guadalupeag said:
Rex Racer said:
Ken Scarborough said:
Rex Racer said:
Ken Scarborough said:
Rex Racer said:
Ken Scarborough said:
Rex Racer said:
Ken Scarborough said:
canadiaggie said:
Ken Scarborough said:
That's some ****ed up *****
Dude is guilty as ****.
They found the victim's car behind one of the other unnamed suspect's house and refused to investigate further. The prosecutors at the time apparently knew that this other suspect threatened to make the victim "disappear." The prosecutors were aware of this before Adnan was convicted.
Did he do it? No clue. But not investigating the other possibilities and honing in on one guy when there was a lot of evidence suppressed that pointed at others is not how the justice system should work.
Dude...his" friend" was shown the body by Syed. His "friend" helped bury her.
He's guilty.
At the same time he's served a lot of time and he was only 17.
His "friend"... You're referring to Jay. Jay told so many different stories that he has absolutely ZERO credibility. And he was led through his interview by the police. Adnan should have never been convicted. I don't know if Adnan did it or not. I lean towards "not". But he definitely should not have been convicted.
You'll neve con
Tell me you haven't studied the case without telling me you haven't studied the case.
Have listened to every podcast I could find on the case, including Undisclosed, which goes into a LOT more depth than Serial. There is zero credibility to anything Jay says.
Undisclosed is literally out out by Adnans defense team.
There's a reason why project innocence stopped looking into it.
Oh well. He did it. He may get out but it's not like he got away with it.
I'm finished discussing this.
No, it was started by Rabia, a friend, but there are two other unrelated attorneys on the podcast. And the evidence doesn't lie. The police focused on Adnan and did what they to do to ensure a conviction.
You are correct. The evidence doesn't lie.
I thought you were done. There is no evidence that Adnan is guilty. None.
Jay knew where the victims car was parked. How did he know that if Adnan wasn't involved?
That's the thing. We do not know for sure that Jay knew where the car was parked. And even if he did, he drove that area all the time and could have just seen it while driving around. Or, perhaps he knew where it was because HE put it there. Or perhaps he knows the real killer (some other third party besides Adnan).
It still is not evidence against Adnan. The only thing the prosecution has on Adnan is Jay's word, and he has changed his story every single time he has told it. Literally EVERY SINGLE TIME.
I don't believe Jay, and his mangled word is not enough to convict someone of murder, in my book. He's completely unreliable.
Adnan very well might have done it. I don't personally think so. But in either case, the problem I have with his conviction is the cops' manipulation of things and Jay's stories being the only evidence they had. The cell tower ping evidence is so incredibly weak once you understand it, particularly back then.
