Topeka won't cure cancer. i.e. How many conservative profs in A&M's Anthropology Dept?nortex97 said:
Federal agencies need to be decentralized, as this has shown, from DC. I apologize to the good people of Wichita/Topeka/Omaha/Manhattan (KS) but that's where the DoJ/FBI and many others need to be relocated to. Hopefully Trump will take that up next year.
Sounds reasonable. Thanks!Larry S Ross said:
Go back a couple of pages and there is a theory there posted by DrCrinum. It's a tweet or article by shipwrecked.
Short answer she was brought in for a specific reason and her job is complete. P 1239 I believe.
If justice is served, yes. I will try to keep on the positive side and expect indictments.blindey said:
Durham isn't going to give a report. He's going to get indictments.
No one gets to do that. Government phones subject to government retention of records federal law.will25u said:
Rosenstein is boned on that one. He allowed that to happen even after Horowitz confronted Mueller and Rosenstein in August 2017.fasthorse05 said:
You know, in the Great Phone Wipe of 2020, no one to date mentioned anything about Rosenstein the Obstructor's phone. How many did he have? Was his destroyed by aliens from Remulak? Was it filled with sonnets and poems to his attorney wife?
Clinesmith could speak to intent, I hope.fasthorse05 said:
Another question about the SCO phone wipe.
Since we're all assuming this too will be investigated, does the AUSA HAVE to show intent to destroy evidence? I'm asking because as silly and stupid as the actions are, it kinda sounds like they might get away with that part, unless there's a RICO/Conspiracy type charge.
Am I in the ballpark?
And don't y'all think the pic of Andres (between Ahmad and Atkinson) looks like he could be Lyle Lovett's son?
God, I hate the blatant bias in our politicians, today. They don't give a sh-t about the truth. Also, how ironic that they are claiming political interference....idiots.will25u said:
So it begins. Time to ratchet up claims against Durham. Must be getting close.
ETA: An investigation into an investigation, into an investigation(sham).
Quote:
Attorney General Bill Barr has been strutting around in recent weeks like the boss that he is, laying the smack down on violent rioters, and giving speeches and interviews where he tweaks the media in more ways than one and warns of mail-in ballot fraud and what's to come if Democrats win big in the November elections.
As part of his media tour, Barr sat down on Monday to talk with longtime Chicago Tribune newspaper columnist John Kass on a variety of topics, and it was a barn burner of an interview.
On the highlight reel of things Barr told Kass was his response to the frenzied Democrat/media-fueled conspiracy theory that President Trump had cooked up some devious plot to steal the election and "seize power" in the event he loses. The remarks were given in the context of a discussion about election fraud and Chicago's notorious history of political and electoral corruption.
The words "crap" and "sh**" were used, if that gives you any indication of where he is on the matter:Barr also got right down to the heart of the matter regarding what this election meant for the future of America, and how scary it was that a "large segment of the people" helping decide the election "were probably never taught" about the guiding principles that make our country so great.Quote:
Some jurisdictions require "secrecy sleeves" to separate the ballot from the envelope that could identify a voter. But would you trust that sleeve in Cook County, home of Johnny Rocco?
"You know liberals project," Barr said. "All this bulls about how the president is going to stay in office and seize power? I've never heard of any of that crap. I mean, I'm the attorney general. I would think I would have heard about it. They are projecting. They are creating an incendiary situation where there will be loss of confidence in the vote."
"better" Why is that?aggiehawg said:
Barr is very serious and on fire.Quote:
Attorney General Bill Barr has been strutting around in recent weeks like the boss that he is, laying the smack down on violent rioters, and giving speeches and interviews where he tweaks the media in more ways than one and warns of mail-in ballot fraud and what's to come if Democrats win big in the November elections.
As part of his media tour, Barr sat down on Monday to talk with longtime Chicago Tribune newspaper columnist John Kass on a variety of topics, and it was a barn burner of an interview.
On the highlight reel of things Barr told Kass was his response to the frenzied Democrat/media-fueled conspiracy theory that President Trump had cooked up some devious plot to steal the election and "seize power" in the event he loses. The remarks were given in the context of a discussion about election fraud and Chicago's notorious history of political and electoral corruption.
The words "crap" and "sh**" were used, if that gives you any indication of where he is on the matter:Barr also got right down to the heart of the matter regarding what this election meant for the future of America, and how scary it was that a "large segment of the people" helping decide the election "were probably never taught" about the guiding principles that make our country so great.Quote:
Some jurisdictions require "secrecy sleeves" to separate the ballot from the envelope that could identify a voter. But would you trust that sleeve in Cook County, home of Johnny Rocco?
"You know liberals project," Barr said. "All this bulls about how the president is going to stay in office and seize power? I've never heard of any of that crap. I mean, I'm the attorney general. I would think I would have heard about it. They are projecting. They are creating an incendiary situation where there will be loss of confidence in the vote."
LINK
I feel better now.
Read my latest posts in the WSJ Barr thread and read the articles I linked. He's focused like a laser on the money men behind not only the rioting but also on the election fraud, since they are mostly the same people.Quote:
"better" Why is that?
Getting my hopes up for justice.aggiehawg said:Read my latest posts in the WSJ Barr thread and read the articles I linked. He's focused like a laser on the money men behind not only the rioting but also on the election fraud, since they are mostly the same people.Quote:
"better" Why is that?
And remember it is not a First Amendment issue when force and violence are involved. It's seditious conspiracy. A federal crime. And that crime can be the basis for RICO.
Any chance So-os (don't want to say his name) actually gets charged with anything?aggiehawg said:Read my latest posts in the WSJ Barr thread and read the articles I linked. He's focused like a laser on the money men behind not only the rioting but also on the election fraud, since they are mostly the same people.Quote:
"better" Why is that?
And remember it is not a First Amendment issue when force and violence are involved. It's seditious conspiracy. A federal crime. And that crime can be the basis for RICO.
I think there is now. Barr has been very uncharacteristically chatty the last month. He's mentioning RICO and seditious conspiracy often. Fomenting violence and aiding and abetting those who are instigating the riots requires money. Even if Soros himself isn't an exact target, nailing one of his foundations that a few billion dollars in assets would be big.Tailgate88 said:Any chance So-os (don't want to say his name) actually gets charged with anything?aggiehawg said:Read my latest posts in the WSJ Barr thread and read the articles I linked. He's focused like a laser on the money men behind not only the rioting but also on the election fraud, since they are mostly the same people.Quote:
"better" Why is that?
And remember it is not a First Amendment issue when force and violence are involved. It's seditious conspiracy. A federal crime. And that crime can be the basis for RICO.
Not holding my breath, but hoping.Quote:
We'll see but I like what I'm hearing from Barr.
Can't. The line of succession for the FBI is Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Associate Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Executive Assistant Director of the National Security Branch.VegasAg86 said:Wray is part of the problem. Boot him now and put Grenell in while waiting for the permanent replacement.drcrinum said:
About time, but is this Barr's bidding?
fifyredline248 said:
lol..."That probably made sullivan sh-t his pants"
If aggiehawg feels better we all feel better!aggiehawg said:Read my latest posts in the WSJ Barr thread and read the articles I linked. He's focused like a laser on the money men behind not only the rioting but also on the election fraud, since they are mostly the same people.Quote:
"better" Why is that?
And remember it is not a First Amendment issue when force and violence are involved. It's seditious conspiracy. A federal crime. And that crime can be the basis for RICO.
Public corruption unit in DOJ?rab79 said:fifyredline248 said:
lol..."That probably made sullivan sh-t his pants"
so what agency investigates judicial malfeasance? anyone?
There's some kind of a really funny joke based on your question, since I now believe everyone the DOJ is publicly corrupted, so that would be the place.Quote:
Public corruption unit in DOJ?
