First of all, somebody in this thread said it well earlier in this thread. This guy sounds like a grade A a-hole, but guess what? There are many of those out there. He sounds like he just wants to be heard and his cause is probably dwarfed over, because he tries to capture audiences and attention with sensationalism.
In the real world, tons of people (especially those in superior work roles to your own) are a-holes, because they can be. They have huge egos and talk all sorts of crap. You begin to really hate them, but 95% of those people got there because they know their stuff. You might get bad grades for not being a yes man to his ideas, but there will be situations in your careers where the best thing you can do is be a yes man and you'll see it when you are out of school. I'm not saying that you should always go with the crowd, but the fact is sometimes you just have to know when to fall in line and conform.
I know exactly what this guy is doing. He's attempting to incite real thought from people by ticking them off. I guarantee you that if you stick with this class, there will be times when he stews something up in you that will keep you angry, but thinking. The problem is that when you are angry, you don't think logically.
A university needs a guy like this to stir the pot. I don't agree with what he's saying or how he says it, but he's the kind who will keep folks from falling on their heels. He keeps the university's balance from falling into the YCT's lap and their ridiculous ideas of caucasion oppression.
Also, the Q-drop deal is cool. I wish they were stricter in all colleges. I maintained a decent GPR while in school, but I felt like it was too much grade inflation at A&M. Probably due to scantron tests and stuff

.
[This message has been edited by ATM9000 (edited 1/24/2004 8:47p).]