I'm a huge fan of the show and W's head was on a pike?!?
Another thing, I think some people give Polanski a little bit of PTSD leeway because of what happened to his wife. Also, hasn't Polanski's victim forgiven him and sorta played it off in a way?Charpie said:
One gets caught up in the "art" of things.
It's like my love for The Beatles. Just because I loved their music doesn't make me a druggie.
I get that it's on a grander scale in Hollywood, but the premise is the same
TCTTS said:
I'll give you TLJ's wealth inequality. That was eye roll inducing and handled terribly. But Wall-E as "political propaganda"? Come on.
Yeah, there's a huge difference between a theme of good/evil/authoritarian/etc and just forcing a trump joke in say ballers for a bad laugh. Sure, it happened a ton in the past, but that doesn't mean people didn't complain about it back then. They just didn't have an internet forum to complain about it on or twitter.aTmAg said:I don't expect all politics to be removed, but I'm going to point out when the politics they inject is naive and idiotic. Discussing movies (all aspects) is what this board is all about.TCTTS said:
To me, jabs here and there aren't as bad as when movies lie about events to push their propaganda. For example, I bet the average American still incorrectly thinks that poor people really were locked behind gates to die on the Titanic or that they limited life boats in order to not "disrupt the view". For 30 years Americans were irrationally scared to death of nuclear energy because of The China Syndrome. Meryl Streep helped put many apple growers out of business due to her bogus 60 minutes apple scare broadcast. Crap like that.The Lost said:Yeah, there's a huge difference between a theme of good/evil/authoritarian/etc and just forcing a trump joke in say ballers for a bad laugh. Sure, it happened a ton in the past, but that doesn't mean people didn't complain about it back then. They just didn't have an internet forum to complain about it on or twitter.aTmAg said:
I don't expect all politics to be removed, but I'm going to point out when the politics they inject is naive and idiotic. Discussing movies (all aspects) is what this board is all about.
With how many options there are for entertainment now, it probably matters more than ever because it's easy to not watch certain things.
Also, this guy in the tweets thinks he's way smarter than he actually is.
If somebody knowingly lies about something, how is that not their fault?Charpie said:
But why is that the fault of the entertainment industry?
TCTTS said:
I'll give you TLJ's wealth inequality. That was eye roll inducing and handled terribly. But Wall-E as "political propaganda"? Come on.
You understand... most movies are fiction. Right?Quote:
To me, jabs here and there aren't as bad as when movies lie about events to push their propaganda.
Tell that to the people who have lost their jobs or had a whole host of other bad things happen to them as a result.Charpie said:
Dude..its a movie.
Plenty of them are based (or pretend to be based) on factual events.Brian Earl Spilner said:You understand... most movies are fiction. Right?Quote:
To me, jabs here and there aren't as bad as when movies lie about events to push their propaganda.
And yes, I'm including movies "based on real events".
So what have I said that in any way implies that I'm not interested in a discussion? Is it simply because I haven't agreed that you are right and I'm wrong? Is that all it takes to be accused of not being "interested in a discussion"?Charpie said:
This is what we were talking about before. You aren't interested in a discussion.
The nuclear industry was severely hampered after the China Syndrome. Many promising nuclear research was cancelled as a result of the political pressure. Those are real jobs lost and societal benefits squandered. And it's impossible for me to know how many exactly, but it was a lot.Quote:
But hey, I'll play. Can you site people who lost their jobs over a movie? How many jobs were lost?