Defensive Lineman
6′4″
/
300 lbs
Virginia Beach, VA
Bishop Sullivan
Junior (RS)
Learned, Loved, Loathed: Texas A&M 52, Prairie View A&M 3
Texas A&M football wrapped up its home slate on Saturday afternoon with a 52-3 drubbing of Prairie View A&M at Kyle Field. Following the big win on Senior Day, Olin Buchanan shares what he learned, loved and loathed about the Aggies' performance.
25:58
No. 16 Aggies showcase youth in efficiently dominant win over PVAMU, 52-3
No. 16 Texas A&M cruised to a 52-3 win over Prairie View A&M on Senior Day at Kyle Field. While the veterans were honored before the game, the Aggies played a number of youngsters throughout as the kids offered a glimpse of what's to come in the future.
Post Game Review: No. 16 Texas A&M 52, Prairie View A&M 3
The Aggies delivered on all fronts on Saturday, thoroughly dominating the visiting Panthers from Prairie View. Six different Texas A&M players had a hand in a touchdown in the final 2021 contest at Kyle Field.
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 44, South Carolina 14
The Texas A&M defense was stout against the Gamecocks, giving up just 185 total yards while also forcing three turnovers. Billy Liucci details the unit's strong performance as they head into the bye week.
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 35, Missouri 14
The Aggie defense started the game in Columbia with a turnover and kept up the pace and pressure all afternoon, controlling an offense that averaged 37 points a game. Billy Liucci details an effort that suggests A&M is continuing to get closer to playing its best football.
All Updates
6/10/2020
Aggie Football 1-99: Breaking down jerseys numbers 51-70
5/5/2020
Commit Breakdown: Liucci goes in-depth on new commit Victory Vaka
4/30/2020
Liucci: Aggies continue to stack talent on defensive side of the ball
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.