I'm the same way
This is completely understandable to me, and I'm right there with you in that regard. I totally get not wanting to see something out of a straight up dislike for whoever's involved with the movie. Especially if that person is a blatant/obvious assh*le. But yeah, when it comes to guys like Damon or Clooney, who are, by all accounts, genuinely good guys, I just don't get the hate simply because they have different politics.Quote:
This actually goes beyond mere politics for me. I am looking at someone who I just simply do not like. Political opinions may come in to this, but it could also be something like who they are as a person. I cannot stand Sean Penn and could not see me ever having a beer with him. Someone like Clooney or Damon seem like nice enough guys that I simply think are wrong in their political beliefs.
TCTTS with the fake news.....TCTTS said:"Ignorance" according to your opinion. You state it as if you're opinion is fact/right, and it very well could be, but you're being just as stubborn in believing what you believe as they are. And I'm not saying that in a way to disagree with you politically or anything like that. But "ignorance" can go both ways.Quote:
It's not that I'm offended by opinions.. it's that the people I am boycotting use their public avenue to spout ignorance.First of all, their "pull" was rejected by a majority of the electoral college, not a majority of the population. As to your second point, how are you not doing the exact same thing? You're speaking down to/ill of someone you feel is awful for endorsing someone/something you disagree with. No, you don't have the platform they do, but how are you not expressing literally the exact same sentiment, just on the other side of the fence?Quote:
They can't understand that their political pull was completely rejected by the majority of the country.. they have to speak down to us about how awful we are for electing someone they disagree with.
Pretty genius.Sex Panther said:
I'm the same way
TCTTS said:Ha, I edit the sh*t out of nearly everything I post. Half the time it's simply to correct typos (which I do one at a time), and the other half are attempts to phrase something better. I'm kind of a freak when it comes to stuff like that. My least favorite feature on the "new" TexAgs is, hands down, the edit count. How on earth is that even a feature?ATM1876 said:
9 edits has to be some kind of record!
so, really, pretty damn bad, then.redline248 said:Unrelated to the topic, mostly, but I predict this Wall movie will be nowhere near as good as Pacific Rim.jabberwalkie09 said:oragator said:
A amazingly, it has already done 203mm in China against a budget of 150 million.
Even if it just does 200mm in the rest of the world they are likely to break even on it. Becoming a new hollow wood paradigm - -make China happy and you have a large security deposit on your investment.
Wasn't this kind of the case already with Pacific Rim?
Quote:
I like the posters on here that say "I hate this actor's political stance so much that I will not see any of their movies unless they look good".
ATM1876 said:Teacher_Ag said:
I love movies, I see a ton of them and read a lot of reviews and analysis to further my understanding and appreciation of them. In the course of doing this, the only place I can ever remember coming across anything about an actor's personal views like you describe is TexAgs. Admittedly, I'm not on Facebook or Twitter and don't have a cable tv subscription, but perhaps you'd be a lot happier just avoiding whatever medium you're getting all of these celebrity viewpoints from that are so distressing to you so that you'd be able to enjoy more of their work
HeadGames said:
Is there really a difference between boycotting actors who suck and actors you disagree with?
I know a few of you refuse to watch movies with Marion Cotillard, and I doubt it's because she's a French socialist.
I refuse to watch movies with Jamie Foxx, he's 100% garbage, and anyone who was in mama Mia. Not because of politics, but how awful that movie was.
SeattleAgJr said:
has matt damon in it.
automatic pass for me.
he is part of the cadre of Hollywood elite I will go out of my way to avoid their movies.
I still see the occasional one (the martian) but that is the exception.
Bruce Almighty said:GeorgePlimpton said:
Every time I see that preview I'm completely flabbergasted. How the hell did he ever think that was a good idea? It's like Edward Norton being in that god awful Italian job remake
I liked the Italian Job remake.
ATM1876 said:
I just find it so much easier to judge actors by their individual acting performances irregardless of any outside factors. In one of the examples that you gave, I thought Jaime Foxx was excellent in Django Unchained, Collateral, and Ray. I thought he could have been better in White House Down, Horrible Bosses and Annie but that may just be because I didn't enjoy those movies that much. Adding in all of these other externalities to make such absolute statements about somebody and their work just seems unnecessarily complicated to me, but to each his own.
I actually thought that was well cast. It was easy to absolutely hate Norton's character.GeorgePlimpton said:
Every time I see that preview I'm completely flabbergasted. How the hell did he ever think that was a good idea? It's like Edward Norton being in that god awful Italian job remake
You should read up on the reason he's portrayed that way in the movie. It's almost funnier than why you think.Belton Ag said:
I've always thought there was a reason Matt and Trey made fun of him in Team America.
And yeah, he does come across that way when it comes to politics - at least to middle Americans. I say this as a guy that has no issues watching him or Clooney or any other actor for that matter.