There is not enough water in the atmosphere to flood the world. It's just a fairy tale.
MidTnAg said:
There is not enough water in the atmosphere to flood the world. It's just a fairy tale.
My view is no different than what I posted above. People gather with this passage that the Messiah will come back like a thief (surprise), yet 1 Thessalonians 5 says "But you, brothers and sisters, are not in the dark, so that the Day might overtake you like a thief."Quote:
What is your view/opinion on Matthew 24:36-44?
Matthew 24:36-44 English Standard Version (ESV)
No One Knows That Day and Hour
36 "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. 37 For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. 41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left. 42 Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. 43 But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.
In Noah's time, the people were so oblivious to the coming flood; I'm sure some of them had been warned. yet they were incredibly lax and nonchalant about it; to the point, they didn't get on the ark and perished in the flood. I'm sure they were surprised when the rain didn't let up.
Same with Christ's coming. The believers will be in the new "ark." Everyone else, sad to say, will be caught in the new "flood."
Wait, what? The water cycle didn't exist before Noah? How did rivers get their source?Quote:
What I find most interesting is Christ referenced Noah and the great flood. How can a Christian question the flood when our savior talked about it?
The majority of the flood water came up from the earth, it had never rained before Noah's time.
so that was an awakening in itself.
Quote:
Wait, what? The water cycle didn't exist before Noah? How did rivers get their source?
Well stated. I used to lean towards the Canopy Theory (now not so sure, but find it interesting nonetheless and clearly there are ecological differences pre-flood vs. post-flood). One doesn't need a deep understanding of hydrology to realize groundwater and aquifers recharge lakes, rivers, wetlands, and even the oceans far greater than precipitation.FriscoTxAggie said:Quote:
Wait, what? The water cycle didn't exist before Noah? How did rivers get their source?
My best guess is when God created the heavens and earth, He did so with the oceans & rivers full of water. Scientists have also discovered large bodies of water deep within the earth. I see more proof that there was a Great Flood about 4400 years ago versus no flood at all.
According to a controversial theory proposed by two Columbia University scientists, they believe that the now-salty Black Sea was once an isolated freshwater lake surrounded by farmland, until it was flooded by an enormous wall of water from the rising Mediterranean Sea. The force of the water was two hundred times that of Niagara Falls, sweeping away everything in its path.
Fascinated by the idea, Ballard and his team decided to investigate.
"We went in there to look for the flood," he said. "Not just a slow moving, advancing rise of sea level, but a really big flood that then stayed... The land that went under stayed under."
Four hundred feet below the surface, they unearthed an ancient shoreline, proof to Ballard that a catastrophic event did happen in the Black Sea. By carbon dating shells found along the shoreline, Ballard said he believes they have established a timeline for that catastrophic event, which he estimates happened around 5,000 BC. Some experts believe this was around the time when Noah's flood could have occurred.
Not to derail this into another flood/no-flood thread because there are more than enough of them here, but I can't let this stand.FriscoTxAggie said:Quote:
Wait, what? The water cycle didn't exist before Noah? How did rivers get their source?
My best guess is when God created the heavens and earth, He did so with the oceans & rivers full of water. Scientists have also discovered large bodies of water deep within the earth. I see more proof that there was a Great Flood about 4400 years ago versus no flood at all.
According to a controversial theory proposed by two Columbia University scientists, they believe that the now-salty Black Sea was once an isolated freshwater lake surrounded by farmland, until it was flooded by an enormous wall of water from the rising Mediterranean Sea. The force of the water was two hundred times that of Niagara Falls, sweeping away everything in its path.
Fascinated by the idea, Ballard and his team decided to investigate.
"We went in there to look for the flood," he said. "Not just a slow moving, advancing rise of sea level, but a really big flood that then stayed... The land that went under stayed under."
Four hundred feet below the surface, they unearthed an ancient shoreline, proof to Ballard that a catastrophic event did happen in the Black Sea. By carbon dating shells found along the shoreline, Ballard said he believes they have established a timeline for that catastrophic event, which he estimates happened around 5,000 BC. Some experts believe this was around the time when Noah's flood could have occurred.
Quote:
Four years ago, Columbia University marine geologists William B.F. Ryan and Walter C. Pitman 3rd inspired a wave of archaeological and other scientific interest in the Black Sea region with geologic and climate evidence that a catastrophic flood 7,600 years ago destroyed an ancient civilization that played a pivotal role in the spread of early farming into Europe and much of Asia.
Also see: https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/noahs-not-so-big-floodQuote:
Drs. Ryan and Pitman argued their provocative theory in a 1999 book, "Noah's Flood: The New Scientific Discoveries About the Event That Changed History" (Simon & Schuster). Ryan and Pitman theorized that the sealed Bosporus strait, which acted as a dam between the Mediterranean and Black seas, broke open when climatic warming at the close of the last glacial period caused icecaps to melt, raising the global sea level.
Quote:
When Earth's last ice age waned, water frozen into vast ice sheets melted and returned to the ocean, elevating sea levels. About 9,400 years ago, Mediterranean waters rose above the dam, reconnecting the two seas. They surged over the now submerged Bosphorus Sill with the force of 200 Niagara Falls, according to a controversial theory proposed in 1997 by Columbia University marine geologists Bill Ryan and Walter Pitman.
Quote:
Now, a new study in the January 2009 issue of Quaternary Science Reviews suggests that if the flood occurred at all, it was much smallerhardly of biblical proportions. Liviu Giosan of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and Florin Filip and Stefan Constantinescu of the University of Bucharest found evidence that Black Lake/Sea water levels rose only 5 to 10 meters around 9,400 years ago, not 50 to 60 meters as Ryan and his colleagues proposed. The flood would have drowned only about 2,000 square kilometers of land (about half of Rhode Island), rather than 70,000 square kilometers (more than the entire state of West Virginia).
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you did not intentionally misstate the Columbia University findings to help prove your belief.Quote:
Combining the more precise dating technique with a more reliable sea-level marker, the researchers could be confident and conclude that the "Black Lake" water level at the time of the flood was around 30not 80meters lower than present, and the flood raised the level by only 5 to 10not 50 to 60meters.
A more modest flood "still could have put an area of 2,000 square kilometers of prime agricultural land in the Danube delta under water, which has important implications for the archaeology and anthropology of Europe," Giosan said. But was it enough to prompt an ark?