Russia cracks down on the biggest enemy facing Civilization

11,822 Views | 177 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by Ferg
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Intermission. Waiting for responses.

The truth of God is like a prism held for the sunshine of God's Holy Scriptures. In relationship, you turn the prism and see the attributes of who God is each time it turns.
Then you find out that everything is interwoven that's both in the scriptures and under the sun.

"In the total expanse of human life there is not a single square inch of which the Christ, who alone is sovereign, does not declare, 'That is mine!'."

Abraham Kuyper former Prine Minister of the Netherlands. Tied to the Dutch Reformed …Also created the Free University of Amsterdam.

We tenaciously pray, "Thy Kingdom Come, Thy Will Be Done, On Earth As It Is In Heaven."

Or else why should we pray it if we don't want that to happen?

kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:

kurt vonnegut said:

"Christians have been persecuted" and "Christians have done the persecuting" are not mutually exclusive statements, correct?
That's an in-house discussion that we've overcome through the years of dialogue with different Christian Traditions.

I don't know what this means. My best guess is that it is a hand waving away of past Christian transgressions because 'now we've fixed it, no more problems, nothing to see here.'
Quote:

Furthermore, by what standard are you going to use in order to say what Christians experienced was wrong or correct?
In a moral sense, I'm not going to say Christians are wrong or correct. I think I'd best describe myself as a moral relativist and there is no objective standard.

kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:

The godless French Revolution that my opponents worship…


While it is impossible to give a precise number of casualties for the French Revolution due to record keeping methods used at the time, the current estimate is somewhere between 30,000-40,000 people, at least. This is most likely a conservative estimate. From 1789 until 1799, and especially during the Reign of Terror (1793-1794), execution rates increased exponentially, and as many were arrested as killed, some never to be seen again. If you include clergy, aristocrats, wealthy nobles, and soldiers, the number is probably somewhere closer to 100,000 people.

That's 100,000 French Catholics slaughtered, probably more, by the reason alone tenant of your pseudo-religion.

https://homework.study.com/explanation/how-many-people-died-in-the-french-revolution.html

Here's your godless socialist Nazis:

National Socialist German Workers' Party

"The total number of noncombatants killed by the Germansabout 11 millionis roughly what we had thought. "

And that's just the noncombatants. Now add Allie casualties lost to the godless Nazi socialists and you will see tens of millions.

https://war-history.fandom.com/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

Want to do Stalin and Mao next?

Now you go before I add Stalin and Mao.

You should have stated with Stalin and Mao - those are your better arguments. I don't see much to be gained in a debate about which philosophy has killed more people.

Partly because its way too easy to for me to disassociate my beliefs from Mao just as it is way too easy for you to disassociate yourself from the likes of Leopold II. And also because actors like Hitler will be rejected by both sides. He was a Catholic, leading an almost completely Catholic country, and had Papal endorsements. You cannot simply state that the Nazis were godless. They very much thought themselves to be on the Christian God's side. If you get to 'no true scotsman' them off your ledger, then I get to do the same.

But I think all of this misses a bigger point. And I think that bigger point is that humans have done horrible things - and neither secularists nor Christians are an exception. We should both condemn the consequences of 80 million dead Chinese from a Marxist leader. And we should also condemn a roughly equal number of deaths in India from Christian colonialization and exploitation. The argument that Christianity has earned some right to moral authority today because they slaughtered slightly less millions of people is an argument that does not hold any water to me.


If you are still interested in scorecards, I think you have to account for Christian destructions of close to 100 million natives in the Americas - which is a complicated task given how much of that was from spread of disease. And you have to account for maybe 50 million in the Atlantic Slave Trade. And maybe over another 100 million in India. Tens of millions more during the 1800s and 1900s European colonization of Africa. SE Asia and Pacific Islander colonization, Inquisition, Crusades, 30 Years War, German Peasant's War, the KKK, Celtic wars. . . Even if your tally shows that Christianity has killed fewer than secular sources, I expect we both would be disgusted with whatever the true numbers are.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kurt vonnegut said:

TheGreatEscape said:

The godless French Revolution that my opponents worship…


While it is impossible to give a precise number of casualties for the French Revolution due to record keeping methods used at the time, the current estimate is somewhere between 30,000-40,000 people, at least. This is most likely a conservative estimate. From 1789 until 1799, and especially during the Reign of Terror (1793-1794), execution rates increased exponentially, and as many were arrested as killed, some never to be seen again. If you include clergy, aristocrats, wealthy nobles, and soldiers, the number is probably somewhere closer to 100,000 people.

That's 100,000 French Catholics slaughtered, probably more, by the reason alone tenant of your pseudo-religion.

https://homework.study.com/explanation/how-many-people-died-in-the-french-revolution.html

Here's your godless socialist Nazis:

National Socialist German Workers' Party

"The total number of noncombatants killed by the Germansabout 11 millionis roughly what we had thought. "

And that's just the noncombatants. Now add Allie casualties lost to the godless Nazi socialists and you will see tens of millions.

https://war-history.fandom.com/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

Want to do Stalin and Mao next?

Now you go before I add Stalin and Mao.

You should have stated with Stalin and Mao - those are your better arguments. I don't see much to be gained in a debate about which philosophy has killed more people.

Partly because its way too easy to for me to disassociate my beliefs from Mao just as it is way too easy for you to disassociate yourself from the likes of Leopold II. And also because actors like Hitler will be rejected by both sides. He was a Catholic, leading an almost completely Catholic country, and had Papal endorsements. You cannot simply state that the Nazis were godless. They very much thought themselves to be on the Christian God's side. If you get to 'no true scotsman' them off your ledger, then I get to do the same.

But I think all of this misses a bigger point. And I think that bigger point is that humans have done horrible things - and neither secularists nor Christians are an exception. We should both condemn the consequences of 80 million dead Chinese from a Marxist leader. And we should also condemn a roughly equal number of deaths in India from Christian colonialization and exploitation. The argument that Christianity has earned some right to moral authority today because they slaughtered slightly less millions of people is an argument that does not hold any water to me.


If you are still interested in scorecards, I think you have to account for Christian destructions of close to 100 million natives in the Americas - which is a complicated task given how much of that was from spread of disease. And you have to account for maybe 50 million in the Atlantic Slave Trade. And maybe over another 100 million in India. Tens of millions more during the 1800s and 1900s European colonization of Africa. SE Asia and Pacific Islander colonization, Inquisition, Crusades, 30 Years War, German Peasant's War, the KKK, Celtic wars. . . Even if your tally shows that Christianity has killed fewer than secular sources, I expect we both would be disgusted with whatever the true numbers are.


He was baptized Catholic, but Hitler wasn't a Catholic.

"If we had to describe his religious views in a single phrase, we could say that he was a pseudo-scientific evolutionary pantheist."

"Hitler's understanding of Christ was bizarre. According to him, Jesus was not a Jew. Weikart notes, "In April 1921, he told a crowd in Rosenheim that he could not imagine Christ as anything other than blond-haired and blue-eyed, making clear that he considered Jesus an Aryan. In an interview with a journalist in November 1922, he actually claimed Jesus was Germanic.""

"Although Hitler was prepared to see Jesus as having been martyred because of his opposition to Jewish practices, he did not believe in the Resurrection. According to Hitler's confidant Otto Wagener, Hitler stated that "Christ's body was removed from the tomb to keep it from being an object of veneration and a tangible relic of the great new founder of a religion."

The resurrection is everything to being a Christian. To deny the resurrection is to make the Gospel as of no effect
(I.e. declares Saint Paul in 1 Corinthians 15, emphatically).

If you don't hold to one of the three historic creeds of the church, then you objectively are not a Christian.

The full discussion on Hitler's ideologue is found here.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/what-was-hitlers-religion
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure. Though you may object to being as depraved and be better kept together by common grace, there is more in common with Hitler's beliefs with the secularists than there ever was and ever shall be with Christians. For the Christian accepts the deity of Christ. But not the Hitler commonalities that you all share with him.

So what is your worldview? Is there a soul? What authority will you claim for its existence?

Is there an afterlife? If you believe there is, than on what grounds do you support the claim?

Do you believe in the resurrection or just some of the Christian ethic that suits you?

Do you know of the significance of why Jesus had to be a Jew in order to be the promised Messiah of the line of King David?

Do you believe in the transcendent or spiritual realm?

If so, on what authority do you stand that there is a transcendence from the physical realm?

And if you are going to advocate for various positions, then you must both support your claims and evidences to the court.

And you and Sapper have failed miserably at that time and time again.
craigernaught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure.

There's no point engaging with this type of nonsense.

I suspect this is all some elaborate troll. At the very least, what's written isn't any sort of response to anyone else, just a bunch of jumbled random thoughts. Let it be.
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:



He was baptized Catholic, but Hitler wasn't a Catholic.

Hitler is not single handedly responsible for the Holocaust.
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
craigernaught said:

Quote:

Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure.

There's no point engaging with this type of nonsense.

I suspect this is all some elaborate troll. At the very least, what's written isn't any sort of response to anyone else, just a bunch of jumbled random thoughts. Let it be.

Thanks, I needed this. I'll let it go!
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
May the court also recognize that the godless counselors have yet to answer the question of whether Christianity is good for the world.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kurt vonnegut said:

TheGreatEscape said:



He was baptized Catholic, but Hitler wasn't a Catholic.

Hitler is not single handedly responsible for the Holocaust.


Yeah…ask his boy Himler who followed rigorously the traditions and rituals of the Arian Occult.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
craigernaught said:

Quote:

Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure.

There's no point engaging with this type of nonsense.

I suspect this is all some elaborate troll. At the very least, what's written isn't any sort of response to anyone else, just a bunch of jumbled random thoughts. Let it be.


So maybe, since you are so wise, flatter me with your definition of the laws of logic.
I mean, if everything of what I'm stating is nonsense, then prove to the court that you have epistemological grounds to accompany your definition of the laws of logic.

Or do you not believe in the laws of logic?

Or have your arguments been so thus destroyed that you all
are bowing out?
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did the words "pseudo-scientific evolutionary pantheist" strike a nerve so that you refused to answer my questions to see if your beliefs matched up or how much they do?
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:

Did the words "pseudo-scientific evolutionary pantheist" strike a nerve so that you refused to answer my questions to see if your beliefs matched up or how much they do?

No, its more that your accusations and questions ignore what I've said to this point. And the position that secular epistemology can all be discarded on the basis that it does not appeal to a magic man in the sky is getting tired.

If you want to win a debate, then fine you win - I bow out. If you want to share ideas and know what I believe and why, start a new thread with that intention - this conversation has moved well beyond the question of whether LGBTQ persons should have freedom of speech or not.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Christians rest our case until these questions are answered.

I almost forgot. May the court recognize that moral groundings in a worldview of materialism have gone unanswered.

Yet, they are supposedly with a better grounding of knowledge, but can't answer simple questions, nor substantiate their claims against adding to the Texas Constitution that the people of Texas believe in both the divine and the afterlife.
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kurt vonnegut said:

TheGreatEscape said:

Did the words "pseudo-scientific evolutionary pantheist" strike a nerve so that you refused to answer my questions to see if your beliefs matched up or how much they do?

No, its more that your accusations and questions ignore what I've said to this point. And the position that secular epistemology can all be discarded on the basis that it does not appeal to a magic man in the sky is getting tired.

If you want to win a debate, then fine you win - I bow out. If you want to share ideas and know what I believe and why, start a new thread with that intention - this conversation has moved well beyond the question of whether LGBTQ persons should have freedom of speech or not.


Just war theory. You all attacked the Christian basis for morality and the right of popular sovereignty for Christians to rule.

And the court discovered that you all absolutely have no basis for morality without Judeo-Christianity.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And I motion that the State of Texas only grants religious liberties to those organized in such a way that members may join to receive tax exemption.

"For a religious organization to receive a state tax exemption, it must be an organized, established group of people regularly meeting at a designated location to hold religious worship services. Religious groups do not need a federal tax exemption to qualify for Texas state tax exemptions.."

If one is outside of a tax exempt community, then one is not of religion, nor can be defined as such to receive the full general equity of the law in order to receive full religious liberty protections.
craigernaught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
kurt vonnegut said:

craigernaught said:

Quote:

Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure.

There's no point engaging with this type of nonsense.

I suspect this is all some elaborate troll. At the very least, what's written isn't any sort of response to anyone else, just a bunch of jumbled random thoughts. Let it be.

Thanks, I needed this. I'll let it go!

I have enjoyed reading your responses here. And I've also enjoyed the rest of the thread like it's a YouTube video of car crashes.

This board certainly attracts some interesting characters.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And I just wanted to add that we are the best uniter of the races to be in true holy brotherhood and sisterhood.

For it is written:

"Elect from every nation, tribe, and language…"
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
craigernaught said:

kurt vonnegut said:

craigernaught said:

Quote:

Kurt,

We may see a lot of similarities with you and Hitler's believe structure.

There's no point engaging with this type of nonsense.

I suspect this is all some elaborate troll. At the very least, what's written isn't any sort of response to anyone else, just a bunch of jumbled random thoughts. Let it be.

Thanks, I needed this. I'll let it go!

I have enjoyed reading your responses here. And I've also enjoyed the rest of the thread like it's a YouTube video of car crashes.

This board certainly attracts some interesting characters.


Prayers sent for the moralists and their this, that, and the other thing.

"For the image of God is defaced, but no erased."

John Calvin

Soli Deo Gloria
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the secularists wants to attack the foundation of Judeo-Christianity morality in life, government, and politics; will just simply show them that they have no foundation in and of themselves at all.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All are at the same level underneath the foot of the cross.

I'll keep y'all in my prayers.
Aggrad08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:

If the secularists wants to attack the foundation of Judeo-Christianity morality in life, government, and politics; will just simply show them that they have no foundation in and of themselves at all.


Except this is moronic Sunday school argumentation not thoughtful philosophy. We have done the objective morality threads many times before and you and yours always end up with your pants around your ankles. Use the search functions and refer to any number of those threads and see if you can think of an argument that's new.

You have no objective morality to offer. No one does. And you aren't actually addressing the meat of the argument in any post in response to you and are getting progressively more combative
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's unfair. I wasn't involved in those threads.
Let's do this here and now. You may go first.

Substantiate your claims, por favor?

Which one of the Ten Commandments did God mess up?
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 Corinthians 11:6

"But though I be rude in speech, yet not in knowledge; but we have been throughly made manifest among you in all things."

St. Paul
Aggrad08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
no go back and read, and learn. I think many of the people I addressed those issues with were better informed, so you can see why even a better form of your argument fails.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is "legal dope"?

Just wondering for a friend.

TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

What is "legal dope"?

Just wondering for a friend.




Part of the story is found in "background of the board" thread.
TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggrad08 said:

no go back and read, and learn. I think many of the people I addressed those issues with were better informed, so you can see why even a better form of your argument fails.



No thanks. I'll stay right here where we've been dealing with the presuppositions and foundations of knowing what is real, beautiful, and true. I'm not going to start over with everyone on the board. I'd have to almost respond to everyone.

But you're enlightened by much more academic types from that thread . Why don't you answer my simpleton question?

Again, what is one of the Ten Commandments that God messed up?

Show me you can respond and substantiate your claim.

TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggrad08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheGreatEscape said:

Aggrad08 said:

no go back and read, and learn. I think many of the people I addressed those issues with were better informed, so you can see why even a better form of your argument fails.


Again, what is one of the Ten Commandments that God messed up?

Show me you can respond and substantiate your claim.


This just demonstrates you don't understand the issue at heart. The question you ask is immaterial to the existence of objective morality. It's like I'm saying 2+2=4 and you are saying prove the sky isn't purple.

If you want an answer to your immaterial question, I'd say most of the ten commandments particularly the later half are fine enough. And why just the ten commandments? There are 613 or so, most of which I doubt you obey.

But I did always think killing people for disobeying the sabbath was a bit daft and the lord's name in vain always seemed pretty low priority compared to saying "don't rape" or "don't enslave people" or something instead.

TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheGreatEscape said:

Aggrad08 said:

no go back and read, and learn. I think many of the people I addressed those issues with were better informed, so you can see why even a better form of your argument fails.



No thanks. I'll stay right here where we've been dealing with the presuppositions and foundations of knowing what is real, beautiful, and true. I'm not going to start over with everyone on the board. I'd have to almost respond to everyone.

But you're enlightened by much more academic types from that thread . Why don't you answer my simpleton question?

Again, what is one of the Ten Commandments that God messed up?

Show me you can respond and substantiate your claim.


TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So I happen to be a Christian. You already know this.

Are you a philosophical materialist?

Do you have some kind of spine? Or are you another jellyfish?
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

What is "legal dope"?
Just wondering for a friend.



Delta 8?9?

Tell your friend the illegal stuff is better.

TheGreatEscape
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kurt vonnegut said:

PabloSerna said:

What is "legal dope"?
Just wondering for a friend.



Delta 8?9?

Tell your friend the illegal stuff is better.




Haha. No sir. It was something else and was not taken properly under the directions of the doctor. Background of the Board thread.

Sorry. I'm a little dyslexic.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.