Ah well. Maybe next time
https://www.ncregister.com/news/progressive-disappointment-at-synod-2024?amp
https://www.ncregister.com/news/progressive-disappointment-at-synod-2024?amp
747Ag said:
Watch out for "unilateral," non-synodal documents though... like Fiducia Suplicans...
one MEEN Ag said:
Remind me again why synods are even valid forms of discussion and decreeance?
clueless.Captain Pablo said:one MEEN Ag said:
Remind me again why synods are even valid forms of discussion and decreeance?
Well according to Pablo Serna, it was to create a unified church. Uniformity in major issues, like women deacons, same-sex relationship relationships, etc
PabloSerna said:
It was never meant to be some sort of document producing effort. Just a listening opportunity of the issues the Church is facing at the parish level. For that alone- it has very much been a success, any other spin is just for clicks.
PabloSerna said:clueless.Captain Pablo said:one MEEN Ag said:
Remind me again why synods are even valid forms of discussion and decreeance?
Well according to Pablo Serna, it was to create a unified church. Uniformity in major issues, like women deacons, same-sex relationship relationships, etc
So when someone says they are lutheran, missouri synod. That's just lutheranism that had a listening opportunity, right? No real differences than the evangelical lutherans, correct?PabloSerna said:
It was never meant to be some sort of document producing effort. Just a listening opportunity of the issues the Church is facing at the parish level. For that alone- it has very much been a success, any other spin is just for clicks.
one MEEN Ag said:So when someone says they are lutheran, missouri synod. That's just lutheranism that had a listening opportunity, right? No real differences than the evangelical lutherans, correct?PabloSerna said:
It was never meant to be some sort of document producing effort. Just a listening opportunity of the issues the Church is facing at the parish level. For that alone- it has very much been a success, any other spin is just for clicks.
Clearly you're playing fast and loose here. If you get what you want, its binding. If you don't, it was just an opportunity to share grievances - keep chipping away until you get what you want.
And that is why I think Synod's shouldn't even be a thing. What about church needs changing or reforming theologically wise? Thats whats at stake here. Someone wants to change church. And a synod is a formal step in the changing process.
showing your ignorance yet again..Captain Pablo said:one MEEN Ag said:So when someone says they are lutheran, missouri synod. That's just lutheranism that had a listening opportunity, right? No real differences than the evangelical lutherans, correct?PabloSerna said:
It was never meant to be some sort of document producing effort. Just a listening opportunity of the issues the Church is facing at the parish level. For that alone- it has very much been a success, any other spin is just for clicks.
Clearly you're playing fast and loose here. If you get what you want, its binding. If you don't, it was just an opportunity to share grievances - keep chipping away until you get what you want.
And that is why I think Synod's shouldn't even be a thing. What about church needs changing or reforming theologically wise? Thats whats at stake here. Someone wants to change church. And a synod is a formal step in the changing process.
Oh, you better believe it's a big deal. Look what happened in Germany.
And you better believe Serna would be dancing in the streets, proclaiming this to be the biggest thing since Vatican II had it gone his way
But it didn't, so, meh, it was never meant to be much in the first place
PabloSerna said:
There's website about the Synod on Synodality. Please check it out for a better understanding. Nothing has changed from day 1. There was some excitement, if you want to call it that, when the German Catholic Church decided to jump the gun and post their own list of issues which were dominated by LGBTQ+ concerns and criticisms of the current pastoral and CCC approach. The Vatican quickly put that down and warned them against that process.
Some one here, in the past, have vilified Father James Martin SJ. He has been reporting quite often. If you follow New Ways Ministries like do- lots of updates. Again- this is a listening session (two years in the running) to bring forth what the faithful are dealing with. The Bishops will vote on a document, that ALREADY includes LGBTQ issues. That will be the ONLY document coming out of this Synod on Synodality. HTH
PabloSerna said:
Research man.. research.
ETA: Link to an AP article from 2023.
"We must be patient, dialogue and accompany these people on the real synodal path," Francis said, referring to his global consultation. The aim, he said, is to "help this more elitist (German) path so that it does not end badly in some way, but so is also integrated into the church."
"Always try to unite,'' the pope added.
PabloSerna said:
The difference is in the title of the event, Synod on Synodality. The RCC has defined that word as, "fraternal collaboration and discernment." HTH
ETA: There will be no groundbreaking shift in doctrine. This was known since 2018. Anything else is spin, spun by talking heads that either know their audience doesn't follow the real developments in Rome or are purposefully seeking to divide the faithful.