Protestant conversions to Catholicism on the increase

5,570 Views | 100 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Law361
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

29% of RCs & 23% of OXs attend religious services "at least once a week.


Do orthobros spend more time talking trash on the internet than going to church?
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Pablo said:

Quote:

29% of RCs & 23% of OXs attend religious services "at least once a week.


Do orthobros spend more time talking trash on the internet than going to church?


I'll say this.

It has been years, but I've met at least 2 EO from this board in person. Both are great and genuine believers.

I've also been to several EO churches in Houston.

There is certainly a divide along the cultural and the converted lines.

KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

There is certainly a divide along the cultural and the converted lines.

This.

I have no doubt that the EO folks on here are my brothers in Christ even if they don't fully accept me as such. They all seem to have converted from Protestantism to EO and, as such, they focus on what the EO is supposed to be as opposed to what it may be in reality.

One of the most influential persons in my parents' life was a gentleman who was Greek by ancestry but born and raised at first in Turkey (until the Great Population Exchange in 1923 when his family relocated to Greece). He left the Orthodox Church and became an evangelical Protestant (the horror!). He was deeply spiritual and extraordinarily intelligent and ended up having a lifelong ministry to officers in the US military. My dad wrote his biography. His view of the Orthodox Church was that it was completely dead and merely a tool for power and control by its leadership.

It's easy to point out all of the flaws in American churches (which are very real) but more difficult to return the favor to the EO since it is still relatively rare and has not achieved a place of cultural dominance in America. If we lived in geographical areas where it was common and culturally dominant, it would face the same or perhaps even more criticisms from us.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLiving06 said:

Captain Pablo said:

Quote:

29% of RCs & 23% of OXs attend religious services "at least once a week.


Do orthobros spend more time talking trash on the internet than going to church?


I'll say this.

It has been years, but I've met at least 2 EO from this board in person. Both are great and genuine believers.

I've also been to several EO churches in Houston.

There is certainly a divide along the cultural and the converted lines.




No doubt. I have been to many EO liturgy services, and met many EO people.

Not all converts are like that, but there is definitely something in the water when it comes to a lot of these younger male converts

Law Of The Quad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After years of Evangelical putting their members back under the law, it seems logical to join a more consistent corner of the faith that agrees. The idea that yes Jesus forgave you, now take your second chance and behave so that you don't get stuck in Purgatory, or go home an do this or that so that your sins are forgiven, make sense to works plus.

Once Protestants teach the same grace plus theology you get these results.

The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Law Of The Quad said:

After years of Evangelical putting their members back under the law, it seems logical to join a more consistent corner of the faith that agrees. The idea that yes Jesus forgave you, now take your second chance and behave so that you don't get stuck in Purgatory, or go home an do this or that so that your sins are forgiven, make sense to works plus.

Once Protestants teach the same grace plus theology you get these results.



Are you saying that you're witnessing evangelical churches teaching that something like "good behavior" is necessary after coming into the faith, and this is leading them to Catholicism?

If so, what should be preached in those churches instead?
Maximus Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Banned said:

10andBOUNCE said:

I don't have time to make this a research project but Pew Research indicates that Christians are leaving BOTH Catholic and Protestant traditions faster than those joining. This is the real problem.

Furthermore, Pew also indicates that in general, more Catholic brethren leave for Protestant circles that the other way around. I hear that is because they actually have access to the Bible rather than just the fathers

As a Catholic that was a former Protestant convert from cradle- Catholicism, I can say that evangelical churches can be a breath of fresh air, in a sense, for cradle Catholics as it really simplifies the faith. Just read your bible was easy for me to wrap my head around. I eventually found it lacking, but it served an importanrt role in my life. But I only went that way because my Catholic upbringing had convicted me that God was real.

Unfortunately alot of evangelical types leave Christianity altogether because of the rigid biblical literalism that some branches teach. As a Catholic, the concept of evolution, or eternal hell or any number never shook my faith because of the way the Church teaches on thos topics, and I am grateful for that. For many fundamentalists, these are earth shattering issues. Most of these types went atheist when they left their churches. The rise in those leaving going to the Catholic or EO church instead of atheist is aided by the increase in access to church history, for which I'm extra grateful.


I really struggle with the bolded part. If the bible is the sovereign word of God how could it be lacking in any way? And if it is lacking you would be relying on man in some way to make your faith whole, which the bible tells us all man has been and will continue to be sinful by nature.
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2 Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
Maximus Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10andBOUNCE said:

2 Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

Amen
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He didn't say the Bible was lacking, he said the approach of just read your bible is lacking.
Thaddeus73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That scripture verse is talking about the OT, because the NT hadn't been written yet. Do you really think the OT is complete without the new?
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From Wiki:
" Since the 1960s, Pentecostalism has increasingly gained acceptance from other Christian traditions, and Pentecostal beliefs concerning the baptism of the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts have been embraced by non-Pentecostal Christians in Protestant and Catholic churches through their adherence to the Charismatic movement. Together, worldwide Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity numbers over 644 million adherents.[16] While the movement originally attracted mostly lower classes in the global South, there is a new appeal to middle classes.[17][18][19] Middle-class congregations tend to have fewer members.[20][21][22] Pentecostalism is believed to be the fastest-growing religious movement in the world.[23].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecostalism

From 1900 at the inception of Pentecostal-Charismatic Christianity in Kansas in the US heartland, some 640 million plus adherents. There are charismatic Catholics, Methodists and Baptists. And they don't just increase by procreation either.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTExan said:

From Wiki:
" Since the 1960s, Pentecostalism has increasingly gained acceptance from other Christian traditions, and Pentecostal beliefs concerning the baptism of the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts have been embraced by non-Pentecostal Christians in Protestant and Catholic churches through their adherence to the Charismatic movement. Together, worldwide Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity numbers over 644 million adherents.[16] While the movement originally attracted mostly lower classes in the global South, there is a new appeal to middle classes.[17][18][19] Middle-class congregations tend to have fewer members.[20][21][22] Pentecostalism is believed to be the fastest-growing religious movement in the world.[23].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecostalism

From 1900 at the inception of Pentecostal-Charismatic Christianity in Kansas in the US heartland, some 640 million plus adherents. There are charismatic Catholics, Methodists and Baptists. And they don't just increase by procreation either.

I've been very interested in and open to Pentecostalism but haven't been able to find any real-world evidence to substantiate its claims. In fact, all my efforts to investigate it have led to dead ends, at best, and outright false claims, at worst.

I attended a Southern Baptist church in Albuquerque back in the 80s that was pastored by a guy from a Pentecostal background from South Africa, of all things. While not rejecting Pentecostalism, he stated that he had prayed constantly for receipt of the miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit but had never received them. That has been my experience as well.

I'd love your response to and thoughts on my comments.
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KingofHazor said:

UTExan said:

From Wiki:
" Since the 1960s, Pentecostalism has increasingly gained acceptance from other Christian traditions, and Pentecostal beliefs concerning the baptism of the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts have been embraced by non-Pentecostal Christians in Protestant and Catholic churches through their adherence to the Charismatic movement. Together, worldwide Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity numbers over 644 million adherents.[16] While the movement originally attracted mostly lower classes in the global South, there is a new appeal to middle classes.[17][18][19] Middle-class congregations tend to have fewer members.[20][21][22] Pentecostalism is believed to be the fastest-growing religious movement in the world.[23].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentecostalism

From 1900 at the inception of Pentecostal-Charismatic Christianity in Kansas in the US heartland, some 640 million plus adherents. There are charismatic Catholics, Methodists and Baptists. And they don't just increase by procreation either.

I've been very interested in and open to Pentecostalism but haven't been able to find any real-world evidence to substantiate its claims. In fact, all my efforts to investigate it have led to dead ends, at best, and outright false claims, at worst.

I attended a Southern Baptist church in Albuquerque back in the 80s that was pastored by a guy from a Pentecostal background from South Africa, of all things. While not rejecting Pentecostalism, he stated that he had prayed constantly for receipt of the miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit but had never received them. That has been my experience as well.

I'd love your response to and thoughts on my comments.


What can I say? God is sovereign and distributes gifts as needed in the body of Christ. I have seen "bogus miracles" among Pentecostals and charismatics because they "needed" to manufacture proof to validate what they believed and have also witnessed things which I can only describe as miraculous- a person with a chronic heart condition being raised up from a hospital sickbed quite without medical intervention to live years beyond his medical prognosis. We cannot map what God is going to do and tragedy will befall us as it will humankind. The joyful worship of Pentecostals does not deny this: it simply witnesses that in the midst of tragedy and worldly problems the people of God can still experience "joy unspeakable and full of glory" as described in 1Peter 1:8.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus Johnson said:

The Banned said:

10andBOUNCE said:

I don't have time to make this a research project but Pew Research indicates that Christians are leaving BOTH Catholic and Protestant traditions faster than those joining. This is the real problem.

Furthermore, Pew also indicates that in general, more Catholic brethren leave for Protestant circles that the other way around. I hear that is because they actually have access to the Bible rather than just the fathers

As a Catholic that was a former Protestant convert from cradle- Catholicism, I can say that evangelical churches can be a breath of fresh air, in a sense, for cradle Catholics as it really simplifies the faith. Just read your bible was easy for me to wrap my head around. I eventually found it lacking, but it served an importanrt role in my life. But I only went that way because my Catholic upbringing had convicted me that God was real.

Unfortunately alot of evangelical types leave Christianity altogether because of the rigid biblical literalism that some branches teach. As a Catholic, the concept of evolution, or eternal hell or any number never shook my faith because of the way the Church teaches on thos topics, and I am grateful for that. For many fundamentalists, these are earth shattering issues. Most of these types went atheist when they left their churches. The rise in those leaving going to the Catholic or EO church instead of atheist is aided by the increase in access to church history, for which I'm extra grateful.


I really struggle with the bolded part. If the bible is the sovereign word of God how could it be lacking in any way? And if it is lacking you would be relying on man in some way to make your faith whole, which the bible tells us all man has been and will continue to be sinful by nature.

As Zobel said, I have not claimed the word of God to be lacking. It's the process of me reading my bible and coming to a full understanding of the full Truth that I found lacking. For example:

The book of James is the only book that uses the term "faith alone" and it says, quite clearly, that we aren't saved by faith alone. The reading was incredibly clear and plain, and yet the two Baptist pastors that tried to explain it seemed to be jumping through hoops to do so. I still followed their interpretation for a time, but that was the first instance of "I thought scripture was supposed to be really clear"

Then came scripture alone itself. 1 Timothy 3:14 says Paul is only writing because he hasn't been able to make it in person yet. So he wouldn't need to write this letter that's in the bible if he didn't think there may be any travel snags?

And in the next verse he says the church is the pillar of truth. Getting a good rebuttal to this was impossible.

Then we had John 6 and what Jesus meant about "eat my flesh".

It went on for awhile for me. There were different interpretations to the same verses and it left me in a state of Christian relativism. As long as you call yourself Christian and "believe" in Jesus, you're good. But then the "free grace" vs "cheap grace" distinction entered the chat and I threw my hands up. Thankfully I had a friend who introduced me to church history (which sadly I either never was or never paid attention to in Catholic School). God didn't leave us a book and tell us to fend for ourselves.

I believe 100% of the bible to be the inspired Word of God, and I also believe the Church is the inspired Bride of Christ, who is the Word. I don't think Christ would leave His Bride unprotected from serious theological error
T dizl televizl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Severian the Torturer said:

AgLiving06 said:

Severian the Torturer said:

AgLiving06 said:

10andBOUNCE said:

I don't have time to make this a research project but Pew Research indicates that Christians are leaving BOTH Catholic and Protestant traditions faster than those joining. This is the real problem.

Furthermore, Pew also indicates that in general, more Catholic brethren leave for Protestant circles that the other way around. I hear that is because they actually have access to the Bible rather than just the fathers


Javier Perdomo did a look at this exact thing as part of a substack:

Are Protestants becoming Roman Catholic: Are Protestants Mass-Converting to Roman Catholicism?

Religious practices: Who is More Devout: Roman Catholics, Orthodox, or Protestants?


T
wo long reads, but you are correct. Rome is losing many more people to Protestant groups than Protestants joining Rome.

Yes, I would agree.

Respectfully, we're getting your best and brightest, and you're getting our guys looking for a great coffee shop and a place the kids like to go to.


No better example of someone who didn't read the links.


Sorry I'm not going to be swayed by the substack of one *checks notes* Javier Perdomo



Sorry I'm not going to be swayed by the post of one *checks notes* Severian the Torturer
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Character from one of the greatest sci fi books of all time
Maximus Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still struggle with the concept of "faith alone" salvation. I need to talk with my pastor about it.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus Johnson said:

I still struggle with the concept of "faith alone" salvation. I need to talk with my pastor about it.

What is "faith alone"? If I am placing my faith in Jesus, this means I have to "do" something. What does that look like? If faith without works is dead, how can we say it's "faith alone"? When I asked my then-pastors and friends about this, I'd always get the same two answers.

The answer of "well if you're saved, you're going to want to do good works" always fell flat for me. We see people who were definitely Christian struggling to do the right thing in the New Testament, and there are numerous warning against falling away. So what if I, like them, don't want to do good works and avoid the bad? Did I "do" faith wrong? Did God not actually change my heart? Is there something wrong with me? Why does that happen to people? Am I tricking myself into thinking I'm a believer, and therefore unsaved? And if I'm in charge of fixing that situation, we're back to me "doing" something. Monergism (God makes you have faith and there is nothing you can do about it) is that only answer to this type of "faith alone". Enter Calvinism.

The other answer I would get were cheap grace-ish answers along the lines of "as long as you believe in Jesus, you're saved". If your actions do not comport with the Christian life after being saved, it's not really a problem. If you fail to produce fruit in your life, that's ok. Believing that you need to produce fruit means you think you have to "earn" something. This was very problematic for me because you have to cut away numerous passages in order for that to work.

That's why the term "faithfulness" fits better. Yes, it is faith that saves us. But faith is an action. We "do" faith when we trust in God and follow His ways instead of the ways of the world. We aren't "earning" anything. We're simply following Him, trusting that He is leading us in the right direction. When we fall into sin that isn't a mere fleeting issues, it's because we lose that trust that His way is good and start to lean back on our own abilities/understanding of the world. Salvation is His path, not ours. He is the one calling us. He is the one giving us the grace to keep to the narrow way. All we're doing is cooperating with Him or not.

"Faithfulness" is a term I think all but Monergists (Lutheran/Reformed/Calvinists) and Cheap Grace types can agree on. "Faith alone" or "faith plus works" creates a verbal rift between traditional faiths (Catholic/EO) and Arminian types that doesn't need to exist. "Faith alone" was used by Reformers for the very reason of creating a stark distinction in theology where both can not be right.
Severian the Torturer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

Character from one of the greatest sci fi books of all time



AND the writer is a Catholic, an Aggie, and invented the machine that slices pringles, you can't beat that
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That cover art goes hard
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, take it to the Nerdery forum, guys.
Maximus Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love this explanation and frankly have never thought about it that way. You hit on this and did a great job of explaining so I am not trying to re-hash, just explaining the root of my questioning the faith alone doctrine.

Modern Protestant churches all use the same phrase "it is through faith alone in Christ that we are saved. It has nothing to do with your works". I have a problem with the alone word in this phrase. I think words matter, and to me, this implies that the day one says they have faith in Jesus Christ they are saved and can continue on with their worldly life. I know that is not what the modern church intends for this to connotate. But again, words matter and that is what is repeated. The brother of Jesus clearly did not have this viewpoint and expressed it many times:

2:17 - Also, faith itself, if it does not have works it is dead
2:24 - You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone
2:26 - For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead

Having faith in Jesus Christ requires active participation by his followers. There are active decisions a follower of Christ has to take in order to follow him. My heart has been transformed from stone to flesh, but the evil one is still prowling around like a roaring lion and sin feels good to my wicked body. Just saying I have faith in Christ does not deliver me to sin it delivers me from sin.

I just think that the "Faith alone" message connotates to little Timmy in the back row that he can continue on with his sinful life just by saying he has faith in Jesus and the Bible absolutely does not say that.

Thank you for your message Banned. Helped clear some things up for me.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happy to help. I think many Arminian influenced Protestants still use the term because it feels like they're tying themselves back to the reformation, but Luther and Calvin would reject their iteration of "faith alone". If you look into how the result of Arminius (a Calvinist/reformed pastor) intentionally shifted away from monergistic "faith alone" (espoused by Calvin and Luther) resulted in the Synod of Dort and a bunch of church splits, you can see how problematic "faith alone" has been historically.
Thaddeus73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have a protestant friend who says I shouldn't do good works. Why? Because then I could boast about them. I explained to him that in the Catholic Church, Jesus is the vine and we are His branches, so the good works I do are really Jesus working through me. He still said I shouldn't do them.

I was reminded of the words of Jesus...John 10:32
Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?"
Maximus Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am getting baptized this Sunday after a year plus of following Jesus. My life has completely changed in a year. I no longer desire most of the things I used to and now has a burning desire to know Jesus more.

My wife and I's path through salvation together has deepened our relationship to a level I did not think it could ever get to and will change my family tree forever
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thaddeus73 said:

I have a protestant friend who says I shouldn't do good works. Why? Because then I could boast about them. I explained to him that in the Catholic Church, Jesus is the vine and we are His branches, so the good works I do are really Jesus working through me. He still said I shouldn't do them.

I was reminded of the words of Jesus...John 10:32
Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?"


I don't actually believe this story. You seemingly have unending "protestant friends" for every example you want to make to show whatever strawman you want to make about Protestantism.

But, lets see what Luther says. He in fact coined the term "anti-nomianism" which was the very view that if I have faith, then I I don't have to do good works:

Antinomianism - Wikipedia

Luther in his preface to Romans:

" a living, creative, active and powerful thing, this faith. Faith cannot help doing good works constantly. It doesn't stop to ask if good works ought to be done, but before anyone asks, it already has done them and continues to do them without ceasing. Anyone who does not do good works in this manner is an unbeliever ... Thus, it is just as impossible to separate faith and works as it is to separate heat and light from fire!"

The issue that I see most often is that Rome either willfully or not misunderstands the entire argument.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maximus Johnson said:

I am getting baptized this Sunday after a year plus of following Jesus. My life has completely changed in a year. I no longer desire most of the things I used to and now has a burning desire to know Jesus more.

My wife and I's path through salvation together has deepened our relationship to a level I did not think it could ever get to and will change my family tree forever

Praise Jesus!

The Bible does warn against backsliding after coming to have faith. I'm certainly not saying you will experience this. I'll simply say that if you do feel some of those old feelings come back sometime in the future, it happens and it doesn't mean you're faith is defective and that you never really believed. It also doesn't mean it's ok to revert back to your old ways because you're saved anyways. I think you know all that, but I've seen many people struggle with these issues when God allows new challenges into your life for the sake of your growth in faith.

God bless you and your wife!
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgLiving06 said:

Thaddeus73 said:

I have a protestant friend who says I shouldn't do good works. Why? Because then I could boast about them. I explained to him that in the Catholic Church, Jesus is the vine and we are His branches, so the good works I do are really Jesus working through me. He still said I shouldn't do them.

I was reminded of the words of Jesus...John 10:32
Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?"


I don't actually believe this story. You seemingly have unending "protestant friends" for every example you want to make to show whatever strawman you want to make about Protestantism.

But, lets see what Luther says. He in fact coined the term "anti-nomianism" which was the very view that if I have faith, then I I don't have to do good works:

Antinomianism - Wikipedia

Luther in his preface to Romans:

" a living, creative, active and powerful thing, this faith. Faith cannot help doing good works constantly. It doesn't stop to ask if good works ought to be done, but before anyone asks, it already has done them and continues to do them without ceasing. Anyone who does not do good works in this manner is an unbeliever ... Thus, it is just as impossible to separate faith and works as it is to separate heat and light from fire!"

The issue that I see most often is that Rome either willfully or not misunderstands the entire argument.

Surely you're aware of the cheap grace issue in evangelical circles right now. Johnny Chang (a young, influential "pastor") even says it's wrong to pray for forgiveness because we've already been forgiven.

Just because something doesn't apply to your branch of Protestantism doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Severian the Torturer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgLiving06 said:

Thaddeus73 said:

I have a protestant friend who says I shouldn't do good works. Why? Because then I could boast about them. I explained to him that in the Catholic Church, Jesus is the vine and we are His branches, so the good works I do are really Jesus working through me. He still said I shouldn't do them.

I was reminded of the words of Jesus...John 10:32
Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?"


I don't actually believe this story. You seemingly have unending "protestant friends" for every example you want to make to show whatever strawman you want to make about Protestantism.

But, lets see what Luther says. He in fact coined the term "anti-nomianism" which was the very view that if I have faith, then I I don't have to do good works:

Antinomianism - Wikipedia

Luther in his preface to Romans:

" a living, creative, active and powerful thing, this faith. Faith cannot help doing good works constantly. It doesn't stop to ask if good works ought to be done, but before anyone asks, it already has done them and continues to do them without ceasing. Anyone who does not do good works in this manner is an unbeliever ... Thus, it is just as impossible to separate faith and works as it is to separate heat and light from fire!"

The issue that I see most often is that Rome either willfully or not misunderstands the entire argument.


Would you please for context also include the part where he says to "sin boldly"

I'll hang up and listen
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are lots of wacko teachers and leaders in Protestantism, but they don't define Protestantism. There are lots of wacko teachers and leaders in the RC church, as well. I see that Notre Dame has an incoming Board member who is aggressively pro-choice and even more aggressively anti-life. Recent Popes have done and said things that most RCC on this Board have disagreed with. I've heard many RCC priests teach that our salvation is dependent on our works, leaving faith and God's grace and mercy completely out of the equation.

Protestantism is not simply "a person and their Bible." The Protestantism that I grew up within took seriously church traditions and the teachings of others. There is lots in the Bible that I don't understand or don't understand completely. For those issues, I look to those more learned and with more spiritual wisdom than I possess. But, ultimately, it is the responsibility of each of us to decide what we believe and whom we follow.
Thaddeus73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I don't actually believe this story.

I admit it's hard to believe, but it is a true story. I was shocked when he told me that good works are not to be done, because then I could boast about them...

I have other protestant friends who would never say such a thing, or believe it. And that is the problem with protestantism...everyone has a different belief system based on their personal interpretation of the bible...
Severian the Torturer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KingofHazor said:

There are lots of wacko teachers and leaders in Protestantism, but they don't define Protestantism. There are lots of wacko teachers and leaders in the RC church, as well. I see that Notre Dame has an incoming Board member who is aggressively pro-choice and even more aggressively anti-life. Recent Popes have done and said things that most RCC on this Board have disagreed with. I've heard many RCC priests teach that our salvation is dependent on our works, leaving faith and God's grace and mercy completely out of the equation.

Protestantism is not simply "a person and their Bible." The Protestantism that I grew up within took seriously church traditions and the teachings of others. There is lots in the Bible that I don't understand or don't understand completely. For those issues, I look to those more learned and with more spiritual wisdom than I possess. But, ultimately, it is the responsibility of each of us to decide what we believe and whom we follow.

They cannot have taken church traditions seriously or they would be Orthodox or Catholic. The entire rift of Protestantism was because 1. bad people in the church were doing bad things, 2. Luther's understanding of scripture didn't mesh with the historical witness of the church.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, she does claim to be catholic. I am surprised they are including her. Maybe for "diversity" reasons? Surely they could have found a less polarizing nut job.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.