quote:
It is very clear that most people that have posted 1)have never shopped for an engagement ring or have any idea how much they cost 2)don't make very much money 3)would, for some reason, rather spend the money on something that will immediately lose it's value (cars, seadoos, etc.)
1) I've bought two. The first time I was still in school, and we bought a cheap one. Unfortunately, the marriage didn't last.
On my SECOND opportunity, I bought one the smart way. A diamond's value is dependent on its 4 C's, not the store you buy it at.
I went to
http://www.pricescope.com/and found a diamond that met my criteria. 1 Carat, Color H or better, Clarity SI1 or better, and an EXCELLENT Cut (the most important C). [EXCELLENT means HCA of 2 or lower, or an AGS rating of 0 or 1.]
I wound up buying my diamond at White Flash for somewhere a little over $4000. They have a simliar one right now going for $6298, including pricescope discount (prices have gone up significantly since I bought).
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-608073.htmWe went to one of the nicer (non-mall) jewelry stores here in San Antonio and picked out a platinum setting and matching wedding band with baguette and round side accent diamonds for somewhere around $1000.
She gets compliments all the time, often from strangers. All for less than $6000. 1 Carat is PLENTY big for her hand (she's 5'5" and 110#).
2) The "two months salary" rule is just stupid. It was created by the diamond marketers, and repeated as often as possible, to create an expectation on the part of the woman, and a feeling of obligation on the part of the man.
3) I have friends who have had engagements broken, and they've taken 30% or bigger hits on the resale of the ring. Especially if they bought retail.
I'd GUESS the idiot's girlfriend is either a high maintenance biotch or a weak-minded and vain "me too" girl. But that's just a guess.
I was happy to buy my wife's ring... ESPECIALLY after she told me "I don't need a diamond ring". Look for that kind of woman, guys!
[This message has been edited by TX AG 88 (edited 1/31/2008 3:35p).]