FBI officials were aware that Steele, the former MI6 British intelligence operative then working as a confidential human source for the bureau, had contacts with news media reporters before the FISA warrant was secured.

The FBI fired Steele on Nov. 1, 2016 - two weeks after securing the warrant - on the grounds that he had unauthorized contacts with the news media.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Mulehead isn't going to let Flynn off after all.

Quote:

A grand jury is expected to hear evidence concerning a lobbying effort involving former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn's work for the Turkish government, even as the former Trump aide's role in the special counsel investigation appears to be coming to a close.

The New York Times reports that a grand jury in Virginia will likely hear evidence that Flynn was serving as an unregistered agent of the Turkish government in the U.S. days after the 2016 election.

In 2016, he penned an op-ed for The Hill attacking Fethullah Gulen, a Muslim cleric exiled from Turkey living in Pennsylvania.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/419981-grand-jury-to-hear-evidence-on-flynns-lobbying-work-for-turkey
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GCP12 said:


Quote:

Sources tell me the targeted documents may provide the most damning evidence to date of potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), evidence that has been kept from the majority of members of Congress for more than two years.

The email exchanges included then-FBI Director James Comey, key FBI investigators in the Russia probe and lawyers in the DOJ's National Security Division, and they occurred in early to mid-October, before the FBI successfully secured a FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

The email exchanges show the FBI was aware - before it secured the now-infamous warrant - that there were intelligence community concerns about the reliability of the main evidence used to support it: the Christopher Steele dossier.

The exchanges also indicate FBI officials were aware that Steele, the former MI6 British intelligence operative then working as a confidential human source for the bureau, had contacts with news media reporters before the FISA warrant was secured.

The FBI fired Steele on Nov. 1, 2016 - two weeks after securing the warrant - on the grounds that he had unauthorized contacts with the news media.



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1070447863262560256.html

Above is a thread on the significance of this new report by Solomon. It's rather clear that Nunes has seen this email chain between the FBI & DOJ, and that is why he is requesting that it be declassified (in addition to the Page FISA documents & the Ohr 302s.
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Priestap is officially gone now..cant remember if it was mentioned

Obama's FBI brass hollowed out, after latest resignation of key official

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obamas-fbi-brass-hollowed-out-after-latest-resignation-of-key-official
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pacecar02 said:

Priestap is officially gone now..cant remember if it was mentioned

Obama's FBI brass hollowed out, after latest resignation of key official

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obamas-fbi-brass-hollowed-out-after-latest-resignation-of-key-official
I wonder if he was the FBI official who was in the IG's report about sexual misconduct.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

pacecar02 said:

Priestap is officially gone now..cant remember if it was mentioned

Obama's FBI brass hollowed out, after latest resignation of key official

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obamas-fbi-brass-hollowed-out-after-latest-resignation-of-key-official
I wonder if he was the FBI official who was in the IG's report about sexual misconduct.
Priestap is FBI; the IG report was about sexual misconduct involving a senior DOJ official in the Office of Justice Programs (OJP).
BTW, Priestap is married into a Goldman Sachs family & lives in a $3+million dollar home.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Flynn's cooperation with Mueller involved lobbying by his partners with Turkey, then it must have something to do with the following (from 2017):

https://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/flynn-paid-ex-fbi-agents-behavior-analysts-in-lobbying-work-for-turkish-government/

Quote:

Flynn Paid Ex-FBI Agents, Behavior Analysts In Lobbying Work For Turkish Government


drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The latest from Solomon (on Hannity) on the FBI/DOJ email chain discussing the Dossier prior to submission of the Carter Page FISA application. Guess what? Comey was involved.

The Conservative Treehouse already has an interesting observation:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/05/john-solomon-discusses-latest-spygate-developments-with-sean-hannity/

Quote:

...
Wait.. A.. Minute.. James Comey is scheduled to appear on Friday right? Now ask yourself: why would the people feeding information to Solomon want him to push this story into the media bloodstream ahead of that testimony? Wouldn't earnest investigators prefer to question Comey about these emails without him having time to prepare?.

Think about it.




Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting info in these tweets about flake and Uranium.

Can I go to sleep Looch?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:



The latest from Solomon (on Hannity) on the FBI/DOJ email chain discussing the Dossier prior to submission of the Carter Page FISA application. Guess what? Comey was involved.

The Conservative Treehouse already has an interesting observation:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/05/john-solomon-discusses-latest-spygate-developments-with-sean-hannity/

Quote:

...
Wait.. A.. Minute.. James Comey is scheduled to appear on Friday right? Now ask yourself: why would the people feeding information to Solomon want him to push this story into the media bloodstream ahead of that testimony? Wouldn't earnest investigators prefer to question Comey about these emails without him having time to prepare?.

Think about it.





Or Joe Pientka


Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/william-barr-is-leading-attorney-general-candidate-in-trump-discussions/2018/12/06/468e8940-f905-11e8-863c-9e2f864d47e7_story.html

Quote:

William Barr is leading attorney general candidate in Trump discussions

Former attorney general William P. Barr is President Trump's leading candidate to be nominated to lead the Justice Department -- a choice that could be made in coming days as the agency presses forward with a probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to multiple people familiar with the deliberations.

Barr, 68, a well-respected Republican lawyer who served as attorney general from 1991 to 1993 under President George H.W. Bush, has emerged as a favorite candidate of a number of Trump administration officials, including senior lawyers in the White House Counsel's Office, these people said. Two people familiar with the discussions said the president has told advisers in recent days that he plans to nominate Barr.....

Barr shares at least one of the president's views on the probe being conducted by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. In 2017, when asked by The Washington Post about political donations made by lawyers on the special counsel's team, Barr said "prosecutors who make political contributions are identifying fairly strongly with a political party" and added: "I would have liked to see [Mueller] have more balance on this group."

Barr also wrote last year that the administration's decision to fire James B. Comey as FBI director was "quite understandable" because, in his view, Comey had usurped the power of the attorney general when he publicly announced his recommendation not to charge former secretary of state Hillary Clinton during the investigation of her private email server.




drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.dailycrusader.com/2018/12/first-doj-indictments-unsealed-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-mossack-fonseca-tied-to-money-laundering/

Quote:

FIRST DOJ INDICTMENTS UNSEALED: Clinton Foundation-Connected Bank "Mossack Fonseca" Tied To Money Laundering


I don't know if this is significant or not. The indictments originate from the US District Court SDNY.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg said:


I do appreciate the ole "it's happening" gif, but how many times have we really thought it was happening on this thread alone? A dozen?
First Page Last Page
Page 672 of 1409
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.