Forward
6′7″
/
208 lbs
Ontario, Canada
Sophomore
4/20/2021
Logan Lee analyzes the current status of Texas A&M's basketball roster
3/12/2021
Around Aggieland (3/12)
3/11/2021
Lee & French share their thoughts on A&M's season-ending loss
3/5/2021
Around Aggieland (3/5)
3/4/2021
Lee & French react to Texas A&M's better-than-expected return
2/1/2021
Around Aggieland (2/1)
1/20/2021
John Thornton: Emanuel Miller still adjusting to being top of scouting report
12/14/2020
Around Aggieland (12/14)
12/4/2020
Around Aggieland (12/4)
2/18/2020
Aggie Hotlist: The week's best athletic performers on campus
2/3/2020
Buzz Williams analyzes 1-1 road swing, emergence of Jonathan Aku
1/28/2020
Aggie Hotlist: The week's best athletic performers on campus
1/22/2020
Thornton: Aggies' focus, attention to detail key toward building culture
1/21/2020
Texas A&M fends off a late Missouri surge to survive a road scare, 66-64
11/5/2019
John Pugliese outlines what to expect from Buzz's first A&M team
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.