Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,730,146 Views | 49406 Replies | Last: 18 hrs ago by Garrelli 5000
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:


The media will spin this as he is being defiant and standing up for "the rule of law" and DOJ overstepping in this case.

Or... Maybe he knows what is coming.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe Schiff is "Yuri"
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope there's a GJ indictment with Van Grack's name on it.

MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Makes him harder to question.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Makes him harder to question.
By whom?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houag80 said:

Adam Schiff needs to be hung by the neck until dead......after his conviction of course.


He looks like someone already tried that and he survived. Stick neck and bulging eyes.
ccatag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great job by so many with this thread.

This lately is reminding me of the earlier times of this thread when I would login to TexAgs and there might be 3 or 4 or more pages of posts before me to catch-up with. Haha

I hope Grennel continues to f with Schiff and carries through with the innuendo of his tweets and drops some bombs on the perpetrators and on Schiff. Grennel needs to soften up the battlefield.
Then I want to see Durham take the public stage and bring the attack. Somebody needs to pay a big price. In the end the truth of what happened needs to win the day. I pray this will be so.
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What does the Van Grack exit actually mean to the case?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Makes him harder to question.
I think he is going to be subpoenaed to answer questions on this. I don't think it will be that difficult.

He may plead the 5th, but that's a different issue.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LoudestWHOOP! said:

What does the Van Grack exit actually mean to the case?
He won't appear in court on behalf of the government anymore. But looking beyond that, Van Grack has been a pitbull on getting Flynn by any means necessary. With his removal, if Sullivan allows Flynn to withdraw his plea but not dismiss the case, the main impetus for actually going to trial against Flynn doesn't exist and DOJ can drop the case.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Makes him harder to question.
By whom?
GITMO Interrogators, I hope
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LoudestWHOOP! said:

What does the Van Grack exit actually mean to the case?
I think it's just one more layer of filth being scrubbed off to get to the truth, and that's a positive sign for lovers of justice.

It WILL be portrayed as Barr obstructing justice, but they're going to fight to hide from the light of day until the bitter end regardless.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/07/fbis-memo-exonerating-flynn-proves-its-time-to-investigate-comeys-corrupt-confidential-human-sources/

Interesting long detailed read by Professor Cleveland. Delves into the predicate for the CI investigation on Flynn. Lots of problems + it was opened based upon a lie (Halper). Worth a slow read.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

However, one detail contained in the closing document but omitted in the IG report concerning the predication jolts attention to the absence of a proper predicate.
In addition to noting that Flynn served on the Trump campaign, the closing memorandum provided as a rationale for opening an investigation into Flynn his "active TS/SCI clearance." This fact not only does not justify investigating Flynn, it cuts against the entire idea that Flynn may have been involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation.
Mere months before the FBI launched Crossfire Razor, the Obama administration's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), in April of 2016, renewed Flynn's "top secret/sensitive compartmented information" clearance. "That approval is significant," wrote Eli Lake in the Chicago Tribune. "The process for renewing a security clearance at that level is intense. It includes interviews with associates and friends and an extensive background check. Flynn took a polygraph test as part of his reapplication for the security clearance."
The timing of that April 2016 renewal is also significant because the FBI claimed two additional facts justified its launch of Crossfire Razor, but those facts pre-dated Flynn's TS/SCI clearance. Specifically, the closing document noted Flynn had ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, presumably Russia Today, for whom Flynn gave a speech in Moscow in December 2015 the basis of the final supposedly suspicious point.

Those facts were known before Flynn's TS/SCI clearance renewal. Additionally, before Flynn traveled to Russia in 2015 to speak at the dinner, he was briefed by the DIA. Flynn's attorney Sidney Powell told me that Flynn also briefed the DIA upon his return, and shared with the intelligence agency a thumb drive of information he had collected during his Russia trip.

Under these circumstances, it is beyond ridiculous that the FBI relied on Flynn's 2015 trip to Russia as providing a "factual basis" for suspecting that he was "involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security." Given that those events occurred after Flynn's TS/SCI clearance renewal, the FBI could have no "reasonable" basis to launch an investigation into him.

While the IG report concluded otherwise, Horowitz's team inexplicably omitted any mention of the FBI's reliance on Flynn's TS/SCI clearance renewal. Might that have been because Horowitz realized the predicate provided for the launch of Crossfire Razor crumbled when Flynn's top-secret-plus clearance was factored into the mix?
No predication. Zip, nada, zilch. Anything that happened before his top secret clearance was renewed (2015 Russian trip) had already been thoroughly investigated nothing untoward was found.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:


Yippee!! EAD, you MOFO!
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think.
Maroon and White always! EKU/TAMU
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Again. I'll get excited when someone gets disciplined.
Aegrescit medendo
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EKUAg said:

Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think.
I really hate that guy. Hope nothing but the worst for him in the future. He's scum.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Or... Maybe he knows what is coming.

Will, how could he really know what is coming? That is something for further analysis and discussion, don't you think?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BillYeoman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Case against Flynn dropped...

Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So no harm, no foul? They bankrupt him, threaten his family, drag him through the mud for years and then?

Aegrescit medendo
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:


Hell YES! WHOOOOOOOP!

I am absolutely GIDDY about this!
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I want to see the rest of the documents...unredacted.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


News is getting passed around.

So happy for Flynn and his family!
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:


WHOOP!!! HE GONE!!!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Van Grack is running away from the DoJ. Might not have a law license for too much longer.





BillYeoman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



News is getting passed around.

So happy for Flynn and his family!
Who was the ditz (unmade bed?) that said Powell had only gotten Flynn closer to jail?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

aggiehawg said:



News is getting passed around.

So happy for Flynn and his family!
Who was the ditz (unmade bed?) that said Powell had only gotten Flynn closer to jail?
Don't recall. I have many detractors here and I ignore most of them anyway.
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was the other lawyer, handle ends with 98.
Maroon and White always! EKU/TAMU
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildcat said:

So no harm, no foul? They bankrupt him, threaten his family, drag him through the mud for years and then?


They are dropping it, yet I don't think all parties are free and clear. Dropped, yes, but it did happened. So perhaps Flynn can renew pursuit for civil charges against attorneys, Strzok, Pientka...

I think it would depend on if Barr allows the Gov't, or Gov't employees to be sued in this case... we'll see, I guess.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE?

#IStandWithGeneralFlynn
First Page Last Page
Page 1078 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.