Weekend in review

2,008 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 28 days ago by flintdragon
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First weekend done. Two very tough teams to start off with and was just too tall an ask for this young team. Louisville is such a stable team with very few weaknesses and SMU is a team that seem to play with a lot of intensity. I wasn't sure what thought I wanted to end the weekend with. I think I will go with on-court leadership.

Missing Stowers was huge not only in points and defensive production, but also in leadership as the only returning starter. Her absence on the court cannot be emphasized enough. We have good transfers but they can't really lead with so few games played as a group. Ring could provide some leadership but it seemed like she might have been carrying too much on her shoulders with the sudden injury to Stowers. She showed us her capabilities that gave her her All American status but she had to worry about carrying the points load more than anything else.

We need to run a 5-1. The setter is a leadership position at the very least calling the plays. The setting needs to be as consistent as possible for hitters to feel comfortable. If Musgrove is a much better blocker, she should start unless Nicholson has shown she is a much better setter. We need all the blocking help we can muster right now.

The returners who saw some court time last year don't seem to be of the leadership type. Fitch and Morris played better than I expected given they were limited last year. Applegate did Applegate things in the back. But none of them are leaders as far as I can tell during interviews and videos.

Gabi lead more by example but I couldn't tell if vocally she was involved from what TV was showing us. She is so new but I expect her to assume her regular backcourt personality that I've seen from her.

A team needs an identity and not just a collection of good players. Stowers was a key and her absence affected the team more than we probably realize.

I mentioned in an earlier thread, practice this week should just be blocking, blocking and more blocking. I'm not worried about service errors. Not too worried about getting blocked at this point (that happened at times last year too).

This season will be super interesting to see the growth of each player in the Morrison training system. Looking forward to it!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well well said! I wished we had shown more intensity throughout. I think the concept of not having Kyndal out there puzzled everyone and they all weren't sure who should step up and be that vocal leader. It was obvious when we gave up runs, we were looking around at each other with a puzzled look. I think Gabi has the voice to lead! In an interview, Ring mentioned how vocal Gabi is, so maybe we see more as the season goes on.

As the season progresses and we go through some highs and lows, they'll get more comfortable with one another and the leaders will step up. I really think we need a 5-1 also, whomever it may be. I'd hope if we go with Musgrove she's able to pass out of the back row.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Morrison and his staff have a proven track record of in season improvement and development! That's where my faith is right now! Blocking and serving will improve as they have each year under Morrison through the season! We just need to fix up our timing and setting and hopefully with more game reps that will happen!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I want 3 sweeps this weekend
dcg4403
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not trying to be a negative nancy but I would not expect much this season. Simply don't think the talent is there to compete at the highest levels this season.

Program just isn't quite there. Hoping Jamie can keep making improvements and bring more depth and talent to make a run within the SEC next year.

Baby steps this year.
Wicked Good Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have some work to do but without Stowers anchoring the pin I will reserve judgment for a bit longer. We had some blocks as well and some good runs.

Issue was we gave up to many runs of points against arguably two top ten teams without our NCAA MVP from last year able to play who also anchors the passing game. We will be much better in that regard compared to last season and we will see that as the season progresses.
Ring showed a lot of fight and competitiveness but will have to limit errors in future. Have to be able to score points against teams with a block like SMU just like teams had to find ways to score against us last year and in the end couldn't.

As for setting I am Ok continuing the system used for this coming weekend if Stowers is limited or out. If she is a go maybe see how Fitch does on RS in a 6-2 system a bit. F we run a 5-1 after this weekend I would love to see Stowers when healthy hit from RB on the D set and let Applegate play middle back position as a sub for whoever is RS currently Morris.

I saw a lot of positives honestly from a team that replaced every single player on the court last year sans Addi as a DS
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I expect a lot, a top 3/4 finish in the sec, hosting, and a sweet sixteen trip at a minimum! We can't judge our entire season's outlook after matches against two top teams in August when we weren't at full strength with how inexperienced our lineup was. It's August and we still have 3 matches in August and lots more volleyball to play. I wouldn't doubt this staff.
Bowhunter08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These losses may be a blessing. If we (fans) are agonizing over the losses and searching for answers, then the coaches and team are doing it too times a 1,000. Mentally they will be locked in more so than if they won a game this weekend.

With 3 cup cake games ahead, I believe we will see a much better team than what we saw in MKE.

Go Lady Ags!!!

taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Cal Poly is a really good team, they should be ranked soon and will definitely be scaring a team in round 2! But we should still handle them easily!

But you are right, if we felt bad, the look on Jamie's face told me everything towards the end of that match. He was trying to stay strong and calm, but if you read his eyes, that second loss hurt. He takes losing personally, more than any coach I've seen on this campus, I have no doubt they'll bounce back
Wicked Good Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bowhunter08 said:

These losses may be a blessing. If we (fans) are agonizing over the losses and searching for answers, then the coaches and team are doing it too times a 1,000. Mentally they will be locked in more so than if they won a game this weekend.

With 3 cup cake games ahead, I believe we will see a much better team than what we saw in MKE.

Go Lady Ags!!!




Cal Poly went to Sweet 16 last year
Edit for Cal Poly instead of Cal Poky
sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How are we feeling about Fitch vs Morris at opposite once Stowers is back? I think I prefer Fitch, I feel like she was hitting pretty well in the second game and Morris seems like a liability at the service line.
Ag4eva95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do you mean the program isn't there? We just won a natty. You don't just lose 9 seniors and an injury to your only returning all American and leader and expect to be a top 10 team. With Stowers. We would have beat Louisville and take a set or two off SMU. We have 2 soph transfer middles. A soph OH and Opp. A senior transfer OH(although very good, it takes time to find your role). A senior transfer setter and a soph setter. The talent is there. Easily. The program is there. Easily. Everyone is in a new spotlight and the expectations have been raised.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This one's tricky, I like Morris' size and block! Think we hardly set her enough against SMU, she's a lot more efficient and terminal than Fitch. We went on two 4-0 runs with Morris serving although her serve doesn't seem to do much. Unless we can set Fitch out of the back row, then it's a whole different story
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the team wasn't as good to start as we were hoping but they definitely are not as bad as we are feeling now.

Just too many pieces to work on. SMU plays a lot of new faces as well but their recruiting strategy seems to be pick up players that they can win with now versus development. I like Jamie's approach better. SMU seems to hit a ceiling in the tournament each year even though they make a splash in the regular season.

Expectations this year for me is Sweet 16 still. Nothing currently is hinting otherwise.
Drundel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Casual fan here with no knowledge of what 5-2, 6-2, etc, means so here's my take from watching both matches.

Match 1 vs Louisville

  • I felt we were undersized/not athletic enough at the net. I don't know if its considered bad form, but they were tricky in some of the shots and would fake a set and instead just dump it over and catch us off guard and get an easy point... they did this a lot.
  • Seemed like we were disorganized and no leader on the court, I get Stowers was supposed to be our leader, but no-one stepped up.
  • Too many serving errors
  • Ring was full power and go bigger was her solution, she sailed too many
  • Gabi was awesome. I hope she continues to improve.
  • Chloe Chicoine was a beast, would have been awesome to have her the past three years
Match 2 vs SMU

  • No energy, after the first set it seemed like we were already defeated.
  • Too predicable. Seemed like the only plan was to set it up for Ring and SMU keyed off that. I think at one time Ring had 9 kills and the rest of the team had 2. Ouch
  • Castle played well and I wished she had more PT and stepped up more
  • I thought Morris played well at the net, a few severing errors
I don't want to hear any excuses from Morrison. He knew he was losing nine starters and you had all offseason to get the team to gel, it hasn't happened yet.

I hope we can figure it out quickly.
Look Out Below
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was actually encouraged by the first match. Louisville had every reason in the world to want our scalp and we went toe-to-toe with them in every set. Every set in that match could have gone either way. To lose five starters then your one returning starter minutes before the match and still be that composed and up to the task was something the team and staff should be proud of. Nothing to hang their heads about at all. We just needed a little more seasoning.

Now, the SMU match bothered me a little more. We were getting a significant amount of early points from SMU errors and not our own play. I feel like SMU made way more errors than Louisville did. Later in the match it was troubling how quickly SMU was putting away balls meanwhile we were getting a lot of attacks blocked. SMU won almost every long rally. We've got to find a way around a good blocking team like SMU was.

Individually, I thought Gabi was unbelievable considering that was her first college gameplay. I think she might have been our best player this weekend. I ****ing love Ring's swing. She has an absolute cannon. She just needs to watch some of those balls going long from time-to-time. I thought Fitch was little rough Friday (understandable with the Stowers situation) but probably improved the most of any player from Friday to Sunday. I thought Morris generally played well when she was given opportunities to swing.

Our blocking as a unit has got to improve. We have the size; we've just got get to the spots. I did like seeing Musgrove getting in there blocking a few balls. I'd also like to see the middles put down more balls. Castle and Sharp are too good and too tall to be getting single blocked. Both girls, especially Sharp, put down some nice balls this weekend; we just need way more of it. Non-Gabi passing has got to improve which I think will improve the setting issues we had.

It didn't beat us by any means but I HATE service errors. I just absolutely LOATHE giving points away. IMO if you don't have the kind of serve that can REALLY put pressure on the other team that makes it worth the risk, just serve a decent ball and execute your defense. If you cut those out, those errors are the difference between winning and losing multiple sets in matches like last weekend.
sleuthofbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know Morris had a better hitting percentage but I feel like Fitch was generally getting harder sets (I have not rewatched the match so I might just be misremembering). She also had that pretty impressive run in (iirc) the second set where she got like 3 kills in quick succession tooling the block, which was really nice to see.
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sleuthofbears said:

I know Morris had a better hitting percentage but I feel like Fitch was generally getting harder sets (I have not rewatched the match so I might just be misremembering). She also had that pretty impressive run in (iirc) the second set where she got like 3 kills in quick succession tooling the block, which was really nice to see.

Fitch was playing OH so out of system sets tend to go to OH. Unless you have a beast like Lednicky on the OPP, OOS sets go to the outside hitter.

And even then, that's a hard swing and not every hitter can connect with it with enough power to win the point.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Setting makes a difference, but it seems Natalie Ring was trying so hard multiple times to roll the block or hit off hands! With that heavy of an arm, rip it down! When we set her straight she can annihilate a ball!

If Kyndal's out this weekend we need a more efficient Natalie
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also so many Ags talking about volleyball makes us happy! This community is growing! Hope this weekend has a good turnout
Look Out Below
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I bought season tickets this year and plan on going to all three matches this weekend. I hope we really take it out on these poor teams coming in here.
Swollen Thumb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taylorswift13_ said:

Setting makes a difference, but it seems Natalie Ring was trying so hard multiple times to roll the block or hit off hands! With that heavy of an arm, rip it down! When we set her straight she can annihilate a ball!

If Kyndal's out this weekend we need a more efficient Natalie


We are WAY too slow and predictable on offense which makes it very difficult for OH. Waak set a much faster ball last year leading to more one-on-ones and split blocks for our pins. SMUs block was waiting on us all night. It wasn't Ring's fault. She was doing everything she could trying to over power the block all night. Our distribution has to get better. Our offense has to get faster and our new middles have to produce. Their hitting % for middles is atrocious so far. They aren't in the same league as Cos and Perkins. In fairness, not many are. RS is a huge drop off also (understandably). Basically defenses aren't respecting anyone but OH and cheating the block that way. Have to get more creative and quick which Jaimie is big on, so I expect a lot of improvement in that areas moving forward.

And we really need Stowers. She's the straw that stirs the drink.
Wicked Good Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We averaged 7 hitting errors per sets in the six sets we lost. We averaged five digs less than our opponents for the trip.
Sharp looked good on the slide in the play I saw. Morris had a great stat line hitting wise. A few serving errors. Do we send her an OOS ball occasionally? Not sure if that is an option right now. We had that option for three years with Underwood and Lednicky at least enough to hold a block. When you run a 5-1 modified like we are if the pass is off and setter is front row we have no option other than OH. Stowers and Lednicky could hit the D ball as an option. Ring and Stowers can hit a BIC or something like that as an option as well later in season.

I hope people realize that even with Stowers these were going to be tough matches and we have a completely different team out on the court that hasn't had time to gel. Morrison and his staff have gotten us better over the course of the season better than most programs in terms of seasonal development.

This was going to be different than last year. More middles off of one foot. More back row attack options. We saw the slides in the first match for sure. We didn't see the back row as much because Stowers wasn't on the court.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Look Out Below said:

I bought season tickets this year and plan on going to all three matches this weekend. I hope we really take it out on these poor teams coming in here.
enjoy! Should be a fun weekend, maybe even a tear will shed as the banner drops Friday night!
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't decide if I should go for the banner drop (Friday) or the more competitive game (Saturday)! Can only make one unfortunately.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know you personally, but I know how much you watched this team last season and how much you care and support Aggie Volleyball! You were here for it all and you deserve to be there when that banner drops! Same for a lot of posters on this thread! Go celebrate it and take it all in, watch a fun match and go get a good dinner!
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish I could be there for that banner drop, I'd be tearing up like a baby! I haven't been to a single match of the Morrison Era, hard to get out to Aggieland, but if all goes well, I should be there if we're hosting in December (God willing we host and I can make it out there)
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taylorswift13_ said:

I wish I could be there for that banner drop, I'd be tearing up like a baby! I haven't been to a single match of the Morrison Era, hard to get out to Aggieland, but if all goes well, I should be there if we're hosting in December (God willing we host and I can make it out there)

Dang ts13! I knew you weren't able to make a lot of this stuff but didn't know this! If we host, you can sit next to me!
TheOne1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The most annoying thing was the amount of touches we would get at the net, and then not be able to get under the ball before it fell at our blockers feet. I took it for granted that we were sending those back over after the consistency of last year.
______________
Class of 2007 | 2nd generation Aggie | Hullabaloo band founding member | A&M Vball & Bball ball boy 94-95

taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deal
haydayenthusiast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Per sam erger's diet coke on VolleyTalk, here were the passing stats for the SMU-TAMU match:

"SMU-A&M

SMU 2.01
Suli 1.97 (18) (VM has her in as Tonga-Davis... did she change that?)
Harris 2.47 (17)
Frazee 1.50 (10)
Wilburn 1.67 (9)

A&M 2.19
Fitch 1.90 (31)
Rodriguez 2.73 (15)
Ring 1.96 (13)
Applegate 3.00 (4)"
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gabi/Addi near perfect.
flintdragon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taylorswift13_ said:

I don't know you personally, but I know how much you watched this team last season and how much you care and support Aggie Volleyball! You were here for it all and you deserve to be there when that banner drops! Same for a lot of posters on this thread! Go celebrate it and take it all in, watch a fun match and go get a good dinner!

Man, thank you for this! For sure contributed to me deciding which game to attend this weekend. The banner drop wasn't long, but it was fitting and very emotional. Great final closure for us fans who watched that team grind over 3 years on this court.

Sure, they will celebrate a couple more times like on Kyle Field, but this is their home in front of these fans.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.