Infielder
6′0″
/
165 lbs
New Braunfels, TX
Canyon
Freshman
By the Numbers: Consistent offense lifts A&M to 3-1 outing in week eight
Jim Schlossnagle and the Aggies put together one of their most consistent weeks yet with an upset over No. 10 Texas State and a critical series win over Kentucky. With week eight now in the rearview, Gabe Bock deep-dives the statistics following another four-game slate.
'Round the Horn: Baseball bunch answers 10 questions as SEC play looms
Texas A&M continues to play inconsistent baseball as a road trip to Baton Rouge for a three-game set with LSU is now staring down Jim Schlosnagle & Co. Ahead of this weekend's series with LSU, the TexAgs baseball coverage team answers questions during the Maroon & White.
5:20
Bullpen struggles, limited offense strike again as A&M falls to Houston, 8-2
Despite a brilliant start by Khristian Curtis, Texas A&M's relievers fell flat in an 8-2 loss to Houston on Tuesday night. Outhit by the Cougars, A&M failed to take full advantage of runners in scoring position as 11 Aggies in total were left stranded.
By The Numbers: Texas A&M claims series victory over Santa Clara
With SEC play looming large, Texas A&M posted a 3-1 week against Tarleton and Santa Clara to get back on track before this weekend's trip to Baton Rouge. Gabe Bock deep dives the statistics following a nice fourth week of the season for the Maroon & White.
Baseball Thoughts: The good, bad and ugly from the Santa Clara series
Texas A&M claimed a much-needed series win over Santa Clara this past weekend, taking two of three games from the Broncos at Olsen Field at Blue Bell Park. Ryan Brauninger takes a look at the good, bad and ugly that came from the weekend set.
All Updates
2/13/2022
5 Days 'til Aggie Baseball: One-on-One with hitting coach Michael Earley
2/12/2022
6 Days 'til Aggie Baseball: One-on-One with assistant coach Nolan Cain
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.