If you had the option to live in any city in Texas with a population of 30-40,000, what would be your choice?
Ragoo said:
Does McQueeney count?
That's just sexing up West SeguinRagoo said:
Does McQueeney count?
i was thinking general proximity to higher density population. And let's be honest only the lake matters.Cstrickland05 said:Ragoo said:
Does McQueeney count?
Too small for the OP, only like 2K people. Maybe Seguin, but don't know how big they are now. Plus it's Seguin
Potcake said:
Username fits
Stockholm Syndrome said:
Welp I'm in Lufkin so I guess I'll just go with that. Worse places to be than a forest.
New Braunfels around 1990 was nice. Short lines at Schlitterbahn and free admission if you knew somebody who worked there too.Ragoo said:
Back to new braunfels but the population is easily 3x OPs range.
murphyag said:
This thread is of interest as I'm already starting to research areas of Texas for retirement. The size town OP asks about is the type of town I'm looking at for retirement living.
What do you guys think of the Palestine area? Or Abilene area and surrounding smaller towns? Or Sherman/Denison (near Lake Texoma)?
I'm leaning toward somewhere in or near BCS or Tyler. What are your thoughts on Tyler and surrounding smaller towns?
Looking for decent shopping, easy access to hospitals for old folk issues that arise, college or university nearby for continuing ed classes, sporting events, etc.
Ragoo said:
Look at wimberly
3rd Platoon said:
Kerrville
Burdizzo said:Ragoo said:
Look at wimberly
I grew up with kids from Wimberley in the 1980s. Most of them hate what Wimberley has become.
Irony is that most of those families moved there from Houston in the 1970s. Before that it was just a village of cedar choppers.