ESTP

"Sexually, ESTPs have no real reservations. It's fun, it's physically enjoyable, new ideas are always welcome, and ESTP personalities' strong perception keeps them well-tuned to their partners' needs."

ENTJ-A - Commander - Analyst and People Mastery

DrHeadShrink said:

---

https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test

I'm INTJ or INTP - it flips frequently

---

ESFJ or P. Mine flips as well.

Mr.NiceGuy said:

---

ESTP

"Sexually, ESTPs have no real reservations. It's fun, it's physically enjoyable, new ideas are always welcome, and ESTP personalities' strong perception keeps them well-tuned to their partners' needs."

---

Open to butt stuff. Spreadsheet updated.

HBCanine08 said:

---

Mr.NiceGuy said:

---

ESTP

"Sexually, ESTPs have no real reservations. It's fun, it's physically enjoyable, new ideas are always welcome, and ESTP personalities' strong perception keeps them well-tuned to their partners' needs."

---

Open to butt stuff. Spreadsheet updated.

---

Excited that a man is open to butt stuff.

Spreadsheet updated.

Virtuoso (ISTP-T)

I always get I and T on these things, and usually S, but the J/P dimension varies.

INFP-T

commando2004 said:

---

Virtuoso (ISTP-T)

I always get I and T on these things, and usually S, but the J/P dimension varies.

---

Interesting. You're the third so far to have the J and P swap back and forth. Wonder why that is.....

MBTI is to 5 Factor Model as Newtonian Mechanics is to Relativity, at best.

Enjoy your horoscopes.

Some people are just not strongly indicated on that metric and have aspects of both. I am a fairly moderate P, but it isn't quite near 50/50 P to J like some.

INTP

Not sure when this thread was last posted but I got ESTJ-A again.

americathegreat1492 said:

---

MBTI is to 5 Factor Model as Newtonian Mechanics is to Relativity, at best.

Enjoy your horoscopes.

---

Yeah yeah yeah "look at me, I know smart stuff"

ENFP-A

ESFJ - T - I usually stick way out from the group when I've done these in the past and they would show us the results on a chart where everyone in the group would fall. There would be the large clumps of people all together and off by itself would be lonely old me.

Sweet Clementine said:

---

ESFJ-T. Not sure I've ever actually taken the test before, but seems pretty accurate.

---

Hello fellow outlier. I bet you have nice knockers.

Ignatius_of_Silesia said:

---

ESFJ - T - I usually stick way out from the group when I've done these in the past and they would show us the results on a chart where everyone in the group would fall. There would be the large clumps of people all together and off by itself would be lonely old me.

---

I have the same sort of experience. The only E in a group of I's.

MooreTrucker said:

---

americathegreat1492 said:

---

MBTI is to 5 Factor Model as Newtonian Mechanics is to Relativity, at best.

Enjoy your horoscopes.

---

Yeah yeah yeah "look at me, I know smart stuff"

---

I'm an INTJ.

Doink the Clown said:

---

I'm still INFJ...just like I have been every other time this thread comes up

---

MBTI twinsies *high five*

Flips between ISTJ and INTJ

AggieDarlin said:

---

Doink the Clown said:

---

I'm still INFJ...just like I have been every other time this thread comes up

---

MBTI twinsies *high five*

---

Nice! Knew I liked you for a reason.

ENTP-A

Myers Briggs has really poor reliability (ie, your type changes) and is not considered a personality measure with high validity

UMichAg said:

---

Myers Briggs has really poor reliability (ie, your type changes) and is not considered a personality measure with high validity

---

we've used the Birkman Assesment at work. I need to dig that out and refresh actually.

I'm BMF according to my wallet.

ENTJ same every time done this test.

SanAntoneAg said:

---

I'm BMF according to my wallet.

---

Stricker and Ross (1963)

"However, in terms of continuous scores, the Indicator seems to have about the same reliability as better known personality inventories, such as the California Psychological Inventory (Gough, 1957), the Guilford-Zimrnerman Temperament Survey (Guilford & Zirnrner- man, 1949), the 16 P. F. Test (Cattell, Saunders, & Stice, 1957), and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Hathaway & McKinley, 1951), many of which employ longer scales."

Studies a meta-analytic reliability generalization study

Robert M Capraro, Mary Margaret Capraro
Educational and Psychological Measurement 62 (4), 590-602, 2002
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was submitted to a descriptive reliability generalization (RG) analysis to characterize the variability of measurement error in MBTI scores across administrations. In general, the MBTI and its scales yielded scores with strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability estimates, although variation was observed.

Look at opinion pieces from Psychology Today for pseudo-intellectual articles by someone who doesn't understand assessments. LMAO

BurnetAggie99 said:

---

ENTJ same every time done this test.

---

That's what research shows. Look above - 4 "flips" but all were only one factor which is to be expected-remember the scales are QUANTIFIED and so my J score is low and my P score is low, that's why I flip from J to P to J.
Nobody went from INTJ to ESFP. My I and N is huge quantitatively so I'd never EXPECT a flip. My T is very high, but with a low P and low J, of course the "category" flips during retest from P to J. That's logic not proof of a weak test-retest correlation or not being meaningful.
Finally, the USE and INTERPRETATION of the results are critical and that's where most of the problems come into play.

PIIHB