Transcript of a speech Given at an LDS "Missionary Farewell"

6,377 Views | 121 Replies | Last: 19 yr ago by ibmagg
El Sid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow, ibmagg, now you have joined in on the personal attacks as well? That should be beneath you.

Your entire post just supports my arguments!

quote:
Satan's main work has always been, when truth was on the earth, to provide a "counterfeit" alternative that would decieve the people.
I agree wholeheartedly! How do you spot such counterfeits?

How did the uneducated Ellen White write such beautiful and powerful text?

What if a person who prays honestly receives a spiritual testimony that the works of Ellen White were indeed a message from God? How could one evaluate or test that spiritual testimony?

Can you answer these questions? Or do you just prefer to insult me?
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did Luther, Calvin, Wesley, Alexander Campbell, Roger Williams, John Wesley, Billy Graham, The Pope and all the other religious reformers or protestors get such different answers? God is not the author of confusion! The best counterfeit is that which comes closest to the truth or at least contains some of the elements. I think it was you that I told how you could find out for yourself "the truth"

I think it is interesting that the beautiful text that she wrote is still not accepted as "scripture" bu her adherents -it must not contain any "truth" as far as they are concerned, or it should be revealed truth ie. scripture.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have discussed some very interesting things on this thread. It's too bad that it has descended into the customary Texags name calling. I suppose that's inevitable, though.

George Bernard Shaw once said: "In polite company, one does not discuss sex, politics, or religion. Of course, without sex, politics, or religion, there is not much worth discussing."


El Sid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
The best counterfeit is that which comes closest to the truth or at least contains some of the elements.
Again, I agree!
quote:
I think it was you that I told how you could find out for yourself "the truth."
You told me that I could find out if the Book of Mormon was true by reading it and praying about it with a sincere heart.

That does not answer my questions about Ellen White.

1) How did the uneducated Ellen White write such beautiful and powerful texts?

2) What if a person who prays with a sincere heart and receives a spiritual testimony that the works of Ellen White were indeed a message from God? How could one evaluate or test that spiritual testimony?
Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those other guys don’t even really rate on the level of Luther and Calvin. Also, the answer is "sin". Each of those others listed have some elements of humanism, an exaltation of trust in and focus on mans ability and will. There in lies the difference. All of those other than Luther and Calvin could be classified as semi-pelagians.
El Sid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
p.s. Here are some more notes on Ellen G. White and the SDAs:

In official publications the SDA church continues to defend Ellen White, and maintains there was no difference in the degree of inspiration she received from that received by Bible writers (Review & Herald, 4 October 1928, p. 11; “Source of Final Appeal,” Adventist Review, 3 June 1971, pp. 4–6; G. A. Irwin, Mark of the Beast, p. 1; “The Inspiration and Authority of the Ellen G. White Writings,” Adventist Review, 15 July 1982, p. 3; Ministry, October 1981, p. 8; see also, Judged by the Gospel, pp. 125–30). In their June, 2000, General Conference they voted to more aggressively affirm and support the “Spirit of Prophecy through the ministry of Ellen White”(Adventist Today, [online: July 2000] ) .
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
After the martyrdom of Joseph
Yes he was murdered, yes he may fit the technical definition, but I would hardly call him a martyr.

Compare him to a true martyr of the early church and you will see there really is no comparison.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meets all the criteria for historians other the the critics of the Church.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid, have you read her texts? Where they in fact written by her or edited by others. Can satan inspire eloquent falsehoods. I am sure you feel that is the case with Joseph. Why won't the membership of her church accept her writings as scripture? What revealed truths are there in them other than "Sat." should be the Sabbath?
El Sid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wierd stuff is going on here. Where is my post?
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^
^
^
Divine intervention. You've been criticizing too many prophets.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:

Meets all the criteria for historians other the the critics of the Church.



Laughable. He shot three men in a rage after his brother was shot, then tried to run away - leaving his friends behind - by jumping out a window. Compare that to a real martyr like Stephen who knelt and prayed for the men killing him.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
RAB91: Yes he was murdered, yes he may fit the technical definition, but I would hardly call him a martyr.

ibmagg: Meets all the criteria for historians other the the critics of the Church.


I'll briefly recap the circumstances surrounding Joseph Smith "martyrdom" and leave it to you to decide if there are parallels with early Christians who died for their faith. The mob that killed him on June 27, 1844 was indeed an anti-Mormon gang. They attacked the jail because they wanted to kill Joseph. However, the situation was a bit more complicated than mere religious enmity.

Unlike early Christian martyrs, Joseph Smith was not in jail for his beliefs. Instead, he was in the slammer awaiting charges for destruction of private property. Facing political and spiritual opposition in Nauvoo early that summer, Smith ordered the destruction of a rival newspaper, the Expositor, operated by his former First Counselor, William Law, who opposed polygamy. A Mormon gang smashed the press and destroyed all outstanding issues of the paper. These were the basic charges against Smith, but they occurred amidst a much larger controversy.

The explosive issue of polygamy was bubbling under the surface at this time. Joseph was known at the time for promising fellow Latter-day Saints guaranteed eternal salvation if they would allow him to have their wives. Smith had previously propositioned William Law's wife, and the wife of Law's friend, Robert D. Foster. Law said no and Smith had Law excommunicated, but Law wouldd't stand for it. He formed a rival sect and started an opposition newspaper in the town the Mormons founded. It was a clear challenge not only to Smith's leadership of the church, but also to the way he conducted himself personally.

Smith was killed during a period of civil insurrection followed his mobilization of the Nauvoo Legion, his private army. At the time, Nauvoo was the second largest city in Illinois, behind Chicago. The Nauvoo Legion was the second largest armed force on the continent, behind the United States Army. Smith wielded power in the state that rivaled the governor's, and this alarmed the Mormons' neighbors. Joseph's personal conduct alarmed his own followers.

Illinois Governor Thomas Ford responded to Smith's activation of the Nauvoo Legion by calling up the National Guard. Smith fled to Iowa for a while, but soon received a letter from his first wife, Emma, asking him to return. The Illinois governor promised him safe passage if he would surrender to face charges. He did so on June 24, 1844 and was jailed in Carthage. Three days later, a religiously motivated mob calling itself the Carthage Grays attacked the jail. There is no doubt about their mission. They killed Smith's brother Hyrum with a single shot. Joseph responded by firing his revolver (a curious concession by the Carthage jailer) six times, netting three misfires and three hits on his attackers. After uttering a coded Masonic plea for help, he died in a hail of gunfire.

Compare this story with other accounts of Christian martyrdom and decide for yourself.

Sources: D. Michael Quinn, The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power (Salt Lake City: Signature] 1994) p. 137-141.

Richard N. Ostling and Joan K. Ostling, Mormon America: The Power and the Promise (New York: HarperCollins, 1999) p. 13-17.

[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 4/25/2006 8:24a).]
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DualAg -Do you KNOW who the Osterlings are? They are not friends of the Church. Outside of two of Joseph's loyal friends who are the only ones who were there that survived the attack, what was the coded masonic pleas for help? Do you really belive that Joseph went around propostioning the wives of his followers and could have expected anyone to have remained with him. If you are willing to make the effort, you can find out for yourself why Law was excommunicated. (hint -he couldn't keep his pants buttoned)

He was in jail for his religious beliefs, the destruction of the press being the latest pretext. Many presses had been destroyed in Ill. without this kind of an action. Joseph and a group of his followers had already left the United States when they crossed the Miss. into Indian territory. He was beyond the scope of Gov. Ford. Joseph came back willingly after entreaties from some of his friends who had followed after them. They explained the Governor had guaranteed his protection, and after the trial he would be set free, and in the meantime things would be so much easier on the saints. Joseph declared that if his life meant no more than that to his friends, then it didn't mean anything to him. He declared that he was going as the lamb to the slaughter but with a concience devoid of offense towards God or man. He volutarily turned himself in after he had left the US and in legal jurisdiction.

That was not a group of legal authorities who murdered him, but a group of "christians" who were so proud of their intended act that they came with faces painted black so that they could not be recognized. While Joseph was in jail, several of his followers wanted to bring the Nauvoo Legion to free him, but he would not allow it. After the deed was done people fled the surrounding cities for they were convinced the Legion would kill every man, woman and child. They would have done it had it not been for the Church leaders who remained and told the people what the Lord wanted done. Having had wives, husbands and children murdered in the past by the mobbers, for many this was the time to even the score many times over! But that was the way of man, not the Lord for he had much greater and longer lasting plans for the Kingdom.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soupy -there was no rage, and the attempt to defend his friends (I am sure you would not understand this) and then lead the mob away (according to his two friends), was an attempt to save them because Joseph knew he was target number one.

PS -it was rumored that Alexander Campbell ordered the hit. An opportunity to eliminate a religious rival that was costing him many tithe paying members to the LDS faith.

[This message has been edited by ibmagg (edited 4/24/2006 5:52p).]

[This message has been edited by ibmagg (edited 4/24/2006 5:53p).]
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:

PS -it was rumored that Alexander Campbell ordered the hit. An opportunity to eliminate a religious rival that was costing him many tithe paying memebers to the LDS faith



This is a lie.

This is something you made up after you found out that I am related to Alexander Campbell.

Again, another fruit of your lack of character is making up things like this. I would have thought that being Mormon, you would hold yourself to higher standards than to make up and spread lies about the dead.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you say. Do you have any proof that this rumor is false? Haha -I thought not, so it must be true! With the scurrilous things you love to repeat about Joseph, I think it would definitely be a character genetic trait that you have inherited. My condolences.
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Do you KNOW who the Osterlings are? They are not friends of the Church.
Typical ibm approach... anybody who writes something negative to his church is anti-mormon.
quote:
He was in jail for his religious beliefs, the destruction of the press being the latest pretext.
Wrong. Nobody is saying that there wasn't religious overtones, but he broke the law when ordered the destruction of the printing press. Didn't you say that mormons are some of the most patriotic people? Destroying a printing press and going against freedom of speech sure sounds pretty red, white, and blue.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Study what they were trying to do. Free speech does not allow you to yell fire in a crowded theatre -or to incite a riot or relirous or civil ferment. There would have been violent actions taken based on the lies being printed. They were hoping to bring about this type of reaction from the saints. Joseph felt that it was within his authority to close it down because of the danger it represented to peace and good order within the community.
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Joseph felt that it was within his authority to close it down because of the danger it represented to peace and good order within the community.

You seem to have told yourself this so many times you believe it now. I'd be curious if the other mormons on the board agree with you on this one.

I guess if you consider writing anti-polygamy articles and articles against Joseph Smith's political ambitions the same as yelling 'Fire', there is probably not much common ground we share.

[This message has been edited by RAB91 (edited 4/24/2006 6:52p).]
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
DualAg -Do you KNOW who the Osterlings [sic] are? They are not friends of the Church.


Well, excuse me for not relying on "friends of the church" for my history. Should I always go to faithful Catholic historians for the histories of the Pope, or to born-again faculty members at Liberty University for the history of Evangelical Christians? For that matter, is it necessary to consult with a patriotic German when I want to read about the history of the Third Reich?

Yes, I know who the Ostlings are. Richard N. Ostling is a well-respected religion writer for the Associated Press. He's a former Time Magazine correspondent who wrote 23 cover stories, and has also covered religious subjects for CBS Radio and the Newshour with Jim Lehrer on PBS.

Joan K. Ostling teaches English and Journalism. She's also a former writer and editor for the U.S. Information Agency, and a freelance newspaper writer and editor. They are well-respected within their profession.

They are not Evangelicals trying to convert Mormons. They wrote a very evenhanded book. You should pick up a copy.

quote:
Outside of two of Joseph's loyal friends who are the only ones who were there that survived the attack, what was the coded masonic pleas for help?


Joseph was trying to use the coded Masonic plea for help from unknown Freemasons in the crowd: "Oh, Lord, my God. Is there no help for the widow's son." Unfortunately, he was gunned down before he could complete the second sentence.

Maybe this isn't so unbelievable if you'll read the passage on Freemasonry in the Encyclopedia of Latter-day Saint History, published in the year 2000 by Desert Book--a project of three BYU professors.

quote:
In the early summer of 1841, the Masonic order in Illinois granted dispensation for the Saints to establish a lodge in Nauvoo. Within a few months, more than 1,500 Latter-day Saint men, including Joseph Smith, had been initiated into lodges in Nauvoo and Iowa. There were more Latter-day Saint Masons than there were non-LDS Masons in all the other Illinois lodges combined (p. 718).


Is it unbelievable to you that when Joseph Smith faced the barrel of his assassins' guns he would utter a coded call for help from any other Masons who happened to be nearby?

BTW, have you ever wondered about the genesis of your temple endowment ceremony, especially the part at which the candidate for endowment stands at the veil and talks to God through the curtain? That's unadulterated Freemasonry, so much so that, according to the most recently cited source, the Masons later took umbrage and withdrew all recognition of LDS lodges. The Mormons' sin: They admitted women to the temple!

quote:
Do you really believe that Joseph went around propositioning the wives of his followers and could have expected anyone to have remained with him?


Yep. You'd be surprised what a prophet of God can get away with.

In 1997 Todd Compton published In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Of the thirty-three plural wives of Joseph he documented, there were at least 11 polyandrous unions in which Joseph's new wife was already married to another man, without a divorce having taken place. In addition, Joseph married four sister pairs and one mother-daughter pair. Compton says that in at least eight of these circumstances, the original husbands stood as witnesses for the sealing to Joseph. Some continued to live with their original husbands, but also visited Joseph. As the Ostlings state, Jospeh often used such a proposal as a loyalty test, asking close friends for their wives and daughters.

quote:
If you are willing to make the effort, you can find out for yourself why Law was excommunicated. (hint -he couldn't keep his pants buttoned)


It sounds like Joseph couldn't either! The Church-approved Encyclopedia of Mormonism says that Joseph took at least 28 plural wives. D. Michael Quinn's research reveals 48. Fawn Brodie, author of the Joseph Smith biography that got her excommunicated, No Man Knows My History, also lists 48.

quote:
He was in jail for his religious beliefs, the destruction of the press being the latest pretext. Many presses had been destroyed in Ill. without this kind of an action.


What kind of logic is this? Many people had been murdered and raped in Illinois without any kind of punishment. However, the state did have jails where they put lawbreakers like Joseph Smith when they were caught.

quote:
He volutarily turned himself in after he had left the US and in legal jurisdiction.


If I commit a crime and flee to Mexico, should I receive accolades, or at least consideration for sentencing mitigation, if I come back voluntarily? So what? He turned himself in to face the charges. It wasn't a capital crime, and he shouldn't have been murdered, but he was in jail on legitimate charges.

quote:
That was not a group of legal authorities who murdered him, but a group of "christians" who were so proud of their intended act that they came with faces painted black so that they could not be recognized.


Nobody is defending the mob's action. They all should have been held accountable at the bar of justice.

quote:
Joseph felt that it was within his authority to close it down because of the danger it represented to peace and good order within the community.


Who had the political power in Nauvoo? If the rival newspaper was indeed a danger to peace and order in the community, why not go through the city fathers, whom he controlled, and have it shut down legally?

Why send a mob in the dead of night to break in, smash the press to pieces, and destroy all stored printed copies?

[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 4/24/2006 8:36p).]
Football&Finance
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wow..this thread has been raging for quite a while.

i just thought i'd weigh in with the agnostic perspective and say that you've ALL been lead astray by very human organizations, which at times sacrifice the pursuit of Truth for gains of power.

a couple questions for the LDS members:

1) why are the plates golden? did god or some angels inscribe them and hide them in North America, or were they transferred there by men and forgotten over time. the reason i ask is because Men are the ones so infatuated with gold, and the power it brings. gold is to be respected and revered is what the whole history of western civilization teaches us. so did god make the gold plates or men? or did joseph smith do the predictable thing and make the plates gold while fabricating his story.

2) does the church of JC&LDS teach that wealth is an indication of piety and holiness? also, why such large families? i understand why the original purpose..survival..but why continue in a nation as economically developed as the US. (are you similar to the catholic church in your approach to birth control, abortion, etc?)

3) everyone always bashes the polygamy thing, but hey it's cool, i understand. yall were a fledgling religion struggling to survive the harsh territory. does the official explanation of the church go along those lines?

[This message has been edited by conver2sations (edited 4/25/2006 3:13a).]
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The plates were originally inscribed by mortal men who were prophets in their day. There were three classes of plates:

(1) The plates of Nephi which were of two kinds (a)the Larger Plates which were more devoted to the secular history of the peoples concerned and (b) the Smaller Plates which were concerned mostly with sacred records.

(2)The Plates of Mormon, contained an abridgment from the Plates of Nephi, made by Mormon, with many commentaries and a continuation of the history by himself, and with further additions by Moroni, son of Mormon.

(3) The Plates of Ether, containing a history of the Jaredites, which account was abridged by Moroni, who inserted comments of his own, and incorporated the record with the general history under the title, Book of Ether.

(4) The Brass Plates of Laban, brought by the people of Lehi from Jerusalem, and containing Hebrew Scriptures and genealogies, many extracts from which appear in the Nephite records.

The period covered by the Book of Mormon annals extends from B.C. 600 to A.D. 421. In or about the latter year, Moroni, the LAST of the Nephite historians sealed the sacred record, and hid it up unto the Lord, to be brought forth in the latter days, as predicted by the voice of God through his ancient prophets. In A.D. 1827, this same Moroni, then a resurrected personage, delivered the engrave paltes to Joseph Smith.

The Jaredites were the first great civilization to be on the American continent approximately B.C. 2500. Their civilization was destroyed by the Lord because of their wickedness and remnants were found when Lehi and his familiy landed in B.C. 600. They were a part of the people who had tried to build a tower to heaven and Lord confounded their language and scattered them.

Gold is precious and desireable for several reasons. The most obvious is its beauty; secondly is its scaricity; and thirdly is its incredible "wear" characteristics. I feel certain that the permanency of gold made it the most desireable to engrave on since it was going to be stored for centuries and gold does not rust.

The eleven additional witnesses who saw and handled the plates testified as to the curious workmanship engraved on them and that they definitely had the appearance and heft of gold.

Wealth is definitely not a mark of piety per se. Wealth is as much a "test" as it is a blessing. "To whom much is given, much is required".

Because we believe in a premortal existence, we know that there are many waiting their turn to come to earth. Brigham Yong stated the position of the Church as it relates to birth control; "There are multitudes of pure and holy spirits waiting to take taberancles, now what is our duty? To prepare tabernacles for them; to take a course that will not drive these spirits into the families of the wicked, where they will be trained in wickedness, debauchery and every species of crime. It is the duty of every man and woman to prepare tabernacles for all the spirits they can". The commandment to multiply and replenish the earth has not been suspended. The earth is far from full.

Plural marriage served basically two purposes: It was part of the "restitution of all things" and it was to raise up a righteous seed. It was never the "fun and games" that would normally come to mind. It can be practiced ONLY when the Lord specifically commands it and only the Lord's Prophet has this key of authority. Only he can authorize its practice under the direction of the Lord. Plural marriage was practiced all though Old Testament times on an infrequent basis as the Lord commanded.

Any more questions, I am sure some of the LDS posters will be happy to answer.

[This message has been edited by ibmagg (edited 4/25/2006 1:02p).]

[This message has been edited by ibmagg (edited 4/25/2006 1:05p).]
Modano
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know of no time in the Old Testament in which "plural marriage" was practiced "as the Lord commanded."

From what I can tell, every time the Patriarchs took more than one wife, it ended up in tragedy. This is most easily seen with Solomon and Jacob. Even Abram caused great problems for all mankind when he lay with Hagar.

[This message has been edited by Modano (edited 4/25/2006 2:14p).]
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
So you say. Do you have any proof that this rumor is false? Haha -I thought not, so it must be true!


I realize that logic, truth and honor are traits that have missed you, but you cannot prove a negative.

Besides, you made up the ridiculous assertations - can you show ANY source for them. Show where Campbell was rumored to have ordered a hit on anyone.

Of course you cant, and that just shows what a dispicable liar and fraud you are, Bob. I am ashamed that you went to Texas A&M, and the other LDS members on here should be ashamed that you are a member of their church. While they hold themselves well and in good esteem, you are a liar and a fraud.

quote:

Study what they were trying to do. Free speech does not allow you to yell fire in a crowded theatre -or to incite a riot or relirous or civil ferment. There would have been violent actions taken based on the lies being printed.

I have studied what Smith was trying to do. He was shutting down a newspaper who was exercizing their first amendment right to free speech and freedom of the press, when Joseph Smith - an agent of the Government - shut them down by force because they published things that hurt his reputation. They were publishing how Smith was a polygamist - something that Smith denied, but history accepts.

Smith violated the Illinois State Constitution and arguably the US Constitution, and he was rightfully jailed for that.


If the Times-Picayune published a story about how Ray Nagan is an inept leader, and it was his ineffective leadership which caused dozens of deaths - Ray Nagan would have no right or authority to shut them down using the police or any local militia. The Times-Picayune, like the Nauvoo Expositor, have the very American right to freedom of the press - one of the most essiential rights held by our people and one of the reasons why we formed our own nation - so we would not have to live in fear of a tyrranical government. Unfortunately, Joseph Smith was more concerned with his reputation than the liberty and freedom of American citizens.

quote:
I feel certain that the permanency of gold made it the most desireable to engrave on since it was going to be stored for centuries and gold does not rust.


Take a look at the bottom of your Aggie ring. Are all the little bumps exactly like they were when you got it 40 years ago? What about the sides? Your ring is 50% or less gold, to make it stronger and last longer. However, it still rounds down with very little force on it. Not all that permanent.

Now take plates and bury them with the continual movement and shifting of the earth for thousands of years. Probably gonna be some rounding off of letters.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soupy -in case you lose too much sleep over this, I was just giving you a taste of your own medicine and I can tell it doesn't taste all that good.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I lose no sleep over a liar and a fraud like you. I am simply taking great joy in pointing out that the fruit of your LDS teachings is fraud, lies and hypocracy.

I have done none of these things. Anything I have posted something I thought was correct and was later shown as wrong, I corrected myself and apologized promptly.

What you are doing and what I am doing is nothing alike. You are a liar and have no honor, and I am ashamed that someone like you went to Texas A&M.

[This message has been edited by Guitarsoup (edited 4/25/2006 2:55p).]
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Modano -Let's begin with something simple. Who commanded the Jews that if a man's brother died, while married and whose wife was without child, the surviving brother was to take his dead brother's wife as a plural wife? This practice still continues today among the orthodox Jews. Since it is aginst the law of the land, the wife refuses the brother's offer. If I remember right, she does so by the removal of her shoes.

David, as a polygamist, did that which was right
in the eyes of the Lord until he took the wife of Uriah. "In Kings 15:5 we read "Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord, and turned not aside from ANYTHING that he commanded him ALL the days of his life, save ONLY in the matter of Uriah".

Solomon, who had hundreds of wives and concubines (secondary wives) his situation was truy an abomination because he took unathorized, non-israelite, pagan wives and concubines. God warned him not to have these foreign, pagan, plural wives and concubines, because they would turn his heart away from God, which they did. He was not critized for the hundred of Israelite women that were his wives and concubines.

Why out of all the Biblical Kings and Prophets who were polygamists, were David and Solomon singled out for criticism by the Lord? Because they sinned in the taking of "unlawful" wives, i.e. David in the case of Bathsheba and Solomon with his foreign wives.

If David or Solomon were comitting sin in the sight of the Lord, why didn't He come down on them like a ton of bricks when they took wife number 2?

Problems in any of the ancient prophet's lives can not be blamed on plural marriages. That is a conclusion on your part. The Lord has said that he forbids the practice of plural marriage excepts when he makes the exception for his specific purpose.
OldArmyAggie94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ibmagg - To answer your question - Southern Baptist

Answer a question for me - In your personal opinion what do you believe it takes for a person to go to Heaven?



ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soup -you need to lighten up -or better yet more emerging thought. You wear your feelings on your sleeves. You like to "dish it out" but you don't take it quite so well. You have printed, if I remember correctly, almost every negative charge made against Joseph or the Church, no matter how baseless or discredited. I know you know that the "fruits" of the Restored Gospel are the envy of almost all who are knowledgeable about them.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OldArmyAggie94 -A fair question. Since you are Southern baptist and so was my wife and I, I will try to give you a complete an answer as I can. First Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, Repentance, baptimism by immersion by those who have the priesthood authority delegated from God to perform this ordinance, and the Laying on of hands (by those in authority) for the Gift of the Holy Ghost. To be married in a holy temple of the Lord and be sealed to my wife for time and all eternitiy. To seek after my kindred dead, as much as possible, and do for them their work in the temple that they can not do for themselves. To exercise my faith on a daily basis and repent of my sins. To attend my Church meetings on a regular basis, renewing my baptismal covenants and magnifying my church callings -whatever they may be. To live a moraly clean and honorable life. In effect to put on Christ in my life and to endure to the end, for it is not over, till it's over. I believe I am saved in the celestial kingdom by the grace of Christ after all I could do myself. He makes up the difference. Salvation is a process, not an event. Please ask any and all questions that you want.

PS I am not interested in being "saved" in the telestial or terrestial kingdom, as glorious as they are. President John Taylor said it best: "The kingdom of God or nothing"!

[This message has been edited by ibmagg (edited 4/26/2006 11:57a).]
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Let's begin with something simple. Who commanded the Jews that if a man's brother died, while married and whose wife was without child, the surviving brother was to take his dead brother's wife as a plural wife? This practice still continues today among the orthodox Jews. . . . Why out of all the Biblical Kings and Prophets who were polygamists, were David and Solomon singled out for criticism by the Lord? Because they sinned in the taking of "unlawful" wives, i.e. David in the case of Bathsheba and Solomon with his foreign wives.


Ibmagg,

Is it your contention that all of Joseph Smith's plural wives were 'lawful' wives in accordance with the Old Testament precedent you cited? Or was each one lawful merely because God told Joseph it was okay to add that particular women to his concubine?

[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 4/26/2006 9:54a).]
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see that it could well be both. What was interesting was thateach sister was told to go home and to take it to the Lord if it was not the Lord's will. Each time they came back with answer that they had had it revealed to them that is was, and as several related before they humbled themselves in prayer, they were sure Joseph was in error. Go figure!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:



Soup -you need to lighten up -or better yet more emerging thought. You wear your feelings on your sleeves. You like to "dish it out" but you don't take it quite so well. You have printed, if I remember correctly, almost every negative charge made against Joseph or the Church, no matter how baseless or discredited. I know you know that the "fruits" of the Restored Gospel are the envy of almost all who are knowledgeable about them.



I will not "lighten up" when you are making up complete lies about my family. You are a liar, a fraud, and therefor a worthless human being.

You are an embarrassment to Texas A&M and an embarrassment to the good people at the LDS.

You need to come clean with the fact that you made up these baseless lies. The Bible fortold what would happen to people like you.

quote:
But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur.

Revelation 21.8

Have fun.


Too much of a coward to admit you made up those heinous lies. Instead, you just turn the attack back on me. It is the true nature of your character coming out in these posts, Bob.

At least we can all see the good in the LDS people like Liam and Bizag.

You are the LDS equivalant of what Brennan Manning was saying when he preached this (later made famous by dc Talk):
quote:
The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today... is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips and walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is simply what an unbelieving world finds unbelievable.
ibmagg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I gave you the "lie" so YOU might know how it feels when others see you so enthusiatically repeat lies, half-truths and rumors as "truth" that they know are not true. Joseph is not here to defend himself, but you are. If you love and care about your ancestor so much, why would you ever leave his church. You are doing much more to dishonor his memory that the little satire that I made up.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.