It Ends With Us Lawsuit

5,664 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by ABATTBQ11
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a mess this has turned into. Blake Lively is now suing Baldoni for sexual harassment.

https://www.businessinsider.com/blake-lively-lawsuit-against-justin-baldoni-5-bombshells-2024-12

Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

What a mess this has turned into. Blake Lively is now suing Baldoni for sexual harassment.

https://www.businessinsider.com/blake-lively-lawsuit-against-justin-baldoni-5-bombshells-2024-12




You can never truly understand how much some people simp for Hollywood stars until something like this happens. It's incredible how much people appear to be invested in Hollywood goings on. Twitter is awash with them. People really like to go to bat for Hollywood stars.
Madmarttigan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know if that's accurate completely there is a ton of Blake Lively hate on reddit. I don't think it's across all social media platforms. That being said people still also think the director is a PoS as well.
G.I.Bro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I kinda wonder what the thought process was. I mean you're messing with the wife of one of the biggest faces in Hollywood, I'm sure RR has enough pull to sink this guys career without a lawsuit. Did he think RR was so silly and fun that he wouldn't mind other men asking his wife about their orgasms?
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've known some dudes who are all out dogs with a lack of self-awareness and boundaries, but the allegations in that article are pretty out there even by sleazy standards.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The whole thing is wild.

-The movie did incredibly well at the box office, but the fighting began long before that.
-Lively allegedly delivered final cut, using her own editor, slicing out the director.
-That dude, already, was highly questionable. Backed by some weird cult religion money.
-Not sure who they thought they were messing with at any point, but messing with the wife of one of the richest and most powerful dudes in Hollywood probably ain't gonna work out, regardless of what his hired PR guns told him. She ain't in this one for money.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madmarttigan said:

I don't know if that's accurate completely there is a ton of Blake Lively hate on reddit. I don't think it's across all social media platforms. That being said people still also think the director is a PoS as well.


Well, according to the lawsuit, the Blake Lively hate was manufactured by the director's PR firm.

I haven't paid any attention to this until now, but it seems like it should be a pretty easy case if Lively is telling the truth. What she is allegeding will have plenty of witnesses and documentation.
rononeill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just hope RR is being appropriately supportive through all this.
Petrino1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like Lively felt fat shamed by Baldoni's comment when he asked his trainer in private how much she weighed due to his back problems, she took major offense to that due to recently having a baby, and then decided to go full scorched earth on him.

Who knows what really happened, but would be curious to hear his side of the story since all we are getting is Lively's side. With that said, they are both coming across pretty bad in this situation.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is interesting. My wife told me about some of this yesterday. Seems like…

- the film's story is one of abuse, but (allegedly) Lively wanted it marketed as a romance story and Baldoni wanted it as an abuse/survival story? He's known as a feminist of sorts
- the internet turns on Lively
- She sues him, alleging all kinds of ****ty behavior on set (the article from this thread)
- Texts leak between him and his lawyers, I guess, where he wants to run a PR campaign to destroy her? Maybe the same PR folks as those involved in the Johnny Depp / Amber Heard stuff?


It's an interesting case study in how quick we are to believe the latest news, and the worst about people we generally know nothing about. I'm mildly curious to see where it all lands… but at the same time I've never seen any of their films so I'm pretty unaffected either way. Other than wanting scumbags to be called out for their scumminess, if that's in fact the truth.
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Really good NY Times article on this:

Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni and a Smear Campaign After 'It Ends With Us' - The New York Times

Quote:

She detailed her complaints during a meeting with Mr. Baldoni, Mr. Heath and other producers in January, according to the legal filing. She claimed Mr. Baldoni had improvised unwanted kissing and discussed his sex life, including encounters in which he said he may not have received consent. Mr. Heath had shown her a video of his wife naked, she said, and he had watched Ms. Lively in her trailer when she was topless and having body makeup removed, despite her asking him to look away. She said that both men repeatedly entered her makeup trailer uninvited while she was undressed, including when she was breastfeeding.

Quote:

In an initial planning document sent to Wayfarer and Mr. Baldoni on Aug. 2, Ms. Nathan suggested media talking points, including that Ms. Lively used an imbalance of power to take creative control of the film.
But Mr. Baldoni wanted more.
"Not in love with the document they sent," he responded in a text exchange that included Ms. Abel and Mr. Heath. "Not sure I'm feeling the protection I felt on the call."
Ms. Abel relayed his frustration to Ms. Nathan: "I think you guys need to be tough and show the strength of what you guys can do in these scenarios. He wants to feel like she can be buried."
"Of course- but you know when we send over documents we can't send over the work we will or could do because that could get us in a lot of trouble," Ms. Nathan responded, adding, "We can't write we will destroy her."

Quote:

Ms. Nathan wrote to Ms. Abel: "And socials are really really ramping up. In his favour, she must be furious. It's actually sad because it just shows you have people really want to hate on women."

Baldoni sounds like a real piece of crap. This Melissa Nathan lady makes her money being a terrible person. What a bunch of trash.
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently, Baldoni thought so much of it that he's suing the NYT for 250 million.

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol. He's not making $25K off the Times for this, much less $250M.

Lot of talk about "cherry picking" from both sides.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is pretty crazy...


TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the record, I think all of these people suck, on both sides.

But these new developments are interesting and have certainly ratcheted up a notch…
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
May very well end up bad for Lively/Reynolds, but that lawyer is just doing his job, i.e. extreme bluff and bluster on his client's behalf.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

This is pretty crazy...




This has some of the Nicepool scenes.





NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For some reason a lot of those conclusions in those tweets seem like a stretch.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was about to say the exact opposite. For me, they basically confirm Reynolds/Lively's intent.
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:





That dude is full of ***** His client is cooked. He's got one text message, and you're going to hear about it and lot in this case, but it's not going to get them where they need.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't watched the videos but am I understanding this wrong? It feels like… Baldoni is a faux-feminist who ran a smear campaign on Lively, and her husband roasted him (in a way nobody even realized until now) in a movie for it.

To me that's kinda hilarious, not an admission of guilt or anything. Unless somehow them laughing at it or satirizing it means she isn't actually hurt or something. But I don't take that as an admission of guilt or making her complicit in anything. Petty, maybe, but if we believe those texts actually show Baldoni wanted a PR smear campaign against her then **** him, she's allowed a little pettiness.

But I could be way off on this!
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's shocking is that neither side mentioned a thing about this while the movie was exploding at the box office last summer. It's almost like they were OK with the terrible behavior that had taken place because they didn't want to miss out on the movie making hundreds of millions of dollars. I hate to sound jaded, but it almost feels like these famous people are able to put aside personal grievances when there's a giant stack of cash being poured down their maws at the box office and then "remember" later that they hate each other.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, they very much did, they just did it through publicists, which is how this town has worked for forever.

It was quite publicly known that there was a huge rift, that they wouldn't do press together, that her people took over cutting the movie, etc. That was ALL out there, leading up to the release.

What you're seeing now is a handful of rich people, who didn't like the way that played out for them, coming out publicly and showing the dirt using their actual names (also aided by publicists).
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No money will ever change hands in this thing, btw.

This is a case of Ryan Reynolds, who has hundreds of millions of dollars and no fks, to give standing up for his wife. And Baldoni mistakenly thinking he can buy his way into winning a press war, both in the first place, and now for attention.

Sorry dude- you're not that talented, and he'll never work on anything again. Really probably shouldn't have pissed off a woman with too much money, resources, and a machine behind her. I mean, any halfway intelligent person could have told you anywhere along the way that was not gonna be a good idea.

She was already in actress wasteland anyway, which is why she even did this hack job production of a movie in the first place. It wasn't for the money. She just wanted to remain relevant as an actress.

Everybody loses. This is a bunch of legal/press warfare between people with enough resources just wanting to be publicly considered "the winner".
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This feels like career suicide for Baldoni. Even if he wins this case. Blake has a long history, more money than almost anyone in Hollywood and a powerful husband. He has, what?
OnlyForNow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is Baldoni's case against Lively and Reynolds? That the NicePool character was based on him - but he didn't receive royalties or something? Or some mudslinging from them not really covered here?
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OnlyForNow said:

What is Baldoni's case against Lively and Reynolds? That the NicePool character was based on him - but he didn't receive royalties or something? Or some mudslinging from them not really covered here?
That's what has me scratching my head. Assuming for sake of argument that Nicepool is based on Baldoni, it's clearly a parody, which is protected speech.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

What is Baldoni's case against Lively and Reynolds?
He doesn't have one.

Which is why he sued the NYTimes for $250M, and not Lively/Reynolds.

He CAN sue anyone for anything. He will lose a suit against a media outlet for cherry picking certain things, when he is documented as PAYING MONEY to help media outlets cherry pick certain things.

His lawyer CAN say he will sue Ryan Reynolds, but won't say for what.


Attention whoring at its best.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the record, I only posted the Nicepool stuff because of how crazy it is that that's been hiding in plain sight this whole time. I don't see it actually affecting the case.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does baldoni drive a Honda odyssey?
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OnlyForNow said:

What is Baldoni's case against Lively and Reynolds? That the NicePool character was based on him - but he didn't receive royalties or something? Or some mudslinging from them not really covered here?


Slander or libel maybe. Doubt it has anything to do with "NicePool."
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And the Nicepool parody goes viral. Also it looks like Baldoni's publicist's firm was the one who produced all those damning text messages in response to a subpoena. Jones is suing him for breach of contract after firing his personal publicist (who was about to leave to start her own firm according to one of the links embedded in the article). Snatched Abel's phone and served it up on platter to Reynolds and co. in exchange for a release no doubt.

Chuckle at Baldoni being afraid he was going to hurt his back trying to lift Lively and that's why he was so concerned about her weight.

Fun stuff.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/justin-baldoni-demands-disney-marvel-214500913.html

Quote:

. . .
The fallout radius of the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni legal battle continues to spread, with Marvel president Kevin Feige, Disney CEO Bob Iger and director Tim Miller becoming the latest industry figures swept into the drama.

On Jan. 7, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman sent a litigation hold letter to Feige and Iger in connection with his client's "anticipated claims" against Ryan Reynolds, Lively and other unnamed parties. Variety has viewed a copy of the letter, which calls on the studio to preserve all relevant documents and data with regards to Baldoni.
. . .
But Baldoni's attorney believes that Lively's husband Ryan Reynolds was flagrantly mocking Baldoni in a sequence in Marvel's "Deadpool & Wolverine," which was released by Disney in July.
. . .
The litigation hold letter, sent the day the fires began, calls for Marvel and Disney to preserve "any and all documents relating to the development of the 'Nicepool' character" as well as "communications relating to the development, writing, and filming of storylines and scenes featuring 'Nicepool.'" The letter also calls for the studio to retain "' and all documents relating to or reflecting a deliberate attempt to mock, harass, ridicule, intimidate, or bully Baldoni through the character of 'Nicepool.'"
. . .
On Dec. 31, Baldoni and nine others sued the New York Times for $250 million over its story that relied heavily on a letter filed with the California Civil Rights Department by Lively that accused the director of sexual harassment and carrying out a retaliatory online campaign.
. . .
During an appearance on "The Megyn Kelly Show" on Jan. 7, Freedman referenced the Nicepool character. "There's no question it relates to Justin. I mean, anybody that watched that hair bun," Freedman said. He also questioned why Reynolds would use his wife's alleged sexual harassment for comedic fodder. "If somebody is seriously sexually harassed, you don't make fun of it. It's a serious issue," Freedman added.

The litigation hold letter, which was written ahead of "anticipated claims relate to Reynolds and Lively's tortious interference with contract and civil extortion," goes well beyond the Nicepool character and implies that a Lively/Baldoni-style rift exists between Reynolds and Miller, who directed the first "Deadpool" movie but did not return for the sequel or "Deadpool & Wolverine." (The director and star are known to have clashed.) The letter instructs the studio to preserve any documents and data "relating to complaints made against Ryan Reynolds by any person, including without limitation Tim Miller" and Miller's departure from the film "Deadpool 2" as well as any instances of Reynolds exerting "creative control of any film project." (Miller did not respond to an immediate request for comment.)

A litigation hold letter often precedes litigation. Baldoni has not sued Lively or Reynolds, but Freedman has indicated that a suit is imminent, telling Kelly that he plans to sue the Hollywood power couple "into oblivion."

After Baldoni and a group that also includes publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel sued the Times in Los Angeles Superior Court, Lively filed suit against the plaintiffs in federal court in a complaint that mirrored her CRD letter. And Baldoni's former publicist Stephanie Jones sued him and Abel and Nathan. Jones claims that Baldoni breached his contract and that Nathan and Abel conspired to attack her. Lively's attorneys confirmed that Jones' company was the source of the text messages that appear in the actress' CRD letter and the Times story.

In "Deadpool & Wolverine," Nicepool says of Ladypool: "She is gorgeous. She just had a baby too, and you can't even tell." That would seem to mirror Lively's allegation that Baldoni fat-shamed her with similar comments after she gave birth to her fourth child. (Baldoni's Times lawsuit claims that he asked their mutual trainer about her weight because of back issues that limited the number of pounds he could lift.)
. . .
vmiaptetr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://apple.news/Ahjrw3rEoSL6I1ybd8hrNhQ

Justin suing the Reynold's for $400 million.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lololol.

Legal strategy is- get as much attention as you can.

Stacking a $400M lawsuit on top of $250M says you think sustained damages of $650M.

Dude wasn't even worth $650K.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.