Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
YouBet said:
I've played every console since I'm old enough to have been around when it all started. The two moments in gaming that I always think of are:
1. Goldeneye on N64.
2. Baldur's Gate on PC.
Oooh, look me. I was the rich kid...rhutton125 said:
Had both.
King's Quest is a good call. Many hours in that.Proposition Joe said:YouBet said:
I've played every console since I'm old enough to have been around when it all started. The two moments in gaming that I always think of are:
1. Goldeneye on N64.
2. Baldur's Gate on PC.
1. Super Mario Bros on NES.
2. King's Quest on PC.
3. Super Mario 64 on N64.
Honorable Mentions:
First time I did VR on a high end HTC Vive rig.
Final Fantasy 7 - while not the dawn of gaming cinematics, it was a whole other level.
Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
I would hardly call Nintendo a "niche" product. The Switch will likely end up being the #3 console of all time (behind the PS2 and their own DS). Despite some missteps with both the GameCube and WiiU, I think they are still the top video game company out there. Sony is the only one who is close, but they really only make consoles. Nintendo makes both consoles and games. They are also much more creative than Sony (and MS). Each PlayStation is essentially just a hardware upgrade over the previous generation. There's really not much different about each generation. Nintendo on the other hand tries to do something different with each new console. Sometimes it fails (see WiiU), and other times it succeeds massively (Switch, Wii, DS).Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
That's correct. Nintendo and Sony were partnering to make a CD add on to the Super Nintendo (like the Sega CD). However, Nintendo got suspicious that Sony intended on making their own console, so Nintendo backed out. Nintendo was kind of correct, because Sony was exploring what it would take to make their own console, but they certainly had no definitive plans. After Nintendo backed out, though, Sony was pissed and went full in on creating the PlayStation. I think it's likely that if Nintendo had not backed out, that Sony would have still created a PlayStation, but Nintendo certainly lit a fire under them.TXAG 05 said:Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
If I remember correctly, Nintendo had been working with Sony to make their next gen console to be CD based instead of cartridge, then for whatever reason Nintendo decided to stick with cartridges and came up with the N64 and Sony did the PlayStation.
91_Aggie said:
Intellivision forever!!!
Sony and Microsoft both make games as well as consoles, and both have a larger market share than Nintendo. Nintendo certainly has some strong brands in their original games and tends to do very high quality editions with each generation, but they're still well behind the other two in a lot of ways, and their business model trends toward stubbornness when it comes to adapting to modern standards, something which particularly harms their ability to work with third party developers.AustinAg2K said:I would hardly call Nintendo a "niche" product. The Switch will likely end up being the #3 console of all time (behind the PS2 and their own DS). Despite some missteps with both the GameCube and WiiU, I think they are still the top video game company out there. Sony is the only one who is close, but they really only make consoles. Nintendo makes both consoles and games. They are also much more creative than Sony (and MS). Each PlayStation is essentially just a hardware upgrade over the previous generation. There's really not much different about each generation. Nintendo on the other hand tries to do something different with each new console. Sometimes it fails (see WiiU), and other times it succeeds massively (Switch, Wii, DS).Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
The Collective said:91_Aggie said:
Intellivision forever!!!
B-17 Bomber!
BowSowy said:
We had the NES and SNES growing up, but the most nostalgia I have is for the N64. Specifically Goldeneye with the kids that lived on our street growing up. Although one of them always tried to cheat and pick Oddjob (looking at you, Chipotlemonger).
The Collective said:91_Aggie said:
Intellivision forever!!!
B-17 Bomber!
My dad bought us the Magnavox Odyssey. I feel your pain. Although I still have good memories. Then straight on to the original NES through elementary school. Didn't game much with activities in Jr High and High School. But by college, NCAA Football required the PlayStation.AustinAg2K said:
For those who grew up in the 90s, which system did you own? I preferred the Super Nintendo, even though I actually didn't own either. My parents were the type of parents who bought me a PC when I asked for a Super Nintendo. I thought Sonic was pretty awesome, but that was the only game on the Genesis I had any interest in. What I really wanted, was Zelda and Mario.
Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
bluefire579 said:Sony and Microsoft both make games as well as consoles, and both have a larger market share than Nintendo. Nintendo certainly has some strong brands in their original games and tends to do very high quality editions with each generation, but they're still well behind the other two in a lot of ways, and their business model trends toward stubbornness when it comes to adapting to modern standards, something which particularly harms their ability to work with third party developers.AustinAg2K said:I would hardly call Nintendo a "niche" product. The Switch will likely end up being the #3 console of all time (behind the PS2 and their own DS). Despite some missteps with both the GameCube and WiiU, I think they are still the top video game company out there. Sony is the only one who is close, but they really only make consoles. Nintendo makes both consoles and games. They are also much more creative than Sony (and MS). Each PlayStation is essentially just a hardware upgrade over the previous generation. There's really not much different about each generation. Nintendo on the other hand tries to do something different with each new console. Sometimes it fails (see WiiU), and other times it succeeds massively (Switch, Wii, DS).Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
The Switch has obviously been a success, and I would expect to see them continue to lean into the portability aspect moving forward.

Proposition Joe said:YouBet said:
I've played every console since I'm old enough to have been around when it all started. The two moments in gaming that I always think of are:
1. Goldeneye on N64.
2. Baldur's Gate on PC.
1. Super Mario Bros on NES.
2. King's Quest on PC.
3. Super Mario 64 on N64.
Honorable Mentions:
First time I did VR on a high end HTC Vive rig.
Final Fantasy 7 - while not the dawn of gaming cinematics, it was a whole other level.

Not sure where they're getting their numbers, but Microsoft has been steadily climbing with their acquisitions. Reports I've seen for this year are similar, but obviously incomplete.Brian Earl Spilner said:bluefire579 said:Sony and Microsoft both make games as well as consoles, and both have a larger market share than Nintendo. Nintendo certainly has some strong brands in their original games and tends to do very high quality editions with each generation, but they're still well behind the other two in a lot of ways, and their business model trends toward stubbornness when it comes to adapting to modern standards, something which particularly harms their ability to work with third party developers.AustinAg2K said:I would hardly call Nintendo a "niche" product. The Switch will likely end up being the #3 console of all time (behind the PS2 and their own DS). Despite some missteps with both the GameCube and WiiU, I think they are still the top video game company out there. Sony is the only one who is close, but they really only make consoles. Nintendo makes both consoles and games. They are also much more creative than Sony (and MS). Each PlayStation is essentially just a hardware upgrade over the previous generation. There's really not much different about each generation. Nintendo on the other hand tries to do something different with each new console. Sometimes it fails (see WiiU), and other times it succeeds massively (Switch, Wii, DS).Proposition Joe said:DallasTeleAg said:
Perhaps, but they seem to have righted the ship to be their own thing, existing outside of the console wars. I think the Switch is an amazing console, helped heavily by BotW being in my top 3 games of all time.
No doubt they've carved out a still very profitable niche and that there's still demand for their products. Their in-house development is still second to none.
But it wasn't by choice that they fell out of the console arms race. It's discussed in the book, but it really is super interesting story about their rise and (somewhat) fall - all centered around control.
Playstation essentially was born because Nintendo embarrassed Sony at the altar.
The Switch has obviously been a success, and I would expect to see them continue to lean into the portability aspect moving forward.
Microsoft solidly in third place in both console and software sales.
I can hear it like it was yesterday.Cromagnum said:The Collective said:91_Aggie said:
Intellivision forever!!!
B-17 Bomber!
Beeeeee Seventane Balmer!
Sounds like a decent little SaturdayUrban Ag said:
Then hot chicks, sex, football, and beer took over