There has been a big hubbub about communal/generational blood guilt for the crucifixion of Christ lately due to Holy Week. I understand it is an uncomfortable discussion but it does seem that there is precedent to consider that the Jews may bear some increased generational guilt for the death of Christ.
The Jews consider themselves God's "chosen people" which includes all of their descendants. If "chosen" status can be inherited, why can't guilt?
From the Old Testament, we know that original sin is inherited due to the sin of our first parents; Adam and Eve. Again, if original sin can be inherited, and "chosen" status can be inherited, why not some of the residual stain from the crucifixion.
We know that Christ's sacrifice was necessary to repair the rift between man and God and that Christ bore the weight of all of our sins on the cross. However we also know from the descriptions of Judas in scripture that he was still likely damned for his betrayal regardless of necessity.
Matthew 23:27-29 seems to point towards telling the Jews that their specific woes will continue until they accept Christ "coming in the name of the Lord"
And lastly, Orthodox Judaism maintains that due to their ancient evils, the Jews were expelled from their homeland and to this day do not deserve a homeland since the Babylonian exile. If a denomination of Judaism itself thinks modern Jews are still punished for the sins of their great ancestors, why is it antisemitic to think they bear some residual taint from the crucifixion?
Obviously this does not mean it is okay to harass, or commit violence to individual Jews. I just want to discuss this thought experiment.
The Jews consider themselves God's "chosen people" which includes all of their descendants. If "chosen" status can be inherited, why can't guilt?
From the Old Testament, we know that original sin is inherited due to the sin of our first parents; Adam and Eve. Again, if original sin can be inherited, and "chosen" status can be inherited, why not some of the residual stain from the crucifixion.
We know that Christ's sacrifice was necessary to repair the rift between man and God and that Christ bore the weight of all of our sins on the cross. However we also know from the descriptions of Judas in scripture that he was still likely damned for his betrayal regardless of necessity.
Matthew 23:27-29 seems to point towards telling the Jews that their specific woes will continue until they accept Christ "coming in the name of the Lord"
And lastly, Orthodox Judaism maintains that due to their ancient evils, the Jews were expelled from their homeland and to this day do not deserve a homeland since the Babylonian exile. If a denomination of Judaism itself thinks modern Jews are still punished for the sins of their great ancestors, why is it antisemitic to think they bear some residual taint from the crucifixion?
Obviously this does not mean it is okay to harass, or commit violence to individual Jews. I just want to discuss this thought experiment.