Guard
6′0″
/
175 lbs
Houston, TX
Senior
39:30
Kyle Dobbins reflects on his time at A&M, 2016 run, role of crowd favorite
During Tuesday's edition of TexAgs Radio, now former A&M basketball player Kyle Dobbins joined to discuss his time at Texas A&M, his role of crowd favorite, the Aggies' 2016 NCAA Tournament run and much, much more. Additionally, Dobbins answered various questions from TexAgs users and the show's text inbox.
8:21
Kyle Dobbins gives his account of his NCAA Tournament appearance
In Texas A&M's first NCAA Tournament win since 2010, perhaps the greatest moment came long after the Aggies had gone up by more than 20 in garbage time. After a memorable bucket in the waning moments of the Green Bay win, senior guard Kyle Dobbins broke down the moment and the program's run.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 92, Green Bay 65 (NCAA 1st Round)
Survive and advance is the mantra, but on Friday Texas A&M did much more than that. Swimming in a sea of upsets, the Aggies shook off a slow start and pasted Green Bay to move on to the second round. In the process, they learned something else about themselves.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 84, Texas 73
In their first game as a top-25 ranked team, the Aggies came away with a big first-round win over the Texas Longhorns at the Battle 4 Atlantis in the Bahamas — led by senior Danuel House and anchored by true freshman Tyler Davis.
Five Thoughts: Texas A&M 104, South Carolina Upstate 64
A fast pace, instant-impact freshmen, a new dimension at the point, team defense ... the list of eye-catching positives from Texas A&M's season-opening win goes on. After one game there are improvements to be made, but the Aggies' potential appears to be high.
All Updates
4/26/2016
Kyle Dobbins reflects on his time at A&M, 2016 run, role of crowd favorite
3/19/2016
Kyle Dobbins gives his account of his NCAA Tournament appearance
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.