Quote:
You are correct that the miraculous gifts of the Spirit, including prophecy, were rare in the OT, but not completely unknown as the seem to be today. Why are they completely unknown today?
Point of distinction here. Prophecy is done, because the prophets all foretold Christ. There are no new prophets, in the proper sense (or OT sense). That being said, there are many cases of saints with clear sight and prophetic visions and dreams, even today. They are not completely unknown.
Quote:
The miraculous gifts of the Spirit were not rare in the NT, but were common, so common that the apostles spent a fair amount of space in their letters discussing how they were to be exercised. Again, why are those miraculous gifts unknown today?
Again, I think you're looking at the gifts of the Spirit and more or less saying, "yeah, I'm not impressed".
I think that to some extent the manifestation of the Holy Spirit has guided the Church from individual prophetic homilies and teachings to divine theology. There is no need, for example, for prophetic inspiration against Arianism. St Gregory the Theologian had divine or prophetic insight into the nature of the godhead and spoke about it debating with the heretics in his theological orations. In the early Church, people would stand and speak "according to their strength" as St Justin says. This was a sort of organic worship, but these inspired prayers and teachings
became the various families of liturgies that were later edited or compiled into our two modern forms of the Divine Liturgy. The form of the Liturgy was essentially fixed less than 50 years after the end of the persecution of the Church in the Roman empire. In other words, we move from grace to grace, but we do so always by the inspiration of the Spirit.
Every Liturgy is a direct and immediate manifestation of the Spirit, a receipt of grace
par excellence, it is "sanctified by the word of God and prayer" and every person who partakes becomes a living icon of Christ, to the extent that they can receive it.
Quote:
Paul uses the presence of the Holy Spirit as an absolute test of being a Christian in vs. 9. In v. 16 he describes how the Spirit bears witness with our spirit. Surely that is more than a mere ephemeral feeling or unity on doctrine? In v. 26 he describes how the Spirit "helps us in our weakness." Why, then, do so many Christians struggle with weaknesses that defeat them that they would gladly eradicate? Weaknesses such as alcoholism, lust, addiction, lack of love, and so forth? Paul clearly is not simply referencing the unity of the Church, which may well be a by-product of the Spirit, but much, much more than that.
I belong to Christ, and indeed we sing at every baptism, and on certain feast days, as many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ!
You're chopping and cutting and missing the whole point of verse 16! Work backwards to follow the logic. The Spirit bears witness, yes - it bears witness to our sonship, because it is by the Spirit that we dare to call upon God as Father, and those who are sons are led by the Spirit, and those who are led by the Spirit put to death the deeds of the body with the Spirit, and therefore they will live. Working forward from v16, we see that the Spirit bears witness that we are children, and heirs - and evidence of this is that we are heirs to both Christ's life and death. There's an inside-out paradox relationship here, centering on the Spirit bearing witness to us as children of God - and the evidence is suffering to life, by death to the self.
As for V26, he says before - all creation groans awaiting to be set free in the coming glory, and we groan in this expectation and struggle
even though we have the firstfruits of the Spirit! He says, we hope for what we do not see, and in this struggle and travail and hope, "awaiting divine adoption as sons" the Spirit helps us. It is not magic.
The evidence of the Spirit, then, is not a magic cure all for sin but that saints may exist at all - or that people may even aspire to it! The struggle for righteousness, the hunger and thirsting, is evidence of the Spirit. But at the same time, the Spirit can be outraged (Hebrews 10:29). It can be quenched (1 Thessalonians 5:19). It can be grieved (Ephesians 4:30). We are God's fellow-workers (1 Corinthians 3:9) but even servants can work uselessly and foolishly (Luke 17:7-10).
Quote:
The spiritual gifts are listed in 1 Corinthians 12, and are described as "manifestations" of the Spirit. Doesn't that mean that they are something more than mere natural abilities? Doesn't it mean that Christians with those gifts should be distinguishable from non-Christians with those abilities? Shouldn't those gifts somehow manifest something of the supernatural about them?
St Paul begins the passage on gifts with the explanation that even the ability to say "Jesus is Lord" is the gift of the Spirit.
You don't think that a Christian with the gift of wisdom, or knowledge, or faith is immediately and utterly distinct from non-Christians? You're looking past the amazing promises - those foretold in the OT - of the Spirit and wanting only miraculous signs. Isaiah 11 talks about the seven gifts of the Spirit: Wisdom, Understanding or Discernment, Counsel, Fortitude, Knowledge, Piety, and Fear of God. You skip right over those, and I don't know why.
St Paul concludes that passage by saying that not everyone will have certain gifts, but desire them - and then moves on to the more surpassing way, which is Love, as if to say - forget all of this, and remember that the only thing that matters is Love. "If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing."
All of these things that are the workings of the Spirit in this present age are said to end; but not Love. So perhaps we should actually say - the workings of the Church, the gifts of the Spirit are for the Church and to its members in particular. The individuals of the Church are for the edification of the Church (including administration, for example, which I suppose isn't particularly miraculous but a gift nonetheless). But the purpose of these gifts is to enable, support, lead people into truth and knowledge of God which results in and is manifested by love. Without love a person cannot know God; Christ Himself said this is the witness of the Church (John 13:35) and this is reiterated over and over (1 Peter 1:8; 1 John practically the whole letter).
Quote:
Paul reassures the Galatians in 5:5 that God "has given us the Spirit as a guarantee." What kind of guarantee is it if it's not readily apparent?
Paul also reassures the Galatians in 3:5 that God "supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you". Where are those miracles today that evidence the presence of the Holy Spirit? It does not appear to have been that rare an event at the time of the writing of Galatians.
Gal 5:5 must be a misquote? "For through the Spirit, by faith, we eagerly await the hope of righteousness." I read that as saying, the Spirit enables our faith which gives us hope of righteousness, because, as he continues, the only thing that matters in Christ Jesus is faith working through love.
I don't know that I'd call chapter 3 reassurance. It is (forgive the phrase) a royal ass chewing. He says they're foolish, and having begun in the Spirit now start going to the flesh. After his chewing, and explaining to them their foolishness his reassures them that they have the Spirit, yes, in Chapter 5. But how? Again, like his letter to the Romans, by saying that walking by the Spirit puts to death the flesh, as they are in opposition. And he enumerates the works of the flesh, and says those who indulge in the flesh will not inherit the kingdom. On the other hand, those who live by the Spirit walk by the Spirit, and show that through love (first and foremost, eh?), joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.
Likewise with 1 John 3. The entire chapter is about love. We know that we have passed from death to life because we love one another, and a clean conscience allows us to approach God with confidence (as Father, this echoes Romans 8 and 1 Corinthians 13 perfectly). And,
if we keep His commandments, He remains in us, and again the evidence of this is His Spirit. This is the same in chapter 4. In fact, verse 13 is really saying that our testimony and confession is evidence of the Spirit, along with love (see v6, and also identical to 1 Cor 12).
You are looking for one kind of evidence, but ignoring another. And also, I think, maybe not seeing the reason you do not see the evidence you want.
St Paul says the spirit works in him mightily. I have experienced this in my life, and I am no one. Again, the question I have, is if you do not see the Spirit working in your church the way it says over and over again in the NT that it
does - in love, in righteous living, in gentleness, meekness, people hungering and thirsting after God, in faith... why do you expect to see it working miracles?
This is what I mean by setting the bar too high, or in the wrong place. People have trouble with basic teaching, with spiritual milk, and you're asking why there's no meat.
Again, I quote St Paul - "Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you - unless indeed you fail the test? But I trust that you will realize that we ourselves do not fail the test." The Church exists to make saints, not work miracles. Go to the Church where you see evidence of the Church - which is led by the Spirit - making saints. That's what the fathers wrote about in those passages. The Spirit leading to knowledge and righteousness.
I don't mean this as a criticism. You're asking the question. What conclusion do you draw?