Brittmoore Car Club said:
TCTTS said:
Brittmoore Car Club said:
TCTTS said:
Brittmoore Car Club said:
Tibbers said:
TCTTS said:
I don't even know why I'm engaging with you anymore - clearly you're inventing things now, to a deranged degree, frankly - but I never once said that Tim Ballard didn't save children from human trafficking. I linked to an article that pointed out a few apparent inconsistencies in his stories, that's all. But never once did I even remotely suggest that he didn't save children, nor did I ever criticize his efforts in that regard. For the 400th time, my gripe was with the PROMOTION of the movie, not the movie itself.
so you agree that you were wrong and that Tim Ballard did those things and said those things? Just curious how far you'd like to backtrack. So he's not a lunatic? Because before you called him a lunatic. Just trying to understand.
Remember, the poster you are talking to likes Jimmy Kimmel, and doesn't consider him a lunatic. Even though he has openly wished death and suffering on unvaxxed hospital patients to thunderous Hollywood applause and has used the n-word and cried on air over a lion dying lol. Meryl Streep, also not a lunatic.
but Tim Ballard, former Spec-Ops who has devoted his life to rescuing children from the sex slave trade...lunatic.
The Hollywood bubble is VERY real.
Dude, you need to get off this Jimmy Kimmel thing. It's super weird. You keep harping about it on F16 and on here. You listed like eight celebrities and said that if I expressed any disdain whatsoever for any of them, you might have "some" respect me. Not that I at all cared about your respect, but I thought, "Ok, I actually don't like most of these people, so here's a chance to build a bridge." I then listed the reasons why I didn't like all but one of them, and thought surely that might count for something, and that we could share a connection there. But no, instead, you immediately popped over to F16 and giddily started telling people that I loved Jimmy Kimmel, conveniently leaving out the fact that I *agreed* with you on everyone else, just like you're doing now.
Like, how do you not see how disingenuous that is?
No, it's not disingenuous...you refuse to call Meryl Streep and Jimmy Kimmel (two very unstable narcissistic and hate filled people) lunatics, while calling Tim Ballard a lunatic. It's hilarious.
Anyone not completely consumed in the Hollywood bubble can see how absurd that is.
Out of all the celebrities named, I didn't "refuse" to call Meryl Streep a lunatic, I must have forgotten to address her. Regardless, these are some of the most insane nitpicks/complaints/standards I've ever seen. Never mind the fact that I don't owe anyone here anything.
Also, if Tim Ballard believes in QAnon conspiracies, I'm sorry, but that does, in fact, make him a lunatic. I can simultaneously applaud his efforts, and find him to be a noble, courageous person, but if he indeed believes the same things Caviezel does - about Adrenochroming, an evil cabal of devil-worshipping cannibals, etc - that makes him gullible at best, or someone with nefarious political motivations at worst.
OK...And IMO if anyone thinks (like the vast majority of the left does) that chemically castrating minors or removing their breasts is humane "gender affirming care", or believed the "OMG RUSSAIA COLLUSION" confirmed hoax, or that the FBI did not collude with big tech to influence the 2020 election, or a number of other things the devout left has taken the bait on time and time again, they are lunatics. So congrats, almost all of Hollywood are lunatics.
All that said, I am not sure I really want to know what goes on in the shadows among certain perverted segments of the elite. We KNOW crazy warped sh** goes on in the hood, trailer parks, and sometimes the burbs. Why not among the rich and powerful who have exhausted every pleasure known to man? Yeah, the satanic ritual stuff loses me (I'm surprised to hear Caviezel buys into that TBH), but we do KNOW that there was an entire ISLAND devoted to sex parties and that the two ring leaders were busted and one "killed himself" under surveillance when the cameras weren't working, but not a single client of theirs was ever named. And we do KNOW that in numerous third world countries, children are captured and sold into the sex trade and some children and babies are even killed for their organs and body parts, and that in FL a major child porn ring was just busted with over like 100k videos and images that included babies and toddlers. So honestly...it would not surprise me if there were groups of rich evil perverts engaging in bizarre sexual rituals involving children. I can at least see how some normal decent God-fearing people would see such a level of evil and then be susceptible to some of the theories.
That being said, what we know is bad enough...no need to push theories of adrenochrome and satanic sex cults...and if you do, you better have the receipts to back it up.
These are all great points, and we're basically on the same page. Like you, I have absolutely no doubt that crazy, evil sh*t goes on among certain elites, in Hollywood and elsewhere. And yes, the entire Epstein saga is basically proof of this.
It's not that I have a problem with people believing in that sort of thing in general, or hell, even believing in conspiracy theories (I'm currently participating in a UAP/alien thread, so who am I to talk). It's when someone peddles conspiracy theories that so clearly come directly from QAnon, when QAnon is so clearly A) bullsh*t, and B) politically driven.
In a vacuum, if Caviezel wants to pontificate that there might be a group of rich evil perverts out there doing this, fine, whatever. The tell, however, is that he believes in the QAnon-peddled, QAnon brand of rich evil perverts, and all the insanity that goes along with that. A group whose sole purpose, again, is politically motivated, to paint one side as the devil and rile up the other side to demonize and vilify them, sometimes to the point of violence. Which tells me that *Caviezel* is politically motivated to paint one side as the devil and rile up the other side to demonize and vilify them, sometimes to the point of violence.
In other words, he's USING this issue - and thus these victims - to advance his own political agenda, which I simply find to be abhorrent. I have absolutely no doubt that he cares about these kids and this issue deeply, but to then use those kids and this issue in attempt to paint one side as evil and responsible, I'm sorry, but that's beyond f/cked up, and something I have a huge problem with.
