Saw this over Thanksgiving weekend. Badass movie. Haven't seen a movie like this, but it had me wired the whole way.
quote:
I don't think I've seen unanimous love for a single movie on TexAgs maybe... ever?
quote:
I think it's safe to say this is now officially the most well-received release in TexAgs history. Never would I have guessed that Fast Fred, of all people, would be the lone holdout, though.
quote:There wasn't anything subjective about the criticism he was receiving. THe kid was clearly playing offbeat
The protagonists situation is just completely unenviable. I have trouble understanding musicians like him. I can't fully empathize with the value he assigns to a figurehead, when his craft is essentially an art. I understand and accept that figureheads in art are figureheads for a reason, and I accept that it is possible for one person to have a great affinity, passion and insight into the beauty of their art than another. I'm stuck in that belief that all art is beautiful and that everyone is equally adept at it. For instance, I fully accept that a master chef can observe my eating habits and know better than I do what I would like to eat than myself. I have no problem with accepting that concept, but I could never trust any expert in any field of art in the same way that the protagonist did in this film. I'm not saying that he was foolish to do so, but rather that I just don't have the nerve and commitment to devote myself as an apprentice in such a way in a subjective field. I wouldn't be able to find that sort of certainty within uncertainty.
I'm reminded of one apprentice in Jiro Dreams of Sushi Who made egg omelet sushi day after day. Each day, Jiro would throw it out as it just wasn't good enough. One day, after hundreds of attempts, the apprentice was able to produce a satisfactory product. The thing is, my impression is that at this point the apprentice wasn't satisfied only to meet the standards of his master, but that he himself was able to see the vague/subtle perfection which Jiro had been aiming for. It was a subjective mark to meet, but it seemed as though once the apprentice reached that mark, he was in complete agreement with Jiro, that there was a right way, or rather a best way to make egg omelet sushi.
That perfectionism in craft/art is hard for me to get into, when it feels like I'm seeking a moving target. All I can say is that I believe in the people who are able to do this. I don't believe that subjective perfectionism is complete bull****, but only technically bull****. It can't technically be true, but those that seek it seem to be to be onto something, at least in the example of Whiplash and Jiro Dreams of Sushi. There is not a better answer, but there is a best answer, and these are the individuals who are pushing the envelope on that best answer. It seems like it is a very difficult path to go down, a path on which don't know where you're going until you've reached that point. This is a concept that I struggle with, but I feel I have sort of a grasp and appreciation for.
quote:Right. There's definitely correct technical skill to be perfected under a person like that. Tempo isn't an area in which your understanding of your objective improves in parallel with your pursuit of that objective. No doubt, there is a right answer when it comes to tempo, but there are definitely subtleties in drumming for which there are only better answers and worse answers.quote:There wasn't anything subjective about the criticism he was receiving. The kid was clearly playing offbeat
The protagonists situation is just completely unenviable. I have trouble understanding musicians like him. I can't fully empathize with the value he assigns to a figurehead, when his craft is essentially an art. I understand and accept that figureheads in art are figureheads for a reason, and I accept that it is possible for one person to have a great affinity, passion and insight into the beauty of their art than another. I'm stuck in that belief that all art is beautiful and that everyone is equally adept at it. For instance, I fully accept that a master chef can observe my eating habits and know better than I do what I would like to eat than myself. I have no problem with accepting that concept, but I could never trust any expert in any field of art in the same way that the protagonist did in this film. I'm not saying that he was foolish to do so, but rather that I just don't have the nerve and commitment to devote myself as an apprentice in such a way in a subjective field. I wouldn't be able to find that sort of certainty within uncertainty.
I'm reminded of one apprentice in Jiro Dreams of Sushi Who made egg omelet sushi day after day. Each day, Jiro would throw it out as it just wasn't good enough. One day, after hundreds of attempts, the apprentice was able to produce a satisfactory product. The thing is, my impression is that at this point the apprentice wasn't satisfied only to meet the standards of his master, but that he himself was able to see the vague/subtle perfection which Jiro had been aiming for. It was a subjective mark to meet, but it seemed as though once the apprentice reached that mark, he was in complete agreement with Jiro, that there was a right way, or rather a best way to make egg omelet sushi.
That perfectionism in craft/art is hard for me to get into, when it feels like I'm seeking a moving target. All I can say is that I believe in the people who are able to do this. I don't believe that subjective perfectionism is complete bull****, but only technically bull****. It can't technically be true, but those that seek it seem to be to be onto something, at least in the example of Whiplash and Jiro Dreams of Sushi. There is not a better answer, but there is a best answer, and these are the individuals who are pushing the envelope on that best answer. It seems like it is a very difficult path to go down, a path on which don't know where you're going until you've reached that point. This is a concept that I struggle with, but I feel I have sort of a grasp and appreciation for.
quote:This begs the question if movie would have worked ifdrumming wasnt the focus. Tempo is easy to define but the subtleties of great drumming are so very difficult to explain even for musicians. Watching a sax player run scales in front of a tuner wouldn't have been nearly as interesting. Also, drumming usually isn'tsupposed to be heard so much as felt. For a drummer knowing when, and probably more important when not use a fill is half the musical battle. When the fill or a hit is good it may go unnoticed but when it's wrong it sticks out. It comes back to musicality*.
Tempo isn't an area in which your understanding of your objective improves in parallel with your pursuit of that objective. No doubt, there is a right answer when it comes to tempo, but there are definitely subtleties in drumming for which there are only better answers and worse answers.
quote:Just ask Neiman, for many it isn't subjective and it's worth the sacrifice. For those with the actual talent and mindset to reach the closest levels of perfection never seem to think they're crazy, It's just who they are. It's more painful for us, because to them it's not a sacrifice, it's just "going to work."
And to reiterate what TCCTS has said, such a path for subjective perfection is not worth the sacrifices to any sane human being. That level of perfection is completely unreasonable and so completely decadent. It's painful to behold.
This subject is quite difficult to articulate.