*** Game Thread: #8 Texas A&M vs Cal Poly - Texas A&M Invitational ***

6,331 Views | 102 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by foulbeast
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cal Poly's block coming out strong in this set
fitzwatema
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A little sloppy here in this set.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12-11 Ags

Nice play out of our timeout
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But they're clawing their way back
Dr. Horrible
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sleuthofbears said:

Unless I'm missing something, that was maybe the worst call I've ever seen in sports
Was this the double touches? I was trying to figure out what was going on there.
sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah where they called Ring for a double touch when she hit the ball with one hand
KLB93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think there were three double touches called yesterday, just trying to free ball back to other side.
sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has Cal Poly tried simply not touching the net?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ags getting sloppy

17-20
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
21-21

Timeout Poly
sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kirra Musgrove my goat
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
24-22
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a sweep and what a win for the Aggies. They just beat an experienced team who made the sweet sixteen last season. We handled their explosive hitters and explosive serves. This Aggie team is maturing, growing, and improving! What a weekend!
Vade281
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Way to close it out!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's a reason that banner is hanging up there! There is a standard for this Texas A&M Volleyball Program, a championship standard!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ags got two ranked opponents coming early this upcoming week in the Big 10 - SEC Challenge

Purdue on Tuesday
Indiana on Wednesday
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

taylorswift13_ said:

Kirra Musgrove coming out party


Nice set for Musgrove.

Nicholson did not play in the 2nd set for those not watching live.

Any indication why?
fitzwatema
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flintdragon said:

Gap said:

taylorswift13_ said:

Kirra Musgrove coming out party


Nice set for Musgrove.

Nicholson did not play in the 2nd set for those not watching live.

Any indication why?


Musgrove was serving well along with being more consistent setting, would be my guess.
Rambotx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Aggie's hard practice in preparation and timely game management/coaching helps them to win the close sets.
Wicked Good Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dr. Horrible said:

sleuthofbears said:

Unless I'm missing something, that was maybe the worst call I've ever seen in sports
Was this the double touches? I was trying to figure out what was going on there.


If you are talking about the call on the double to the outside hitter. R1 determined the block touch it before the outside hitter and since it was a double on the actual set then it is a double. The question was really if our outside touched it before the block and I think that was what Jamie is saying. If so that is not reviewable call.
KLB93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big steps forward tonight for three of our younger players - Kaia, Kirra and Taryn. If we keep spreading the attacks around this team is going to be a nightmare to face late in the year.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also props to Ava Underwood on the call, she was great! Although biased cause she kept referring to one team as "WE"
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flintdragon said:

Gap said:

taylorswift13_ said:

Kirra Musgrove coming out party


Nice set for Musgrove.

Nicholson did not play in the 2nd set for those not watching live.

Any indication why?

Musgrove played the entire 2nd and 3rd set. Nicholson did not play in either. I don't believe there was an injury or anything. I think it was "performance" based (but that is just my assumption).

I didn't think either setter had a particularly good 1st set, but Musgrove really upped her game in the 2nd and 3rd set tonight doing a really nice job!
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ring additionally had a great night.

I'd additionally like to mention Taryn Morris who I thought was really solid tonight.
TulaneAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I watched Friday and Saturday evening matches in person and we're gonna need Musgrove and her outside hitters to get much better and more in sync quick as we step up in competition these next 2 weeks. I think we all see her potential and the high ceiling. And it appears she's gonna get as many reps as she needs to work it out, but it's rougher than I'd like to see heading into this Big 10/SEC challenge, Stanford, and Wisconsin stretch.

Her and Taryn are in sync on the back set and the slide sets with Castle and Sharp are consistent as well. But her and Ring & Fitch are still way off. I'm not sure if she just doesn't put enough air under the ball for them OR if they are strategically trying to lower/quicken that set, but they are way outta sync on that left side. Her middle set got better later in each match, but it still needs to be more consistent.

sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it was performance, kind of odd that we'd switch to Musgrove full time in the middle of a match. You'd think we would have either started in a 5-1 or played out Cal Poly in the 5-2 and switched to the 5-1 before Purdue.
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't see anything from Nicholson that would have prompted the change. It wasn't even halfway through the 1st set. I think she only had one rotation through the back row at that point. Maybe coach saw something from Musgrove that he went with it.
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Musgrove's height brings several things to the table that Nicholson does not have. Musgrove has been here two years and recruited by this staff. Has three more to play if she likes. These are just off the top of my head why Jaime wants to give her more time. You do trust this coaching staff I would hope.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was just stating my observations from the game. Obviously Morrison saw something that flipped the switch.

This staff is the best in the country no doubt!
FluAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flintdragon said:

I didn't see anything from Nicholson that would have prompted the change. It wasn't even halfway through the 1st set. I think she only had one rotation through the back row at that point. Maybe coach saw something from Musgrove that he went with it.


I really just don't think in an ideal world they want to play this 5-2. I think there are a lot of benefits to playing a 5-1 and Musgrove has a massive advantage because of her length and offensive ability, assuming she can set as well as Lily. I think the hitters also benefit from the consistency of having one setter in there IMO.

We will see if they keep rolling with it or if it was just something that Morrison saw in that specific matchup that he liked.
foulbeast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FluAggie said:

flintdragon said:

I didn't see anything from Nicholson that would have prompted the change. It wasn't even halfway through the 1st set. I think she only had one rotation through the back row at that point. Maybe coach saw something from Musgrove that he went with it.


I really just don't think in an ideal world they want to play this 5-2. I think there are a lot of benefits to playing a 5-1 and Musgrove has a massive advantage because of her length and offensive ability, assuming she can set as well as Lily. I think the hitters also benefit from the consistency of having one setter in there IMO.

We will see if they keep rolling with it or if it was just something that Morrison saw in that specific matchup that he liked.

Don't forget the defensive aspect. We have a limited sample with Kirra playing back row, but I'll be watching to see if opposing offenses hit at her when she is in the back row. Her height works against her there...
FluAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
foulbeast said:

FluAggie said:

flintdragon said:

I didn't see anything from Nicholson that would have prompted the change. It wasn't even halfway through the 1st set. I think she only had one rotation through the back row at that point. Maybe coach saw something from Musgrove that he went with it.


I really just don't think in an ideal world they want to play this 5-2. I think there are a lot of benefits to playing a 5-1 and Musgrove has a massive advantage because of her length and offensive ability, assuming she can set as well as Lily. I think the hitters also benefit from the consistency of having one setter in there IMO.

We will see if they keep rolling with it or if it was just something that Morrison saw in that specific matchup that he liked.

Don't forget the defensive aspect. We have a limited sample with Kirra playing back row, but I'll be watching to see if opposing offenses hit at her when she is in the back row. Her height works against her there...


Well the college trend is taller liberos so they can cover more ground so it's not necessarily something that works against her.
foulbeast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't see many liberos at 6'2".
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.