*** THE ODYSSEY *** (Christopher Nolan)

361,935 Views | 4530 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by HummingbirdSaltalamacchia
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinAg2K said:

TCTTS said:




Is it also the highest grossing liberal/woke film of all time?


A movie about conservation and the pillaging of a native population of blue haired people against the imperialist capitalist machine already tops the list.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The new Spider-Man is a better movie.

Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

The new Spider-Man is a better movie.



It's definitely more entertaining.
Scotts Tot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finally saw it! I'm sure a lot of this is reiterating points already made in the thread but here goes…

- Really fun to watch in theaters. I doubt I'll ever watch this again because so much of the appeal is the visuals and grand scale.

- I'm sure the dialogue has been thoroughly discussed, but I thought it was horrible. It felt like one American colloquialism after another, and created a real cognitive dissonance against the setting of a Greek classic set in antiquity. The reception of this film has been strong enough that clearly the dialogue didn't ruin it for most people, but I thought it really detracted overall.

- Acting was mixed. As much has been made of the multicultural casting, I thought the weakest performance overall was from Tom Holland. He felt like a normal American kid dressed up in a Greek costume saying his lines as if he were hanging out with buddies. Also the Telemachus character was kind of puny and impotent, and never really develops all that much.

- The buildup and execution of the final scene with the suitors was awesome. That scene was the culmination of over 2.5 hours of buildup, and it didn't disappoint.

Overall it was a fun watch in the theater, if not at least a half hour too long.
veryfuller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
Quote:

Also the Telemachus character was kind of puny and impotent, and never really develops all that much.

Thats the character tho, not the acting. The movie doesn't underline it, but the character really starts to change after Menelaus tells him to man up, and then even more when Odysseus comes back and starts to work with him to overthrow the suitors. He gets smarter as the film moves along. Its obviously not the main arc of the movie and perhaps it could have been developed more, but it stood out to me more the 2nd time I saw it. Holland was just fine to me on first watch, but I appreciated the performance more the 2nd time I watched it. He probably has one of the hardest roles to play. It could easily slip into annoying, but I think he mostly avoids that.
Scotts Tot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
veryfuller said:

Quote:

Also the Telemachus character was kind of puny and impotent, and never really develops all that much.

Thats the character tho, not the acting. The movie doesn't underline it, but the character really starts to change after Menelaus tells him to man up, and then even more when Odysseus comes back and starts to work with him to overthrow the suitors. He gets smarter as the film moves along. It's obviously not the main arc of the movie and perhaps it could have been developed more, but it stood out to me more the 2nd time I saw it. Holland was just fine to me on first watch, but I appreciated the performance more the 2nd time I watched it. He probably has one of the hardest roles to play. It could easily slip into annoying, but I think he mostly avoids that.

Well you can tell me if wrong, but in Homer I remembered him returning from Sparta as a far more formidable character. My indictment of his portrayal in the film relates more to the latter portion of the narrative. I expected him to factor more strongly in overthrowing the suitors.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinAg2K said:

TCTTS said:




Is it also the highest grossing liberal/woke film of all time?

Nope, Avatar. Hippies ruining legit government authorized big-business project with terrorism and Native American Pandoran protests.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Couple weeks removed from seeing it...I think it's criminal it's going to do those kinds of numbers. Such a letdown.
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a bad thing that people want to go out and see things for themselves?

Rather than relying on 130 pages of internet fodder?

Nope- don't think that's a bad thing.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zgolfz85 said:

Couple weeks removed from seeing it...I think it's criminal it's going to do those kinds of numbers. Such a letdown.


This makes no sense. You, yourself, contributed to that number.
ATM9000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scotts Tot said:


- Acting was mixed. As much has been made of the multicultural casting, I thought the weakest performance overall was from Tom Holland. He felt like a normal American kid dressed up in a Greek costume saying his lines as if he were hanging out with buddies.


Kinda funny critique considering Tom Holland is English. But also not wrong.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chipotlemonger said:

zgolfz85 said:

Couple weeks removed from seeing it...I think it's criminal it's going to do those kinds of numbers. Such a letdown.


This makes no sense. You, yourself, contributed to that number.

and for me, I wish I'd have waited for streaming, rather than spend $50 to go see it. I like when movies do well, as long as they're justifiably doing well. This isn't that. I gave it a 7/10 (generously) upon leaving the theater, but having sat on it for a couple of weeks and being asked what I thought of it by friends and family, I honestly couldn't really detail anything I enjoyed about it...aside from the cheap thrills like some of the visuals and sound, etc. To me, it was like we paired big budget box office quality sound and visuals with made for tv level writing, acting and casting. Revised score for me....5.5/10, honestly.
veryfuller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG

via GIPHY

Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soooo, it's "criminal" to live in a world where people don't leave their houses to do fun things, and make their own opinions?

Yeah, sure, OK.

Not a world I want to live in.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CharleyKerfeld said:



zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rigs said:

Soooo, it's "criminal" to live in a world where people don't leave their houses to do fun things, and make their own opinions?

Yeah, sure, OK.

Not a world I want to live in.


Not sure what my clear and obvious exaggeration of the term "criminal" has to do with abolishing freedom, but ok. wtf
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's ok guys, this whole thread has just taught a lot of us which posters to tune into or ignore in terms of viewing recommendations. Feel free to keep posting circle jerk praise of this stinker of a film though.
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh for sure.

And which side of that fence do you think you fall?

(Prob not the one you think.)
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rigs said:

Oh for sure.

And which side of that fence do you think you fall?

(Prob not the one you think.)


I'm not even going to respond to your nonsense. How you somehow extrapolated from my joking comment about it being criminal for this movie to do $1.5B in sales to me being a freedom hating hyper liberal is beyond me. Like wtf are you talking about
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

a freedom hating hyper liberal
Did I call you that in any way?

Nope.

Did I say people should be able to spend their money to try to go have fun however they want to?

Yep.
tomtomdrumdrum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guys don't let a dumb argument bury this golden irony.
Quote:

this whole thread has just taught a lot of us which posters to tune into or ignore in terms of viewing recommendations
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The way you chose to to turn a response to your own comment, about who has good movie opinions or not, into someone being "hyper liberal or not", when no one ever mentioned politics…truly unhinged.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rigs said:

The way you chose to to turn a response to your own comment, about who has good movie opinions or not, into someone being "hyper liberal or not", when no one ever mentioned politics…truly unhinged.


Stfu man. You quoted this to my clearly hyperbolic comment:

"Soooo, it's "criminal" to live in a world where people don't leave their houses to do fun things, and make their own opinions?

Yeah, sure, OK.

Not a world I want to live in."

How should I have interpreted that? What did my comment about this movie being undeserving of hitting record numbers have to do with people not being allowed to leave their houses to do fun things and have opinions? It was a dumb thing to reply and you can get all the typical CN circle jerk stars from the same handful of posters as usual, but it doesn't make your comment relevant or sensible.
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How should you have interpreted it?

That people should be allowed to go do what they want with their money. And there's no such thing as "deserving" at the box office.

And it's good that people are leaving their houses.

How else would you have interpreted it?

Unless you're politics obsessed, not in any way that it means you are "a hyper liberal".

Unhinged.
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zgolfz85 said:

Rigs said:

The way you chose to to turn a response to your own comment, about who has good movie opinions or not, into someone being "hyper liberal or not", when no one ever mentioned politics…truly unhinged.


Stfu man. You quoted this to my clearly hyperbolic comment:

"Soooo, it's "criminal" to live in a world where people don't leave their houses to do fun things, and make their own opinions?

Yeah, sure, OK.

Not a world I want to live in."

How should I have interpreted that? What did my comment about this movie being undeserving of hitting record numbers have to do with people not being allowed to leave their houses to do fun things and have opinions? It was a dumb thing to reply and you can get all the typical CN circle jerk stars from the same handful of posters as usual, but it doesn't make your comment relevant or sensible.

You neglected to mention that he's clearly implying he prefers to live in a world of introverts where no one leaves their house.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rigs said:

How should you have interpreted it?

That people should be allowed to go do what they want with their money. And there's no such thing as "deserving" at the box office.

And it's good that people are leaving their houses.

How else would you have interpreted it?

Unless you're politics obsessed, not in any way that it means you are "a hyper liberal".

Unhinged.


I'm far from politics obsessed, but I don't think many conservatives would ever try to block someone from leaving their house. I mean, 2020 was only a few years ago.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zgolfz85 said:

Rigs said:

Oh for sure.

And which side of that fence do you think you fall?

(Prob not the one you think.)


I'm not even going to respond to your nonsense. How you somehow extrapolated from my joking comment about it being criminal for this movie to do $1.5B in sales to me being a freedom hating hyper liberal is beyond me. Like wtf are you talking about

I think you missed the point that Rigs was being openly sarcastic.

It was difficult to tell that you were being hyperbolic because your expanded post about revising your rating down from 7.0 to 5.5 seems like an honest opinion and the work of someone who takes their movie going pretty serious.

It can be really difficult to read intent on a message board with so many hundreds of posters.
Rigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I'm far from politics obsessed, but I don't think many conservatives would ever try to block someone from leaving their house. I mean, 2020 was only a few years ago.
And again your comment was "tune into or ignore in terms of recommendations."

That's a fence. There are many fences.

"Hyper liberal or not" is not the only one.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rigs said:

How should you have interpreted it?

That people should be allowed to go do what they want with their money. And there's no such thing as "deserving" at the box office.

And it's good that people are leaving their houses.

How else would you have interpreted it?

Unless you're politics obsessed, not in any way that it means you are "a hyper liberal".

Unhinged.

Have you never heard the turn of phrase calling something "criminal" in a hyperbolic way? This is such a stupid argument.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread has never been the same since Backyard Gator caught Cliff Booth, put him in a well in his house and started wearing his skin as a suit.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today is the first day I could get a ticket for the 70mm imax screen, which worked out since the kids started school today. Just sat down.
Hincemm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
9/10.

Ellen page shenanigans and over the top last fight scene brought it down.

But just a little.
@NFLPlayerProps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Finally saw this yesterday in 70mm. Fantastic.
Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw this today. Thought this movie was epic. We loved it.
First Page
Page 129 of 130
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.