Forward
5′7″
Spring, TX
Klein Oak
Junior
11/15/2023
Aggie soccer prepares for 'huge challenge' vs. No. 1 overall seed Florida State
11/10/2023
Stayin' Alive! A&M advances as Pante's miraculous goal stuns Colorado
9/20/2023
Guerrieri previews upcoming meetings with Bulldogs, No. 11 Razorbacks
8/30/2023
Guerrieri & Co. cap off four-match homestand with Tulsa on Thursday
8/10/2023
Striker Maile Hayes says a tough summer has A&M prepared to succeed
8/7/2023
Around Aggieland (8/7)
3/24/2023
Maile Hayes & Aggie soccer using spring slate to build for 2023 season
10/18/2022
Guerrieri & Aggie soccer hit the road to face No. 24 South Carolina
11/1/2021
Around Aggieland (11/1)
10/25/2021
Around Aggieland (10/25)
10/22/2021
Around Aggieland (10/22)
10/18/2021
Around Aggieland (10/18)
10/8/2021
Around Aggieland (10/8)
10/4/2021
Around Aggieland (10/4)
9/24/2021
Around Aggieland (9/24)
9/13/2021
Around Aggieland (9/13)
9/10/2021
Around Aggieland (9/10)
9/6/2021
Around Aggieland (9/6)
8/23/2021
Around Aggieland (8/23)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.